80 points are eager to understand the master of traffic accident liability handling

Personally, I think that the van is mainly or fully responsible for the accident, and the motorcycle and bicycle are not responsible for the accident, which should consider whether there is a red light run, etc. The specific depends on the identification of the traffic police department.

Because the van hit the tail box, the van should be mainly or fully responsible, if the motorcycle is running normally, then the motorcycle is not responsible, the bicycle is normal driving will not be responsible, and the individual believes that the van should bear full responsibility for the accident.

The van should be responsible for the collision with you, because the intersection without a signal should give way to the vehicle on the right, and the right side of the van is your direction if it is a community road.

The bike depends on where it comes from. In general, you and the van are responsible for any damage to your bike. If the other party is bold, the responsibility can be left alone.

Personally, I think: in the diagram you gave, it is not given whether the road surface is marked? Is it a "D" junction?

If there is no other road next to the intersection of the community in the figure, the direction of the car must be in the direction of the motorcycle, which is also said to turn and turn to go straight; If there is a marking, the motorcycle is hit on the right side of the road and falls to the ground, and hits the bicycle; In this case, the van is fully responsible.

1. If the other party shows proof that he has worked in the town for more than one year, he can request the disability compensation according to the urban household registration.

2. The other party can produce evidence when suing, and the mediation before filing a lawsuit can not take evidence.

3. There is no time limit for disability assessment, and there is no basis for the insurance company's requirements, in fact, the earlier the disability assessment, the better it is for you, because the loss of time pay will be less.

4.I suggest that you add the insurance company as a co-defendant, so as to facilitate enforcement (in fact, the insurance company often underpays the insured for various absurd reasons, and I have sued the insurance company several times). If the other party sues you, you can directly submit an application to the court to add a co-defendant, or perhaps the plaintiff will add the insurance company as a co-defendant when the plaintiff sues.

5. If your company does not have someone who is familiar with the law, it is recommended that you hire a lawyer, after all, there is still a lot of professional knowledge in litigation.

6. The appraisal fee and litigation fee shall be borne by the loser.

If you can tolerate it, I suggest that your company try to reach an agreement with the injured person. After all, no amount of money can make up for the pain of being injured and hospitalized. To the court, maybe you will give more.

Short answer for reference: 1. Traffic accidents are not divided into urban or rural areas according to the trial practice in Inner Mongolia, but you should also review the valid proof that he lives in the city; 2. If the information is incomplete, it is the plaintiff's business, and it is not a bad thing for you; 3. The identification of disability is generally 3 months after discharge, and it is not necessary to be subject to the restriction of half a year; 4. According to the Tort Liability Law, when the driver of the unit causes a traffic accident due to work reasons, the responsibility shall be borne by the unit; 5. The defendant may apply in writing to the court to add the insurance company as the defendant in this case, but whether the court agrees to it is another matter; The ordinary procedure shall be submitted within the defense period, and the summary procedure shall be submitted before **; When the court agrees to join, it is to serve a summons on the insurance company; 6. In general, the opinions of the insurance company and you are basically the same, but it is also necessary to analyze the specific problems and cannot be generalized. 7. The appraisal fee and litigation fee shall be borne by the losing party.

8. After the other party files a lawsuit, it is decided whether to retain a lawyer according to the amount and reason of the litigation claim, and I think it should be retained.

In your case, the insurance company must be a co-defendant, and if the other party does not sue the insurance company, you can appeal to the court to add it. If the other party does not agree to add, you can be exempted from liability within the scope of the insurance company's liability.

Whether to hire a lawyer or not, it is up to you to decide, if you think you can, of course, you can, but law is a specialized science, and litigation confrontation is also quite a lot of skills, so it is recommended to entrust a lawyer to deal with it.

1. On the issue of household registration, if the other party can produce evidence supported by the court, there is no particularly good way to compensate according to the urban household registration.

2. Without a work certificate, you can't claim lost time pay.

3. There is no big problem with the disability time, and the appraisal time is three to six months from the date of the accident.

