After the divorce was done, the court came out at the door and fought at the door, did it have any i

If the husband and wife are divorced, and the husband and wife quarrel at the door of the court and escalate, it shows that the relationship between the husband and wife is broken down, and there is no possibility of recovery, and the court should be resolutely asked to divorce on this ground, if the defendant is unwilling to divorce, then the fight is unfavorable to the defendant, especially if the defendant is sued by the plaintiff for a history of domestic violence, the fight can basically be used as one of the supporting evidence of domestic violence, especially if the plaintiff is injured because of the fight, the court basically grants a divorce for domestic violence, and will not go to slow mediation.

If both husband and wife agree to divorce, but there are different opinions on the distribution of property, the division of property will not be affected by fighting.

The legal status of divorce is equal, and the defendant is not equal to being tried. If you fight at the door, you may face public security penalties; For divorce cases, evidence of marital discord and domestic violence is added, and under normal circumstances, the court will not grant a divorce with a single lawsuit, but it is difficult to say about domestic violence.

Overall, this did not have much impact on the outcome of the trial. Just affect your personal image. In fact, fighting a war will not solve the problem. We have already taken up the law to protect ourselves, so why be so impulsive?

After the divorce is done, the court comes out at the door and fights at the door, does it have any impact on the defendant? It will have an impact, whether it is a husband and wife or not, it cannot be solved by force, which will cause deeper conflicts between husband and wife.

This has little effect on the outcome of the divorce judgment. It's just a public order case. The detention is detained. The fine is a fine.

Actually, it shouldn't have much of an impact. There must be a difference of opinion. It's just that it's easy for me to fight if there is any contradiction between the two sides. But it's better to be sensible in this kind of thing. Look at others using you as a lever.

The brawl may lead to criminal detention, but as for the fact that it has no positive impact on the divorce, it can only show that the relationship between the two parties has indeed broken down.

Seriously, fighting at the door of the courthouse will definitely affect the judge's impression of the individual. It still has a little influence on the trial.

It depends on whose fault is greater, who does it first and who deliberately provokes the conflict? It's not the same, who else is seriously injured, who is the injured party, and the party at fault has an impact, but whether it has an impact on the defendant is not necessarily, your situation netizens don't know what happened, and they can't analyze the reasons for you.

If you are divorced and still beat someone, you will call the police and let the law deal with it, which will cause major harm to the defendant's heart.

You can call the police if you hit someone! One yard to one yard thing. This is also one of the reasons why a divorce is necessary.

The two of them are too numerous, even if they leave, they will leave and forget what to fight, and both sides will not have a good impact

I got a divorce. And the door of the court of judgment came out, and it grew big at the door. What is the impact on the defendant? The defendant will be detained for 15 days.

Went to the door of the courtroom to get the divorce and came out and got up at the door. It will certainly affect the defendant. This will be dealt with as appropriate.

It depends on whether it is a civil case or a criminal case. If it is a criminal case, the defendant's family will be informed of the date.

If there is a person in the court who specifically records words and deeds, this person is the court clerk.

This record is called the trial record, and finally the plaintiff, the defendant, the judge, and the presiding judge must review and sign it.

No. He was seated when he made his statement and when the final verdict was pronounced.

If you don't know much about it, you can ask a lawyer.

Criminal cases are pending.

The adjudicator will ask the defendant about the process of committing the crime and his attitude towards admitting guilt, which are important to the case.

The adjudicators must verify the details and important circumstances related to sentencing, and the specific questions to ask should be determined on the basis of the complexity of the case. At the beginning of the trial, the adjudicator will check the defendant's identity information to see if it is the defendant himself, and then the prosecutor will read the indictment, and the adjudicator will ask the defendant, "Do the facts alleged in the indictment exist?" Is the charge convicted?

Is there a voluntary confession? After that, the prosecutor will interrogate the defendant about matters related to the case, and then the defender, the lawyer, will ask the defendant again, and at the end of the trial, the defendant's final statement, such as a confession of guilt and repentance.

**In the process, the judge leads the progress of the case and asks both parties to make statements and provide evidence on the factual part of the case.

Article 137** of the Civil Procedure Law Before trial, the clerk shall ascertain whether the parties and other litigation participants have appeared in court and announce court discipline.

**At trial, the presiding judge shall check the parties, announce the cause of action, announce the list of adjudicators and clerks, and inform the parties of the relevant litigation.

rights and obligations, and ask whether the parties have filed an application for recusal.

Article 138:Courtroom investigations are to be conducted in the following order:

1) Statements of the parties;

2) Inform witnesses of their rights and obligations, testify against witnesses, and read out the testimony of witnesses who have not appeared in court;

3) Presentation of documentary evidence, physical evidence, audio-visual materials, and electronic data;

4) Read out the appraisal opinions;

5) Read out the inquest record.

Article 139:Parties may present new evidence in court.

With the court's permission, parties may ask questions of witnesses, evaluators, or inquest personnel.

Where parties request a new investigation, evaluation, or inquest, the people's court is to decide whether to approve it.

Article 140:Where the plaintiff adds a claim, the defendant submits a counterclaim, and a third party submits a claim related to the case, it may be combined for trial.

