What does it mean that others are hell? Others are where hell comes from

If you don't discern who you shouldn't believe, believe in the wrong person, or the person you believe in betrays you, say what you shouldn't say, and do what you shouldn't do, it may bring about consequences like going to hell for yourself.

"The other is hell" is a line from the existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) in his play Interval, also known as Confinement. Sartre explained: "This phrase is often misunderstood.

Some people think that I mean to say that our relationships with others are always poisoned, always hellish relationships. I mean, if a person's relationship with someone else deteriorates, then that person else is hell. It is true that a significant part of the world lives in hell because he himself is too dependent on the judgment of others.

But that's not to say that there can't be another relationship with someone else.

It means that all of us live in a social relationship that is both interdependent and crushing with others. The phrase "The Other is Hell" comes from the existentialist philosopher Sartre's play "Confinement", which tells the absurd story of three undead who are suspicious of each other, hide from each other, guard each other, and torture each other.

This sentence seems mysterious, but it actually permeates all aspects of life.

Dr. Henry Claude, in The Power of Others, divides human relationships into four types:

First, isolated, unconnected.

Second, bad, negative connections.

Third, connections that appear to be beautiful but are actually hypocritical.

Fourth, real, beneficial connections.

With the exception of the first type of complete isolation, most of the time our relationships with others are between two and three, that is, uncomfortable but unacceptable social relationships.

In 1965, when Sartre made a recording for Confinement, he gave a comprehensive explanation of "the other is hell". His interpretation contains the following implications: if your relationship with others is distorted and deteriorated, then they can only be hell; If you live your life the way others think you are, then others are also your hell.

He added that the other is important, that the self can only know itself through others, and even that the feeling of recognition is only gained through a Hegelian "master-slave struggle" with others. Sartre wanted to warn that if the relationship between the self and others deteriorates, and the self becomes too attached to the evaluation of others, it will lead to "the other being hell".

In terms of the influence of the family on childhood, the influence of the "other" (family) is important, the "other" is more important than the self, and the other determines the self; However, in terms of the lifelong impact of childhood on the individual, the self is more important than others, and the person's sense of self (childhood) determines the person's life. When a person reaches middle age, he has to face others in society and has to accept the discipline of "socialization", but no matter how strong others in society are, the individual still only listens to the self-consciousness that he has formed in childhood.

Heidegger.

Heidegger proposed that the relationship between man and the world is not first of all to understand the world and transform the world, but to "exist in the world", that is, man is first and foremost a being in the world. So, what kind of being is man? Heidegger said that man exists alone; Heidegger specifically uses the phrase "fear of death" to illustrate:

When we are afraid of death, we will deeply realize that our existence is our own business, and no one can replace us. In this sense, everyone is "free". From here, Sartre goes on to say that how man exists should be the result of man's own choice, that is, man first exists above the world, and then man is free to choose his own behavior, and man's behavior determines man's essence, so Sartre said that "existence precedes essence".

In this way, the essence of human beings is the result of free choice, or should be the result of free choice. But Sartre believes that we are often involuntary in reality, and this obstacle is the gaze of "others". The gaze of "others" is terrifying, and it unscrupulously interferes with my choices, making me hesitate to choose, and even forced to make choices that I don't want (I think you should feel the same way if you connect with life experience).

The hero of Sartre's play "Interval" is in such a situation, so he sighs at the end of the play: "Others are hell!" ”

When we always divide everything into "me" and "him", over time, we will put ourselves and the world around us against each other, and this opposition makes people unable to trust each other, cannot care for each other, cannot tolerate each other, and become attacking each other, cursing each other, hurting each other, and it is constructing hell.

In layman's terms, you live for others.

1. Others are hell means not to trust others too much, it is better to believe in anyone than to believe in yourself, if you do not distinguish the person you should not believe, believe in the wrong person, or the person you believe in betrayed yourself, say what you shouldn't say, do what you shouldn't do, it may bring about the consequences like going to hell yourself.

2. The French existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre wrote in his famous play "Confinement": "The other is hell." This sentence vividly describes the inevitable contradictions and conflicts between people.

We spontaneously develop prejudices against others in our interpersonal interactions, which can sometimes lead to aggressive behaviors with different purposes and even lead to conflicts between the two parties. In the wider human society, conflict exists not only between people, but also between different groups such as race, gender, and even nations.

Others are Hell" from "Confinement" by the French writer Jean-Paul Sartre.

Others are hell" understood:

If a person's relationship with another person deteriorates and gets worse, then the other person is a hell ......It is true that there are quite a few people in the world who live in hell because they rely too much on the judgment of others. But that's not to say that there can't be another relationship with someone else. It is extremely important to change your behavior.

Man is always in a mutual relationship with others, and his freedom must also be realized in his relationship with others. Man itself is just a concept relative to others, without others, people will no longer be human beings, so people need others and cannot do without others.

In the mutual relationship with others, if you choose everything in order to realize your own selfish and despicable desires, or even by unscrupulous means, sacrifice the freedom of others to achieve your own desires, you will push others into hell, and other people's lives are all projections in life, and those who harm others will harm themselves!

Whoever knows "hell" starts with a selfish choice, and then "suffers the fish in the pond", and the result can only be that everyone lives in the hell of "no one can get better", and wants to harm others and rectify people, and the final result is inevitably to harm oneself and rectify oneself, lifting a stone to shoot oneself in the foot. In other words, if you are the cause of the deterioration of your relationship with others, you will have to bear the pain of hell.

The choice of a narrow and selfish mind can become one's own hell, while the choice of a cheerful and expansive mind can become a paradise for others, and there is only one layer of separation between heaven and hell - depending on how sentient beings choose.