How does observation affect the microcosm?

Observing an object will cause a certain impact on the object, but the degree of impact is large and small, and it can be imaged after the impact, thus affecting the microscopic world.

Observed with microscopes and theoretical knowledge, etc. The microscopic world was observed through the invention of the microscope and theoretical research.

It can be said that careful observation affects all living things in the world, and after exploring the universe, people have begun to be more curious about the world in which those microorganisms live.

In fact, it is more accurate to observe some things through time, and it also gives people a shocking feeling, which is very exciting.

Time cannot be seen or touched, but it is one of the most basic elements of the world. Time is a relatively abstract concept, which is the expression of the movement of matter, the continuity of change, and the sequentiality. Physics is almost entirely temporally symmetrical at the microscopic level, which means that the laws of physics remain true even after the direction of the flow of time is reversed.

But at the macro level, it doesn't seem to be the case: there is a clear direction in time.

The thermodynamic time arrow comes from the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of an isolated system can only increase over time, not decrease. Entropy is considered a measure of disorder, so the second law implies a temporal direction specified by the change in the degree of order of an isolated system (i.e., the system always becomes more and more disordered as time passes). This asymmetry can be used to distinguish between the past and the future.

In other words, siloed systems will become more and more disordered in the future.

In their latest experiment, they used a quantum computer to "turn back time," just as the billiard balls scattered on the table returned to the starting point of their original triangular arrangement.

Dr. Gordai Lesvigi, principal investigator and head of the Laboratory for Quantum Information Physics at the Institute of Physical Sciences and Technology (MIPT) in Moscow, Russia, said: "We have artificially created a state that evolves in the opposite direction to the thermodynamic arrow of time. ”

They use a quantum computer made of electronic "qubits." A qubit is the basic unit of information for a quantum computer, described by a "1", "0", or a hybrid "superposition" of the two.

In the experiment, they initiated an "evolutionary program" that put the qubits into a state of increasing complexity of 1 and 0 changes. In the process, the qubits lose order, like a billiard ball that has been set up and is struck and scattered everywhere. But then, another program modifies the state of the quantum computer so that it evolves "backwards" from chaotic to ordered, meaning that the qubits return to their initial state.

The researchers found that when two qubits were used, the success rate of "time reversal" was 85%; And when using 3 qubits, the success rate** is 50%. They believe that error rates are expected to decrease as the complexity of the equipment used increases.

It is worth noting that time is "almost completely temporally symmetrical at the microscopic level", which means in layman's terms: as the scale decreases, the probability of an event occurring in the opposite direction gradually approaches the probability of a positive occurrence. When the scale is very small, we consider the two to be approximately equal.

Therefore, it is not surprising that the experiment only exists in the quantum realm to achieve "time reversal", and it is only "inconceivable" to achieve "time reversal" in the macroscopic world.

Time exists in the microcosm, and although the influence of microcosm is very small and almost imperceptible, it actually exists, but we can't feel it.

Existence, just as we are three-dimensional and have our own time, and ants are two-dimensional, and they also have their own schedule.

Time certainly exists, and there is a more accurate time to carry out on the microcosm.

Human observation has changed the microcosm. We all know that in high school political textbooks and Marxist philosophy, there is a classic assertion that "the objective world is not subject to man's subjective will." This is almost one of the foundations of the materialist view that we have learned.

However, the development of a scientific theory in the last century has surprised many scholars. Among them, there are some extremely famous scientists who can be called the process of human civilization: Einstein, Schrödinger and others.

They invariably used their authority and discourse to suppress this new view;

However, time has finally proved it right. What exactly is this new theory? It is the "Copenhagen interpretation" of quantum mechanics.

In other words, the state of existence of the quantum world; Determined by human observation. That's right, human observation has actually changed the entire microcosm.

We all know that quantum itself is uncertain and completely random. Moreover, this kind of "randomness" does not contain any variables unknown to human beings, that is, it is simply "completely random", which we have already found from the proof of "Bell's inequality".

It is precisely for this reason that Einstein, who founded quantum mechanics, parted ways with Bohr and others. He has a classic quote called "I can't accept that God is rolling the dice". But it is. Quantum when it is not observed by us;

No one can be sure in what way it exists. Perhaps, they simply leave the space we are in: this is Stephen Hawking's view. When we observe the quantum, its microcosm really "collapses" and is determined.

Does this make many friends think of the "negative example" that our political teachers often cite to criticize in our high school career, and the allusion that if you close your eyes, you will be grateful? In fact, this is really a correct scientific theory, similar to "Schrödinger's cat".

The fact that the Western blind and unintentional scientific is actually the dumbest and stupidest thing. The empirical methods they use are naturally the patent of fools.

The essence of observation is that photons hit the object being observed** and come back into the eye or instrument for imaging, so we see the object. Observe structures that have the potential to disrupt the microcosm.

Observation can help us better understand the microcosm, which in turn can help the microcosm develop better.

Observation has a great impact on the microcosm, and observation can allow us to go deep into the microcosm, understand the microcosm, and know a different magical place!

Does observation interfere with the evolutionary process of the microcosm? It turns out that the mystery is hidden here.

The three major discoveries that unravel the microcosm of matter are:

The discovery and application of X-rays, the discovery of electrons, the discovery and application of radioactivityX-rays are the flow of particles produced by the transition of electrons in an atom between two energy levels with a huge difference in energy, and are electromagnetic waves with wavelengths between ultraviolet and rays. Its wavelength is very short, about between angstroms. It was discovered by the German physicist Roentgen in 1895, so it is also known as Roentgen rays.

An electron is one of the subatomic particles with a unit negative charge, usually labeled e. Electrons belong to the leptonic class and interact with other particles by gravity, electromagnetism, and weak nuclear forces. Leptons are one of the basic particles that make up matter, i.e. they cannot be broken down into smaller particles.

Electrons and positrons collide to repel each other, creating more than one pair of photons in the process. The electrons are negatively charged, revolve around the nucleus, and the electron interaction force moving at the speed of light in the same direction is zero.

Radioactivity refers to the phenomenon in which an element spontaneously emits rays from an unstable nucleus, such as rays, rays, rays, etc., and decays to form a stable element and stops emitting (decay products), which is called radioactivity. The energy emitted during decay is called decay energy. Elements with atomic number 83 (bismuth) or above are radioactive, but some elements with atomic number less than 83, such as technetium, are also radioactive.