If the elderly can t be cured, and there is no money for treatment, and the family gives up, is it i

What's so illegal about this, it's normal for people to live, grow old, sick and die, especially the elderly, the body's resistance becomes poor, they will get sick, some diseases go to the hospital**, the doctor will also say that the body is too weak to be suitable for **can only be conservative** and the like, so it is to put pressure on the family The economic pressure to see a doctor is too great, for ordinary families, I am afraid that the money is spent on a debt, and in the end there is no cure, this is the most sad, if your financial ability is limited, There is no need for the condition, I personally think that this is not **, it is nothing, it is not illegal, but from your heart, and the moral level makes you feel sorry for it!

It's not illegal because you don't have the money to pull a lot of patients home If you don't have money, you can consider asking for donations to find **help This is also a way to raise money If it's cancer, it's useless to spend more money Then it's no way to give up It's not illegal.

Personally, I don't think this situation counts, and you have to do what you can to save people when you are sick, and you can't force them to be treated because they are beyond your ability. The key point is that even if the family wants to save it, the hospital may give an ultimatum to the family because the cost cannot keep up.

Therefore, since it is impossible to cure the elderly, let's do it according to the situation of your own family.

It's not illegal. In this case, it is entirely a matter for the patient's family to decide on their own, and is not bound by law.

In the case you said, I think that the family has done their best, and it can be counted, so be it.

Not counted. Since it can't be cured, and ** is not necessarily a good thing for the elderly, ** the trauma may be greater. So giving up is not not to give **, but it is possible that it is the best choice for the elderly and children, and it is best to let the elderly leave peacefully accompanied by their families.

It is not illegal, it is a matter of filial piety, the old man is sick, although the family has no money for treatment, he can apply for assistance from the local ** at all levels, but also to the old man**, can not be ignored, this is unfilial.

As long as the old man agrees, it is not illegal, because there is no money at home This is a fact, even if the old man's illness is not cured, it is better to take the old man home and let him live the rest of his life, as long as he negotiates with the old man, he himself has no objection, this does not exist this illegal crime, it is necessary to discuss with the old man, as long as he does not abandon it.

It's not illegal, in fact, don't force it if you can't do it, and in the end, if you don't have people and money, you still have to say that the patient will suffer a lot in vain.

The elderly have been diagnosed and cured if they are sick, and they have no money, and it is not illegal for their families to give up. It's just that children will feel that they have not fulfilled their filial piety to the elderly, which is a pity.

Of course, it's not illegal. This is something that no one wants to see. No money ** does exist. Therefore, you should buy insurance in case of a sudden critical illness.

It is not a violation. But you must do your best enough, if you really can't support it, then you can only take it home and treat the elderly well.

This is not illegal, everyone wants their elderly to be healthy, but the amount of money spent on sick treatment is relatively large, and many times it is not enough.

It's not illegal, because everyone's ability is limited, and no one wants such an accident to happen. It's better to do things according to reality, what can you do if you don't have the ability? It's okay if you've done your best, just have a clear conscience and don't care too much about what others think.

If this is the case, of course, it is not illegal to give up, after all, there are no economic conditions.

It's not illegal, but we have to be worthy of our conscience, and if we don't let it, we may be extremely guilty and sad in the future.

Hello, I'm glad to have your problem, this situation like yours is not illegal, this can only be a moral problem, I think if it really can't be cured, then don't toss anymore.

This, of course, is not illegal, because there is no preposition, so it is impossible to break the law.

This is a reality of the situation. This treatment is also done within one's means, as long as enough ** and expenses are carried out in the early stage, it has nothing to do with illegality.

Although it is not illegal, it is necessary to actively strive for the quality of life of the elderly, and I am really helping you look forward to it

Incurable disease, no money to give up**, of course, is not illegal.

This is not illegal, it can only be said that there is nothing to be done.

Not illegal! But it's sad!

This is also helpless!

No, the law stipulates that it is not prohibited by law.

Although it may indeed be an inappropriate, inappropriate behavior. But as a family member, this is my own relatives after all, and sometimes giving up ** is also a painful choice in my heart, and I finally have to do it as a last resort.

Because since it is a terminal disease, that is to say, under the current medical conditions, life can only be extended to a limited extent, but there is no possibility of **.

In the end, the family invested all their financial and material resources into this bottomless pit, and there was no substantial change, but the living still have to survive and live.

Unless there is a mine at home, how many people are able to support long-term medical care now?

No, I think the family will not be willing to give up if there are conditions, there is really no way to give up, even if you don't give up, what can you do, this kind of pain can only be felt by the person concerned, no matter what you do, outsiders have no right to blame.

