When two people go out together, do you need to pay for one person s valuables if the other person d

Two people go out together and carry valuables but the other person does not need to be compensated, because he just went out with him as a friend, and he is not responsible.

I think the loss of valuables may have something to do with the other person, but you can't take full responsibility, so both parties are a little bit responsible.

This shouldn't be necessary, although two people go out together, but everyone has to take care of their belongings.

The other person is not responsible, he should take care of his own valuable things, and he can't blame others for what he drops.

When two people go out together, do you need to pay for one person's valuables if the other person drops? There shouldn't be any need to go back, since the two of them should be good friends when they go out together, and he didn't steal it, why do you need the other party to accompany you? Probably their own.

If you don't have this ability, go and pass by your own things.

Two people go out to play together, and one person's valuables are lost and the other person does not have to pay. He has no evidence to prove that you took it, why should you pay it? Besides, people are not afraid of crooked shadows. If you don't take it, you don't take it, why pay for it?

Don't make compensation, because this is his personal problem. It's your problem, so it doesn't matter, just come and go.

Hello, if another person doesn't take it in this case, he will definitely not be responsible.

But the two went out together, but their belongings were kept separately, so why should they accompany the person who lost them?

It depends on whether the other person is at fault, and if there is no fault, there is no need to accompany him.

You shouldn't have to pay for it, because the damage to this thing has nothing to do with you.

Why do you want another person to accompany you, my own life, I don't think I'm optimistic about myself.

In the real case, that person has no responsibility and does not need to be compensated.

See if there is any responsibility, and if you have the responsibility, you will compensate for the corresponding part of the loss.

In this case, if two people go out together, one person loses his valuables, how to make the other person compensate? The other person is not responsible for anything.

In fact, when two people are together, one person's valuables are dropped, and the other person must compensate, because two people are together.

Two people go out together, and one person's valuables are lost and the other person does not need to pay for it. Because there is no direct responsibility with another person.

When two people go out together, one person's valuables are dropped, and the other person does not need to pay compensation, because it is not the responsibility of the other person, so the other person has no responsibility to pay compensation.

There shouldn't be any need to accompany this, because when the two of them go out together, his own valuables are dropped. The other person is not responsible.

When two people go out together, one person's valuables are dropped, and the other person needs to be accompanied? I don't think it's related to another person, it's because your stuff is kept inside, and you can't blame him.

Two people play together, one loses valuables, does the other need to be accompanied? No, he didn't steal.

I think if two people go out together, what does it have to do with one person's valuables and the other person?

If you forget to close the door, you must compensate, because you have no person in charge, and you are derelict in your duties.

Those who come in and steal should be primarily responsible, and those who forget to close the door should be secondarily responsible, and the compensation must be compensated, but it is not enough to say that it is fully compensated.

I think of course you are responsible? After all, it was your negligence that caused the loss of something, so you are responsible for compensating him for the loss.

A company opened by two people in total.

No matter whose fault it is, if you get entangled in the matter of claims, the company can't be opened.

A matter of a hammer, remember that suffering is a blessing, and it is most appropriate to use it here.

Whoever forgets to close the door is responsible, and he should compensate you and the company for the loss.

I feel that I need you to accompany me, after all, it is a company owned by the two of you, and if it is your responsibility, you need to compensate.

It must be the one who talks about the pants, because it is the act of hanging the pants and not the pants that causes the damage, unless another person tells him to hang them, in which case both people are responsible.

It must be a pants hanger, unless there are prerequisites for hanging pants.

I don't think you need to lose money to someone who gets seriously injured in a fall. Because the premise has already been said, it is not the person who is slightly injured who allows the person who is seriously injured to climb over the wall, and from a legal point of view, the person who is slightly injured is not responsible. Therefore, if two people climb over the wall together, the person who is slightly injured does not need to pay the person who falls and is seriously injured.

Probably not, unless the person with a minor injury has instigated or forced the person with a serious injury to climb over the wall, and there is no need to pay money to the person who was seriously injured by the fall.

No, climbing over the wall is voluntary, and it has nothing to do with others, if it is a person with a minor injury, pushing and falling down a seriously injured person, the person with a minor injury must pay compensation to the seriously injured person, and the seriously injured person does not need to pay compensation if he falls over the wall and is slightly injured.