4. The insurance company is a co-defendant.

Whether or not to sue the insurance company is a matter for the plaintiff to decide, and in the future, you can directly claim compensation from the insurance company with the judgment and the insurance policy.

If the other party is really arrogant, you can only ask a lawyer to come forward and say that you are fully responsible, because you want the insurance company to pay the money, and if you don't change the record, the other party is also responsible, then it is not good to ask for money. It's best to find witnesses quickly, and if a lawyer is present to testify, then your question is very small, I'm not professional, and the answer is at this level.

Spend some money and secretly ask someone to beat them up before you get angry.

The responsibility for the accident lies with both parties at the time of the accident. This is not directly related to the owner of the car. Unless the parties are unable to compensate for the accident, the car owner will be jointly and severally liable.

Tangled questions This is obviously vexatious I think you should find a lawyer to sue.

If you don't run, you are completely irresponsible, and if you don't run, the problem is complicated, at least secondary.

If this is the case, your friend is not responsible.

Your friend is not responsible, but you have to find evidence.

According to your description, your friend should not be responsible, and it would be more beneficial for your friend if there was surveillance footage on the road. I hope your friend can go to the traffic police department, at least the traffic police should identify the scratches on the bumper of the car.

1. Judging from the situation you introduced, your friend is not responsible for this accident, and for your friend, it can only be counted as an accident.

2. But your friend should call the police immediately and make a correct accident determination. Because, if the later forensic examination can not accurately reflect the true cause of the death of the pedestrian. Therefore, this move may not be conducive to the correct handling of the matter, unless there is other evidence to prove the true situation at that time.

Lawyer Liu Dalai in Beijing.

Whatever is the responsibility for this matter, the person who hit him is responsible for what are you afraid of.

Your friend's responsibility lies in whether the deceased was dead or alive before hitting your friend's bumper.

If there is a surveillance video and eyewitnesses, it is recommended that your friend quickly surrender himself, otherwise according to the hit-and-run theory, no responsibility will become responsibility.

Of course, according to the situation you described, your friend's car was only a secondary impact, and the responsibility was secondary.

The behavior of the landlord's friend is a traffic hit-and-run, Article 92 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law

If a party escapes after a traffic accident, the party who escaped bears full responsibility. However, if there is evidence to prove that the other party is also at fault, the liability may be mitigated."

If everything the landlord said is true, and the landlord's friend can provide evidence to prove what the landlord said, it depends on the autopsy results.

If the autopsy results prove that the cause of death was caused by a collision with the landlord's friend's vehicle, then the landlord's friend may be 50% responsible;

If you can't provide evidence, the landlord's friend will be 100% responsible.

If you are 100% responsible, the problem is more serious.

If the autopsy results prove that the cause of death of the deceased was caused by a collision with your friend's car, the landlord will not only have to pay compensation, but also be sentenced.

There is no trace of what the landlord said, but the naked eye of the landlord and the landlord's friends.

It is highly likely that there were eyewitnesses at the time of the accident, and there were probably surveillance cameras at the scene of the accident. It is strongly recommended that the landlord's friend turn himself in and explain the situation at that time.

The motorbike driver is unlicensed, the motorcycle is licensed, and the driver is drunk driving.

Trucks are speeding. Both sides occupy the road. Is it at the time of the accident that they are on the left and right lane separation lines?

The traffic police shall issue a "Traffic Accident Identification Certificate", in which the responsibility of both parties will be determined.

According to Article 76, Paragraph 1 of the Traffic Safety Management Law, when a motor vehicle is involved in a traffic accident, the party at fault shall be liable for compensation. If both parties are at fault, they shall be liable for compensation according to their respective faults.

Since both parties occupy the road at the time of the accident, drunk driving on a motorcycle and speeding on a truck may each pay 50% of the responsibility.

The "Traffic Accident Identification" shall prevail and the traffic police appraisal conclusion shall prevail.

The main cause of accidents is occupying the road, that is, when you meet the car, you don't go your own way, right? Then, the party that encroaches on the right of way is more responsible; Then we need to look at other illegal behaviors that affect safe driving. For example, drunk driving and speeding are the direct causes of accidents.