Which do you think is higher in China, scientist or celebrity?

Updated on science 2024-06-19
25 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    In China, the status of scientists and stars is different, in the eyes of all Chinese, scientists are our heroes, and scientists have a higher status than stars. Scientists are the pride of our nation, the pride of our country, the status of stars is incomparable with them, let us pay tribute to those who contribute to the construction of our countryScientistsSalute.

    1. Salute our Chinese scientists, thank them for their advice on the construction of our countryScientists and stars cannot be compared together, some people like to chase stars, that is just part of the niche psychology, and in our China, scientists are stars that every one of us should chase. We can also see that there are some celebrity idols that people like to pursue, and they are also standing together with those big scientists to take photos, they are fans of those big scientists, and they are with Yuan Longping.

    Academicians together, they and Zhong Nanshan.

    Academicians stand together, they show special admiration, scientists are our Chinese nation.

    The pride of China is the pride of our country.

    2. Scientists are people who have contributed to our motherland, without the existence of scientists, there would be no our motherland Today, all of us should care about scientists, our country has given these scientists who have contributed to the great treatment, and the construction of China is inseparable from the contributions made by these scientists to our motherland. Including the emergence of this epidemic, we all remember a person's name Zhong Nanshan, if there is no Academician Zhong Nanshan, we may become panicked, Academician Zhong Nanshan is one of our banners, we are proud of this eighty-year-old man. When the country was in trouble, he rushed to the forefront, he went deep into the epidemic area, gave guidance, and popularized science to the public, and his voice was the most authoritative.

    All Chinese love, he is the star we want to chase, our country respects scientists, the status of scientists is noble, stars are not comparable.

    Our country attaches great importance to scientists, the people love scientists, and the status of scientists is always higher than that of stars. Celebrities should learn from scientists, correct their attitude towards life, and do more things that are meaningful to the country and the people.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I think that in China, the status of celebrities is higher than that of scientists. Because everyone knows about celebrities, but scientists are almost impossible to know, so we should learn more about these scientists than about celebrities.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    I think in the eyes of most people, the status of celebrities is higher, but in their hearts, the status of scientists is higher, because we respect and love these scientists from the bottom of our hearts.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The status of scientists is higher, and celebrities are only well-known among the public, just a kind of consumption and entertainment, but the status is not as high as that of scientists in the country.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    <> it is safe to say that it is true, Chinese scientists, in terms of public influence, income, popularity, status and other aspects, are far inferior to entertainment stars. The reason is not that scientists' achievements are not as good as entertainment stars, the core reason is that news is report-oriented, reporters often chase celebrity gossip, and newspapers and periodicals are about to become entertainment media. Scientists and scientific achievements, but rarely reported.

    In this way, only entertainment stars are familiar with it, and their social status is well-known.

    And fame and fame, status and honor are not the same. Some scientists are not allowed to publish their experimental reports because they have signed a state confidentiality agreement, and the scientific community also has its own circle, and they also have a reputation and status. Although celebrities do not make substantial contributions, they live in our daily entertainment, this is their job, and it must be widely known, otherwise what is the point of actors?

    However, in terms of its contribution, from the perspective of the overall situation, of course, it is scientists and technical experts from all walks of life. Especially scientists who are fighting in the fields of science and technology, industry, medicine, manufacturing and other fields in major countries. They are not only respected social elites, but also important weapons and pillars of the country.

    It deserves high honor and treatment. However, human society is a complex, and the needs of people are also multifaceted. Imagine that if there is no entertainment performance of entertainment stars, life is boring.

    Artists who are genuine, ethical, ethical, and responsible should also be respected and loved by people.

    Therefore, the status of the so-called two in society and the people, in addition to the continuous adjustment at the national level. In the hearts of the 1.3 billion Chinese people, there is a definite conclusion. For a country to develop, it must have scientists.

    However, in order for the people's lives to be rich and colorful, it is necessary to develop cultural undertakings and have entertainment stars. Cultural and sports undertakings are an important part of spiritual civilization and are as important as material civilization.

    What we should be worried about is not that celebrities have stolen the limelight from scientists, but that we should worry about the transition of entertainment in society.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The status of Chinese scientists is not as good as that of celebrities, which is very chilling, and I think the state should increase the publicity of Chinese scientists.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    That's not true. Scientists are high-tech talents, they need a quiet living and working environment, they don't want to be bothered, they don't want to be disturbed, but it doesn't mean that their status is not as good as that of stars.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    I think this kind of culture needs to be corrected, and fans can follow the stars, but we should take the right measure and learn more about the scientists who have contributed to our lives and our country, and learn from them.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The ranks of scientists are as follows:

    Level 0: The name of the scientist or his or her contribution has been written into the textbooks of primary and secondary schools in many advanced countries This kind of achievement is fundamental and catalytic for the entire human civilization. They are so fundamental that they will be written into primary and secondary school textbooks.

    Newton, Darwin, Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg, these are clear examples. This level of equivalence is the result of a change in mainstream philosophical thought.

    Level 1: The name of a scientist appears in popular science in many advanced countries, and this type of achievement has a wide social impact, or is the object of social attention.

    Level 2: Scientist names appear in university textbooks in many advanced countries.

    Level 3: The name of a scientist appears in the body or substantive citation of a monograph in a field around the world, and the monograph is generally a summary of the important achievements that have been recognized in a field, and its degree of professionalism is higher than that of textbooks.

    Level 4: The scientist's name appears in the text or substantive citation of the world's top 5 journals in the field According to this criterion, if a researcher has only been published in a first-class journal, but has not been substantially cited, he cannot enter Level 4.

