Is it reasonable for the community to block his home for 7 days when a man went home with a green

A man ** a paragraph about the community quarantine incident, the man claimed to be holding a green code, fromLow-risk areasReturning to their hometowns, according to national policies, they should be able to go home directly, but the corresponding communities are afraid of the risk of infection, so they are forced to quarantine for seven days, which is unreasonable because it is contrary to the relevant national policies and regulations, and their own decisions cannot conflict with the relevant national regulations.

1. Epidemic prevention and control.

For us now, epidemic prevention and control is a very important event, because an epidemic has swept in, and too many of our friends, relatives, and people have left us. We have been strictly preventing and controlling the epidemic and trying to fight it, and we hope that the epidemic will be completely defeated by us and that more and more people will not be infected. This is a very strict and protracted battle, not only do we have to fight the epidemic, but we also have to pay attention to the development of our country's economy at the same time, and we must not let the epidemic hinder our way forward.

We must always protect ourselves, because only by protecting ourselves can our country and nation survive the ordeal. Start from the small things around us, wash your hands frequently every day, ventilate more, and respond to the epidemic in strict accordance with national standards, only if each of us has done a good job of self-protection, so that the epidemic will not be left to take advantage of, and we can quickly and in the best state to get through the epidemic. <>

Second, the community's approach is very unreasonable.

Because while the community's intentions are good, he is responsible for the rest of the people in each community. But we should not make superfluous choices, and for others. We should strictly follow the national response standards to deal with this epidemic prevention and control, and those who have returned from low-risk areas have a green code in their hands, and they have not been to places with a source of infection.

And during this period, it is almost impossible for them to come into contact with the case, and for isolation, the quarantined people need to provide all the expenses during the quarantine period, which is a different degree of cost expenditure for each family, and we should consider all factors, not just for ourselves, not to take responsibility, afraid of taking responsibility, and choose to ignore the vital interests of others. <>

3. Final insights.

Our country is now facing the attack of the epidemic, but we follow the unified leadership of the national leadership and the efforts of all the people, and the development of the epidemic has been contained by us within the smallest scope and limit, which shows that there is nothing that the people of our whole country cannot defeat when united, and we should cheer up and maintain a positive attitude to deal with all this! We have to believe that victory is ours. <>

Plausible. After all, now is a period of repeated epidemics, even if you have a green code, if you are from a medium and high-risk area, you should still consciously isolate at home, our safety awareness should be enhanced, and isolating at home is not only to protect yourself, but also to protect others. Only when everyone consciously quarantines and strengthens our defenses can we hope to defeat the virus as soon as possible.

Of course it doesn't make sense. Because the itinerary code is already green, there is no need to quarantine at home.

The man went home with a green code and was "closed" by the community for 7 days, and it is unreasonable for the community to do this, because it has already been written, if you come back from a low-risk area, as long as you hold a green code, you can not be quarantined.

There is a certain amount of plausibility. The community does this for the sake of the community's health and prevention. But after all, the man is holding a green code and is a little unreasonable to be locked at home for 7 days.

Plausible. During the epidemic period, it is best to treat it especially and be good to everyone.

It is clearly reasonable for the community to do so. According to the notice of the National Health Commission, those returning from low-risk areas with a negative nucleic acid test certificate do not need to be quarantined. The society estimates that it is because in Heilongjiang Province, the vigilance is high, and it is a one-size-fits-all approach to forcibly isolate people.

All localities should not increase their quarantine policies without authorization, and I hope that all localities will take warning.

It is unreasonable for the community to do this, the state requires people with a green code and a negative nucleic acid test result to be exempt from quarantine, the man not only has a green code but also a nucleic acid test certificate, and it is wrong for the community to isolate him, but it is also for safety reasons.

I think this is unreasonable, because the state stipulates that people who go home with a green code can not accept home quarantine and only need to show the green code.

In this case, there is no doubt that the neighborhood office and the community involved have adopted a "one-size-fits-all" approach, as long as they have returned from other places, they must be quarantined, regardless of whether they have returned from a risky area, and there is no scientific requirement for epidemic prevention and control, and there is no concern at all about whether the quarantined person can survive safely, making the quarantine objectively become illegal detention. Epidemic prevention and control is a scientific and rigorous work, which will be very hard and requires relevant staff to have a strong sense of responsibility, but the personnel of the departments involved are not like this, which seems to be strict, but in fact it is chaotic and irresponsible, which objectively violates relevant laws and has "all kinds of harm but no benefit" for the correct epidemic prevention and control.

Yes, because this man is returning home from a medium- and high-risk area, and although he has a green code, he should still be quarantined at home for a period of time.

I don't think it's reasonable to do this, since the state requires the local government not to increase the code layer by layer, so since it is a green code, it means that it is from a low-risk area, and as long as there is a nucleic acid test certificate, it should no longer be sealed at home.

Quarantine is definitely for everyone's good, you are from**to**. After passing through those places again, you should investigate clearly and make a decision! The epidemic situation in one place is seriously different from that in another place, so the management should be stricter