The chairman of Lege Co., Ltd. blocked Ping An Asset Management, what happened between the two of th

The chairman of Lege Co., Ltd. blocked Ping An Asset Management, and the two of them had a conflict because of the issue of capital investment. Xiang Lehong, chairman of Lege Group, believes that the managers of Ping An Asset Management are arrogant and have a bad attitude towards them, and they do not respect the founder of the group at all. Zhang Liang, manager of Ping An Asset Management, also responded in the circle of friends, saying that he did not know that he had "offended" the chairman of Lege Group, and that he had done his job conscientiously and carefully, and was very cautious about this investment, and he also conducted a series of investigations on this.

Xiang Lehong, chairman of Lege Group, is an EMBA executive MBA of Peking University and an EMBA executive MBA of Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business, and in 2010, he served as the chairman of Lege Video Technology Co., Ltd., and the company increased its holdings to more than 30 yuan a share from just listed and issued, and paid more than 80 million out of pocket to support it in the most difficult time for the company. Courage to innovate, Legge Group began to set foot in foreign manufacturing in 2015, until it paid off in Vietnam in 2019.

As the founder of the group, he pays great attention to the development of the company and the industry he invests in, and he also knows that investment is a tool that can make quick money. But it doesn't mean that Ping An Asset Management can be so arrogant and rude, it didn't come to the company for research at all, and it didn't pay attention to the company's culture. Zhang Liang, manager of Ping An Asset Management, said that he conducted research on the 29th, listened to the speech of the chairman's secretary and the chairman, and basically understood the company's development trajectory.

Ping An Asset Management respects all the founders and will be very cautious in cooperating with the company, hoping to better and better understand each other so that we can develop better. Ping An Asset Management is not afraid to ask questions, and will definitely ask those who should ask, and if you don't ask this time, you will definitely make up for it next time. The above is the conflict between these two companies, and the specific situation needs to be further investigated.

Xiang Lehong, chairman of Lege Co., Ltd., spoke again in the WeChat circle of friends, saying that he wanted to replay all the process of the previous day, "The other party is untrue, and there is no modesty in the article at all." At the end of the article, Xiang Lehong said that the human elements of the conference are insufficient, which is easy to cause misunderstanding; This incident should be understood as an accidental incident, and it is hoped that those who will come to the company for research in the future will prepare in advance.

There was a conflict in the conversation, because Chairman Lege thought that the service attitude of Ping An Asset Management was very bad, so he blocked it.

There were problems in the cooperation between the two, and there were also problems in capital investment, and the chairman of Lege believed that Ping An Asset Management did not respect him.

Because of the conflict over capital investment, Xiang Lehong, chairman of Lege Group, believes that the managers of Ping An Asset Management are arrogant and have a bad attitude towards them.

In fact, there are some contradictions, and there are some conflicts of interest, so there is such an approach.

The chairman was too arrogant, because he said that the reason for the blackout was that Ping An Asset Management had a bad attitude towards him, but Ping An Asset Management said that he was very puzzled.

It is not possible to have professional competence in the capital market. Ping An Asset Management's professional ability has been questioned by the chairman of Lege.

I think this matter is quite unbelievable, or the other party is carrying a big black cauldron.

On the evening of August 29, Xiang Lehong, chairman of Lege Co., Ltd., a listed company on the GEM, posted an article in the circle of friendsquestioned the professionalism of the manager of Ping An Asset Management, and said that he would "black" Ping An Asset Management from then onThe manager of Ping An Asset Management is not welcome to invest in the company.

Xiang Lehong said that the young manager of Ping An Asset Management, who was temporarily notified of the need for investigation, had an arrogant and condescending attitude, and had never been to Lege's factory, had not interviewed Lege's grassroots employees, and did not know anything about the company's continuous improvement of products and business institutions in the past few years, although its revenue had not increased.

On the evening of the same day, Xiang Lehong first posted in the circle of friends, saying, "Lege does not welcome the ** manager of Ping An Asset Management to invest in the company", and then publicly mentioned on Weibo that he and the secretary of the board of directors were notified to ** contact the ** manager of Ping An Asset Management together, and finally the investigation broke up unhappily.

On August 29, because of the news of a "** manager", Xiang Lehong, chairman of Lege Co., Ltd., "went out of the circle" from the field of listed companies and became popular. In the evening of the same day,Xiang Lehong posted in the circle of friends, "Lege does not welcome the ** manager of Ping An Asset Management to invest in the company".

Through my many receptions, I feel that most of them want to make quick money, and almost nothing is willing to go to the factory to see the assembly line and see the process", "why not conduct in-depth research on the company" In the open letter released, Xiang Lehong questioned the ** research many times.

Zhang Liang, manager of Ping An Asset Management, said that he did not disrespect the chairman of Lege, and followed his professional ethics to defend and dismantle it, and did careful research, and did not know where he "offended" Lege Group. Xiang Lehong, chairman of Lege, received the investment manager, he described that the post-80s and post-90s managers of Ping An Asset Management did not respect their founders at all, although the investment can make quick money, but I hope that all the investment managers can go deep into the grassroots factories of their own enterprises when they investigate, not just look at the superficial things.

Ping An Asset Management disagreed with Chairman Lege's statement. First of all, as an investment manager of Ping An Asset Management, he is not very young, he has been engaged in the speculative industry for more than ten years, and he has the ability, strength and experience. Zhang Liang, manager of Ping An Asset Management, said that he had a cautious attitude in cooperating with Lege this time, and the questions he raised were considered, and it was also for better development and becoming a good partner.

Secondly, the research manager of Ping An Asset Management went to Lege Group for research and inspection, and it was not nonsense. On the 29th, Ping An Asset Management has conducted a survey on the first day, and listened to the introduction of the chairman's secretary for 15 minutes and the chairman's introduction for 30 minutes. Ping An Zao Asset Management has an understanding of the development status and operating industry of Lege Group, and there is no situation where there is no research.

In the end, the questions raised by Ping An Asset Management are all issues considered by the company, and there is no arrogance and prejudice in making judgments. Why is the economic growth rate of Lege Group slow in the first two years, and even a downward trend, and what is the reason? Lege Group has benefited from the epidemic, how much room for development will it have in the future?

Isn't this straightforward, and one that the Group is concerned about? The manager of Ping An Asset Management replied to the chairman of the board of directors in the circle of friends, indicating that as a company in the investment industry, the questions that should be asked will definitely be asked, and if you don't ask this time, you will ask it next time. These two companies are in the circle of friends, if you want to know what the follow-up will be, please continue to pay attention!

Zhang Liang, a party to Ping An Asset Management, said that they went to the site and did their homework, and the chairman asked about the slowdown in growth.

Ping An Asset Management responded that it was regretful and did not understand why it was done because they did not offend the chairman of Lege.

Ping An Asset Management's response to this incident was that the chairman of the other party did not tell the truth, and the ** manager of his own company conducted an investigation.

He was very wronged. He also didn't expect that his actions would cause confusion to Lege, and he said that he would continue to pay attention.

It's still more wrong, because this matter has no connection with the other party, and as a result, it was blocked.

In fact, the chairman who was blocked was really wronged, and there were many things that caused a misunderstanding, and he was finally blocked, and he was humiliated.