To compensate, because the two people who go over the wall when you go over the wall are responsible. If the other party is seriously injured, the one who is slightly injured will have to pay him money.

If the person who proposes to go over the wall is you, then you will definitely need to lose money, if he proposes it, then you don't need it, or the two of you discuss it together, then you can be responsible for your own medical expenses.

No, because two people don't have primary responsibility and secondary responsibility, each is responsible!

This should be a case-by-case situation, if you ask him to go over the wall, and he is a minor, then you have the responsibility to compensate, if you are both minors or adults, and the matter of going over the wall is the meaning of the two of you together, then there is no responsibility.

This kind of thing has to start over, how old is it, is it still a minor, why go over the wall, whose idea is this, if it is the idea of slightly injuring people, they are all minors, then the guardian of the easy person should be compensated appropriately, if it is the idea of falling into a serious injury, then the minor injury does not need to pay for the serious injury.

Two people climbed the wall, one fell and got seriously injured, and the other fell and got slightly injured, and I think they should each take their own responsibility and should not pay money to the seriously injured.

Personally, I don't think it's necessary in a legal sense. But the moral aspect is not easy to say. After all, morally speaking, people are biased towards the disadvantaged.

From a legal point of view, there is no need for compensation, just look at the specific situation, the reasons and details of your circumvention.

You don't need to be held responsible, because you are a common risk, and of course, if you take the initiative to invite others to climb over the wall, you may bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

You shouldn't let the person who fell lightly have to pay compensation, because it is autonomous, not not. The man made him fall like that. I don't think this person should be allowed to pay compensation.

If two people climb over the wall together, but one person falls and is seriously injured, and the other is slightly injured! The other person needs to pay money to the person who was seriously injured in the fall.

Is a person who falls seriously injured a person who is slightly injured and who makes you climb over the wall? If so, he should pay some money to the person who was seriously injured in the fall.

You shouldn't find someone to compensate, it doesn't make sense, you want to go over the wall, why should you ask someone to ask for it, you're going too far.

The first thing is to divide what is the reason for you to climb over the wall, whether it is a bet or a game or practice, and there are different statements about the losses caused by different reasons. For specific analysis of specific issues, you can also go to the court to sue for a lawsuit.

It mainly depends on what is the relationship between these two people, what are they going to do, who is the mastermind and who is the accomplice? The mastermind is undoubtedly primarily responsible!

This situation is really a bit difficult to do, when you encounter unreasonable people, you really have to ask for money, in this case, you can't say that you are slightly injured, it is possible that their family will feel that you are responsible for trying to make money.

It's all hurt, and it's okay if it's not intentional.

For such a professional legal issue, it is recommended that you find a professional lawyer from a law firm who believes that it is more appropriate to consult.

There is no responsibility, the two of you don't go, she doesn't necessarily go, under the inducement of the two of you, or under the teaching, coaxing, embarked on a dangerous situation, which led to serious consequences, but this is all reasonable, and there is no legal responsibility, if the person is not an adult or has a mental retardation, it is another matter.

The following answer is provided by "Jinan Business Lawyer", if you need Hongzhou to paraphrase, please indicate the source: The concealment you said in the question is not very clear, if your property is lost because there is evidence to prove that the other party took it, then of course the other party will be liable. If it is because of the loss of property caused by tearing each other in the process of everyone, you will not be able to claim compensation.

If something happens due to reasons related to the partnership, you are also 50% responsible.

I don't know what happened to the "accident" you talked about?

Of course, this has to be borne by the work, so the medical expenses must be borne in one installment.

No, you don't. Because both of you are victims. The claimant you are looking for is the one who lied to you, not the partner!

No, you are all victims, and your losses are compensated by the perpetrators.

Look at how the contract is written, if there is no constraint, there is none.

If two people buy something together, they should divide it equally, and if one of them wants to take it first, he can only take his own share, but it is better for two people to take it together.

No, both parties paid for it, and it must be taken with the consent of the other party.

I'm glad to answer this question for you, and I see your description of this problem, and my personal opinion and advice to you is this: First of all, you describe something that two people buy together, and one of them can take it, and then you can see the description that you add, and you take your part, and then without his consent, you don't know, you can see your description of the problem, so first of all, it's okay to take your own part, but I think it's better to talk to him Because you talk to him and show more respect for him, because after you take it, he may come back and see why it's gone, and he thinks someone else took it, so he will be very worried and anxious.