Article 141:Courtroom debates are to be conducted in the following order:

1) The plaintiff and his litigant speak out;

2) The defendant and his litigant's defense;

3) The third party and their litigants make a speech or defense;

4) Debate with each other.

At the conclusion of the courtroom debate, the presiding judge is to solicit the final opinions of all parties in the order of the plaintiff, defendant, and third party.

Article 142:At the conclusion of courtroom debate, a judgment shall be made in accordance with law. Where mediation can be made before the judgment, mediation may also be conducted, but mediation is not.

where it is successful, a judgment shall be made in a timely manner.

There is generally no restriction on the number of dependents.

Rules of the People's Courts of the People's Republic of China

Article 9: Citizens may observe public court hearings.

When the number of observer seats cannot meet the needs, the people's court may issue an observer ticket based on the order of the application or through methods such as drawing lots or lottery, but shall give priority to arranging for the parties' close relatives or other persons with an interest in the case to observe.

The following persons are not allowed to observe:

1) Witnesses, evaluators, and persons with specialized knowledge who are preparing to appear in court to submit opinions;

2) Minors who have not obtained the approval of the people's courts;

3) Persons who refuse to submit to security checks;

4) Persons who are intoxicated, mentally ill or otherwise in an abnormal mental state;

5) Other persons who might endanger courtroom security or obstruct courtroom order.

No unit or individual may organize personnel to observe public trial activities where criminal records might be sealed in accordance with law.

Except as otherwise provided by law, no one may observe trial activities that are not open to public in accordance with law.

Rules of the People's Courts of the People's Republic of China

Article 10: People's courts shall make video or audio recordings of the entire trial activities.

1) The degree of public concern is relatively high;

2) The social impact is relatively large;

3) The significance of publicity and education on the rule of law is relatively strong.

Article 12: Personnel appearing in court to perform their duties are to dress in accordance with professional dress regulations. However, formal attire is required in any of the following circumstances:

a) There is no professional dress code;

2) Investigators appear in court to testify;

3) The unit to which they belong is a party to the case.

Persons appearing in court and observers who are not performing their duties shall dress civilly.

Article 13: When criminal detained defendants or appellants appear in court for trial, they are to wear formal or civilian clothes, and do not wear the identification uniforms of the regulatory agencies.

People's courts must not use restraints on defendants or appellants during trial activities, except where they find that their personal danger is great and might endanger courtroom security.

Article 14: Before trial activities begin, clerks shall announce the courtroom discipline provided for in article 17 of these Rules.

In criminal trials, the number of family members of the defendant is generally not restricted, and for cases that have a large impact and involve a wide range of people, where there may be more than one observer, the court will use the observer card to control the entry of observers.

The following persons are not allowed to observe:

Minors (except with court approval).

Mentally ill and drunk.

Others who are not suitable to observe.

No audio, video and photographic recordings are allowed.

They are not allowed to move around or enter the trial area at will.

No speeches or questions are allowed.

There must be no applause, noise, commotion, or other conduct that obstructs trial activities.

The law does not have a uniform provision on the number of observers during the trial, and the number of observers needs to be determined according to the actual situation.

In accordance with the rules of the people's courts of the People's Republic of China, Article 8: Citizens may observe cases that are tried in public; Based on circumstances such as the courtroom venue and the number of participants, when necessary, enter the courtroom with an observer card issued by the people's court.

There is no limit to the number of family participants, but it must be ensured that it is quiet during the period, cannot move around, and the mobile phone is set to silent mode.

**, depending on the capacity of the courtroom and other participants, several persons may participate without interfering with others.

It depends on the circumstances of the case.

Article 8 of the Rules of the People's Courts and Divisions: Citizens may observe cases that are tried in public; Based on circumstances such as the courtroom venue and the number of participants, when necessary, enter the courtroom with an observer card issued by the people's court.

Where, on the basis of circumstances such as the courtroom and the number of participants in the hearing, observers need to enter the courtroom with an observer card, the people's court is to prepare and issue the observer card.

For the relatives of the parties, there is no specific number of people, and consultations may be held with the presiding judge.

After the chief judge announces the conclusion of courtroom debate, the collegial panel shall ensure that the defendant fully exercises the right to make a final statement. Expert.

1. If the defendant is at the end.

If one's own opinion is repeated multiple times in the statement, the presiding judge may stop it.

2. If the content of the statement is contempt for the court or the public prosecutor, harms the public interest of others or society, or has nothing to do with the case, it shall be stopped.

3. In cases tried in public, where the content of the defendant's final statement involves state secrets or personal privacy, it shall also be stopped.

4. Where the defendant submits new facts or evidence in his final statement, and the collegial panel finds that it might affect the correct judgment, the courtroom investigation shall be resumed. If the defendant submits new reasons for defense, the collegial panel may resume courtroom debate if it finds it truly necessary.

Courtroom debate shall be conducted in the following order under the chairmanship of the chief judge:

1) The prosecutor speaks;

2) Speeches by the victim and his litigant;

3) the defendant defends himself;

4) Defender's defense;

5) The prosecution and defense debate.