How does the invention of a superparticle accelerator simulate escaping from a black hole?

Particles are accelerated as they get close to the black hole, and the gravitational pull of the black hole causes the particles to fall in excess of the speed of light. There may be crazy energy from black holes going out of the black hole world**.

It is to accelerate the particle to about 90% of the speed of light, and quickly collide with the antiparticle and then it can be successful.

The invention of the super particle accelerator is a series of high-tech methods to simulate the escape from the black hole, reflecting the continuous development of China's scientific and technological level.

Theoretically, yes. The reason is that a nuclear fusion reaction occurs after the particles collide. Releases a lot of energy.

But because the newly formed particles are smaller than the original ones. This makes it easy to collapse. Thus absorbing the surrounding substances.

So that it can theoretically be formed. But now it can't be. At least for now, the energy technology on this planet can't hit that field.

American physics professor has created a miniature black hole According to the British "Guardian" on March 18**, a physics professor at Brown University in the United States, Horati Nastasi, recently created an artificial black hole on the earth through experiments. Although this black hole is small, it has many of the characteristics of a real black hole. We might think that "black holes are black" on the face of it.

However, the black holes made by Nastasi are somewhat like those made by Doctor Octopus, they are both bright fireballs.

Nastasi said that the relative heavy ion collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory can collide the nucleons of large atoms (such as gold nucleons) with each other at nearly the speed of light, producing heat energy equivalent to 300 million times the temperature of the sun's surface. Nastasi's searing fireball, which he created at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York using the principle of atomic impact, happens to have the remarkable properties of celestial black holes. For example:

A fireball can absorb 10 times its own mass of particles around it, which is more than all current quantitative physics has predicted that a fireball can absorb. In fact, the idea of artificial black holes was first proposed in the 80s of the 20th century, by Professor William Anlu of the University of British Columbia, Canada, who believed that the behavior of sound waves in a fluid is very similar to the behavior of light in a black hole, and if the speed of the fluid exceeds the speed of sound, then in fact an artificial black hole has been established in the fluid.

From the outer edge of the black hole to the surface of the black hole, the particles are constantly accelerated, but when the particles enter the inside of the black hole, how to accelerate, if there is still a huge gravitational force inside the black hole, then the surface of the black hole will not be attracted by the huge gravitational force inside the black hole and collapse? If so, wouldn't black holes form fixed-mass objects that are constantly devouring themselves?

The above are all my thoughts, hehe, immature, the landlord laughs, but I think in its interior, particles should still follow Newton's three laws in classical mechanics, classical mechanics is also a law of certain universal significance, so it will not be outdated when studying the movement of celestial bodies, but when determining mechanics, the corresponding coordinate system should be selected according to the corresponding gravitational change and space change, not that the gravitational field change coordinate system cannot be determined, but each gravitational space state will have a coordinate system, but in the final analysis, The physical process must be continuous and uninterrupted, and there is no out-of-context statement, but each moment is not only a change in various forces, but a change in the coordinate system, space, and even time of the entire judgment.

I'm sorry for digressing, but then again, the landlord said that this question must be constantly accelerated on the surface, constantly stretched, and the particles continue to decompose, which is the view of the infinite divisibility of matter, but the question is what order of magnitude can matter be separated in the end, of course, the current science cannot answer.

There is also a saying that it is constantly stretched, constantly decomposed, until it is decomposed into elementary particles, which is the view of elementary particle theory, but what kind of particles are the most basic and primitive particles, how much is the mass, charged or not, and whether they participate in physical changes, of course, these current science cannot answer.

Theory pushes us to progress, and experimenting to seek true knowledge and constantly revise our theory is the process of progress. It's too off-topic from what the landlord wants to know.,Hehe.,Just see the landlord's question and feel it.,I hope it will help the landlord.。

The subject is the idea generated by watching "The Three-Body Problem", right? It depends on what the space probe needs to do, and it is analyzed at the current state of the art: (in protons).

The program that implements probes, if expressed in binary, is let's say 1000 binary bits. If the spin of a proton represents the two states 0 and 1, then the program needs at least 1000 protons.

The lens or antenna of the detector, to ensure that the detector is usable, then the lens and antenna must have a sufficient size, which may be noted as x, assuming that only two protons at a distance of x are used.

However, considering the uncertainty limit of quantum mechanics, if the corresponding function is to be achieved with the above-mentioned small number of protons, then the protons must be arranged according to the specified position and remain precise, so its momentum is difficult to determine. Therefore, in order for the quantum mechanical effect not to disintegrate the detector, it is also necessary to configure enough particles to counteract the "uncertainty limit" (i.e., to make the particle swarm reach the macroscopic standard, and to submerge the microscopic quantum mechanical monster in the bottom of the statistical mechanics).

To sum up, even if the carrier is protons, the detector body needs a large number of protons to complete. So there are only two ways to build a particle-sized detector: the first is to discover more "basic" particles that are much smaller than the particles, so that they contain more information; The second is the high dimension in "The Three-Body Problem" (if the current string theory is correct, the path of high dimension is also difficult to get through).

Then you have to break down the detector into particles, but how to restore it to the detector.

Can't be sure, you can do your own research.