Strictly speaking, count. But this is that birth, old age, sickness and death cannot be controlled by human beings, the family has given up, and in general, no one cares about their family affairs.

This is not illegal, if you have a terminal illness, you want to **, you have to be within the range of financial affordability, you can't afford to see a doctor if you don't have money!

Hello, if the elderly or children have a terminal illness and the family gives up, is it illegal? It's not illegal to give up**, but Yu Xinyu is not far away, whether it is an old man or a child, as long as there is a glimmer of hope, you have to go**, thank you!

It's not illegal, but I can't get over it in my heart, but it also scores some diseases, such as cancer. It's also normal to give up!

If the doctor declares that the ** rate of this disease is very small, the choice is given to the patient's family, and it is not illegal for the family to choose to give up**.

If you have an incurable disease, if your relatives at home can't bear to give up, it is also a last resort, not an illegal act.

This is not illegal, due to family conditions and economic conditions, it is impossible to give up**.

If the family conditions are not good, it is normal and rational to give up ** if you have a terminal illness, and it is not illegal.

If it is not good and the party does give up, there is no need to pay legal responsibility.

If children and the elderly are terminally ill and don't give **, shouldn't it be illegal? Because some diseases can't be cured, you can give up.

If there is really no chance of rescue, it is not illegal to give up**, how can it be related to illegality.

If a family member is seriously ill, it is only a violation of the law not to give, and if the family conditions do not allow it, it should also be conservative**.

Not counted. It is not stipulated by law.

This doesn't count, but it's better to communicate with the patient and see what you think, it's not necessary if it's too painful.

It shouldn't be counted, but it depends on my wishes.

This has nothing to do with the law, there is nothing illegal that is not illegal.

Hello. Giving up is a helpless choice.

Either you can't.

Either the financial capacity is not good.

But it's not illegal.

Whether it is an adult or a child, as long as there is one percent hope, the family must take it and don't give up, he is also a life.

If the elderly or children have a terminal illness and the family gives up, shouldn't it be considered illegal, right? Does the law provide for this?

Illegal. Unless the parents give up**, they don't want the burden of their children. Children have the legal obligation to support the elderly, if the children have difficulties in supporting, they can seek help from residents' committees, villagers' committees and lawfully established organizations for the elderly, and can apply for local assistance.

The Marriage Law stipulates that children have the obligation to support their parents, and when the children fail to fulfill their maintenance obligations, parents who are unable to work or have difficulties in living have the right to demand maintenance from their children. The obligation of a child to support his or her parents occurs not only between a legitimate child and his or her parents, but also between an illegitimate child and his or her biological parents, between an adopted child and his or her adoptive parents, and between a stepchild and a stepparent who has fulfilled the obligation of support and education.

Article 6 of the Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of the Elderly is the common responsibility of the whole society to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the elderly. State organs, social groups, enterprises, and public institutions shall, in accordance with their respective duties, do a good job of efforts to protect the rights and interests of the elderly. Residents' committees, villagers' committees, and lawfully established organizations for the elderly shall reflect the demands of the elderly, preserve the lawful rights and interests of the elderly, and serve the elderly.

Legal analysis: No, the law is not strong, it is difficult! Waiver is an option that is not considered to create or increase a risk that is not impermissible by law and therefore has no criminal causal link.

Legal basis: "Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases" Article 17: Where a victim suffers personal injury, the compensation obligor shall compensate for all expenses incurred due to medical treatment** and the loss of income due to lost work, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal subsidies, and necessary nutrition expenses. Where the victim is disabled due to injury, the compensation obligor shall also compensate for the necessary expenses incurred by the victim due to the increase in living needs and the loss of income caused by the loss of the ability to work, including disability compensation, disability assistive devices, and living expenses of dependents, as well as the necessary expenses, nursing expenses, and follow-up expenses actually incurred due to the care and continuation.

If you really don't sell your money, it doesn't count, and it is difficult for people to be forced by the law. Waiver** is a choice, not abandonment, which is not considered to create or increase a risk that is not impermissible by law, and therefore has no criminal causal link. However, if the parents have the financial ability to pay the fees and do not treat the child, it is an act of abuse and abandonment, and causing the death of the child may be suspected of the crime of abandonment, which is a crime.

In addition, if you deliberately do not give the child **, knowing that it may die and ignore it, you may be suspected of intentional homicide, depending on the actual situation.

Legal basis: Article 261 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China Where an old, young, sick, or other person who has no ability to live independently, who has an obligation to support a person who refuses to do so, and the circumstances are heinous, is to be sentenced to up to five years imprisonment, short-term detention, or controlled release.