    Level 5: The name of the scientific grinder appears in the ** body or substantive citation of 6-50 journals around the world.

    Level 6: The scientist's name appears in the text or substantive citation of the world's top 50 journals or later.

    Level 7: Scientist is now on the list of authors of 1-50 journals in the field.

    Level 8: The scientist's name appears on the list of authors of the world's top 50 journals in the field.

    Level 9: The name of the scientist appears in the ** body or substantive citation of the local professional journal The so-called local professional journal refers to the journal that is not widely circulated internationally. Let's say, for example, a journal in China.

    Level 10: The scientist's name appears in the list of authors in a local professional journal.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    To be precise, it is not a low status, but a low degree. Some people who wish there was no **degree and ** degree less are more natural, and the former seems to have no status.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Scientists control the country's highest-end technology, and they are not known to protect them, and their status is definitely not low, but it is really not clear how much they earn. And celebrities were originally launched to earn people's attention, everything about them is in the eyes of people, and the income is graded. Honestly, these two comparisons are really hard to compare.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It's not that the status of entertainment stars is high, but that the attention of scientists is relatively low, and the degree of ** is relatively low.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    I heard that Chinese women like sissies like Luha.

    Foreign women love muscular guys.

    I don't know if it's true or not.

    Scientists cannot be measured in terms of money.

    The status is unlikely to be low.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    All distorted values that look at money.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The entertainment industry has a lot of publicity.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    This is a false proposition, it depends on what kind of scientists, and what kind of stars, the stars who can be known are generally the elites of their industry, and the scientists who have made significant contributions to society in the country also have due remuneration and attention, and it is not in accordance with the law to let ordinary scientists get too much attention.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Who said that the status of scientists is very low, why do celebrities have so many fans, and some people are not praising them.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    If you don't consider the ancients, you can rank them like this, most of them are the fathers of the two bombs and one star of New China, or the top scientists in the industry:

    Qian Xuesen. Deng Jiaxian.

    Hua Luogeng. Li Siguang.

    Mao Yisheng. Yuan Longping.

    Qian Sanqiang. Yu Min.

    Wang Ganchang. Tu Youyou.

    If you count the ancients, you can rank it like this:

    Qian Xuesen, Xu Guangqi, Zhang Heng, Zu Chongzhi, Deng Jiaxian, Hua Luogeng, Li Siguang, Shen Kuo, Mao Yisheng, Yuan Longping.

    Of course, this is all a personal impression, in fact, it can be said that the ranking is in no particular order. For example, Yuan Longping's contribution to the increase in the world's grain production is unprecedentedly huge, equivalent to keeping billions of people around the world from going hungry. Tu Youyou is a scientist trained by China itself, and her artemisinin has saved tens of millions of lives around the world.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    It is not important to say who is important, it can be said that each has its own importance, celebrities provide entertainment for the public, have a certain propaganda role, scientists work for technology, contribute to national knowledge, and are inventors of human innovation.

    For example: British physicist Isaac Newton, Polish silver-lead physicist Mrs. Currie, American Fengsen good spring scientist Albert Einstein, king of black holes, etc.

    Star: In ancient books, it refers to Venus, in the old days it referred to a famous woman in the social field, and now it refers to a person who has a certain influence in a certain field, and generally refers to famous actors, singers, entertainers, athletes, etc.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    I would choose Yuan Longping and Deng Jiaxian. One of them is the father of Chinese rice, and the other is the father of nuclear missiles. With great dedication to agriculture and national defense, Yuan Longping researched hybrid rice to feed the Chinese.

    And Deng Jia first brought China's national defense to a new level. I think they're the best.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    I will choose Yuan Longping, Yang Zhenning, Deng Jiaxian, Qian Xuesen, and Tu Youyou. Of course, every scientist is great, but these few people have the greatest achievements and contributions.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    If I were to select the best scientists in China, I would choose two, the first is Qian Xuesen, because he is the pioneer of two bombs and one star, because of Qian Xuesen's contribution, China's comprehensive strength has made a qualitative leap, so that Western countries dare not bully China casually, and the second is Yuan Longping, whose hybrid rice technology solves the problem of eating Chinese, which is of great significance to a populous country like China.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    A person's status is determined by fame and money?

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    The status of this star is not said to be higher than that of scientists, but because their popularity is a little higher and their popularity is higher, so they seem to be higher than the low position of scientists, but in fact, an upright person knows that the status of scientists should be higher.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    This can't be compared, isn't it that there is no distinction between high and low professions. But the type of work is different.,You have to divide it and you can never tell the high.

Related questions
7 answers2024-06-19

Different insights and different results.

The scientific research carried out by scientists is specialized in different fields. All scientists who have made achievements, inventions, and monographs have contributed to the country and mankind. The criterion for judging a large contribution is that it has a direct and obvious effect on overcoming the scientific bottlenecks and problems of a country or the world, has made significant achievements in promoting the development of the current social productive forces and economic development, and has made major breakthroughs in improving national defense and military technology. >>>More

16 answers2024-06-19

Now many people don't dream of being scientists, which is a big problem.

17 answers2024-06-19

This is very likely to happen, there are a large number of pulsars in the universe, but due to their weak signals, they are easily overwhelmed by artificial electromagnetic interference, and only a small number of them have been observed so far, they are natural data stations that transmit signalsBut the signal is mottled and noisy, and it doesn't help if humans don't receive the instrument very accurately. >>>More

13 answers2024-06-19

I think it is the physicist Qian Sanqiang and his wife, who are hard-working, hard-working, and patriotic scientists, who deserve our admiration.

4 answers2024-06-19

There are a lot of them on the Internet, so you can look them up yourself.