I Am Not the God of Medicine was fined 20,000 yuan for infringement, where is this drama infringin

Friends who often know social news should have learned such a piece of information, the producer of the movie "I Am Not the God of Medicine" was sentenced to a fine of 20,000 yuan by the court for infringement, and many people have a deep impression of the movie "I Am Not the God of Medicine", so what is the infringement of this movie? Let's introduce it like this. <>

It is understood that the film "I Am Not the God of Medicine" is suspected of infringement of a **, this ** is a piece of some buildings in New Delhi, India, taken by the plaintiff Zhang, and "I am not the God of Medicine" was used without Zhang's consent during the filming process, so it is suspected of infringement, the production of the film is a very complex process, which not only has the performance of the actors, the director's guidance, but also has a variety of **information, so at this time for all kinds of ** The information fragment party must pay attention to obtaining the consent of the original author, otherwise it is very likely to be suspected of infringement, although the movie "I Am Not the God of Medicine" is a very good and successful movie, but the alleged infringement has become a small flaw. <>

The court imposed a fine of 20,000 yuan for the infringement of "I Am Not the God of Medicine", which is also the country's respect for intellectual property rights, and the producer paid the fine. The film is, to a certain extent, a complete success, because it is not only an excellent work of art, but also a symbol of the preservation of intellectual property. As we all know, the maintenance of intellectual property rights is an indispensable part of social development, it is precisely because of the existence of intellectual property rights, so it will stimulate the enthusiasm of many people in the society for innovation, with the innovation of the society and all walks of life will have development, after this infringement incident, I believe that the film industry is also a wake-up call, I believe they will also greatly respect intellectual property rights in the future shooting.

For this infringement incident, it shows the dignity of China's law and the importance of intellectual property rights, only a society that respects intellectual property rights can carry forward the spirit of innovation, and promote social progress and the development of modern society.

There is a scene in the film that was shot by someone else during a travel, and the work was not authorized by the original author, and it occupies more than one-sixth of the frame.

I Am Not the God of Medicine" is a very successful film and television work, but it is suspected of infringement in the clips of the film and television, and other film and television dramas, so it is necessary to bear the corresponding compensation.

Recently, the court sentenced the film party to compensate the plaintiff for economic losses of 20,000 yuan based on the facts, in view of the wide range of dissemination of the film, which has a very great impact on the parties, and according to the defendant's subjective fault.

The cause of this incident is that the movie "I Am Not the God of Medicine" used a ** privately, the content of this ** is a building in the Indian city of New Delhi, the author of ** Zhang posted this group ** on a social **platform, and the watermark was on the sea, and the accompanying text also indicated that this was filmed when he was playing in India, and the statement was original content, but the film "I am not the God of Medicine" used it privately. The original author of **Zhang, saw that what he shot was used privately when the movie was released, and the shot that appeared was two seconds, accounting for one-sixth of the movie screen, and the original author of ** believed that the film party "I am not the God of Medicine" used his original ** privately, and asked the film party "I am not the God of Medicine" to immediately stop the infringement, publish an apology, and also put forward a request for economic compensation of 480,000 yuan to the film party.

After the court accepted the case, based on the facts, it determined the fact of infringement by the film party, and from the negatives provided by the plaintiff and the evidence published on the social ** platform, it was believed that the plaintiff had a copyright to his original **, and combined with the contribution rate of this ** to the entire film, a judgment was made on this case, requiring the film party to stop the infringement and requiring the film party to compensate the plaintiff Zhang with an amount of 20,000 yuan.

It can be seen from the beginning and end of this matter that the current domestic film and television creation environment does not respect originality, and there is no communication before using other people's original works.

There was a blogger who cut a small clip of this movie. Then he explained, saying that this was an infringement, which was discovered by the film official, and finally asked him to compensate for the loss.

This film uses a ** at the beginning of the film, this ** is someone else's original work, and then the other party sues.

There will inevitably be similarities in the works, which directly triggered the fuse and made people suspect plagiarism.

It seems that there is a scene in this movie that uses other people's photography, but without the consent of the original author.

I am not the god of medicine, when I was shooting, there was a camera that shook a painting for two seconds, and I was sued for infringement and compensated 20,000 yuan for public apology, which proves that the awareness of copyright protection is indeed becoming more and more strict. But whether this kind of copyright protection is reasonable or not, it's really hard to say, because the protection is particularly strict, then there will be some misjudgments, but if it is not protected, it is indeed someone's copyright, which is not good. <>

To protect the copyright of the creator, try to determine a standard, under what circumstances should it be regarded as infringement, it turned out to be a commercial purpose, and his current concept of commercial purpose is too vague. It's like when I'm not shooting in the god of medicine, the camera just flickers over this sentence, is this a commercial purpose? In a broad sense, it counts, but strictly speaking, it doesn't count, because everyone sees that I am not in the God of Medicine, I am going to the plot, not for this painting.

This painting is not the reason why I am not the god of medicine, and the attendance rate is relatively high and relatively successful, and it is even said that he can't even take care of a factor. <>

Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the scope of a commercial concept, and to be strict, what do you think is the strict commercial significance, that is, others have made money with this copyright, and it is because of the copyrighted product that they have made money, which is to a large extent, at least 75%, and others are willing to pay for this work, and are willing to give this person a reward for singing, because the song he sings is particularly liked by the audience, not for other things. If to a large extent, people's income is not because of this work, but only a little bit, then this cannot be regarded as infringement, because the money they make is not because of this work, but because of their own person. <>

It is estimated that after this incident came out, the film manufacturer would also consider the copyright issue more carefully when filming that work, because a small shot clip was not noticed, and he was forced to apologize publicly and have to lose money, which is not appropriate. When editing, cut down the two-second shot and switch it to another way, can this work be incomplete without this shot? Of course not, so as long as you pay attention to this problem in the future, he generally won't have anything like that again.

<>"I Am Not the God of Medicine" was fined 20,000 yuan for infringement, what did it tell us inside and outside the play?

This movie has recently been on the hot search, and the reason why it is on the hot search is mainly because of the copyright problem. The film used an Indian ** shot by the plaintiff Zhang without permission, and the judgment showed that the defendant needed to stop the alleged infringement, and also compensated the plaintiff for the loss of 20,000 yuan, and apologized. Then the play and the play tell us a truth, no matter when you infringe on the rights and interests of others, otherwise you will be sued in court and will be asked by the plaintiff for compensation.

This movie was taken to court for infringement, so what does this tell us?

This film is indeed a good movie, although there are no big scenes and exquisite special effects, but it perfectly interprets the real society. So after this film came out, it has been attracting a lot of attention and has also received a high box office. But after the infringement, many people have a different understanding of this movie.

It is understood that the ** filmed by the plaintiff only appears for two seconds in the film, and it only occupies about 1 6 of the screen. Some netizens said that there is no need to go online like this, but good movies and copyright issues are two different issues, and the two cannot be compared. A film is indeed a good film, but the infringement is also a fact, so the producer and director of this film need to have the courage to admit mistakes and correct them!

This film was fined 20,000 yuan for infringement, what do you know?

No matter when, we have no reason to illegally encroach on other people's privacy, if you have committed any infringement, then you need to pay the corresponding compensation, this film finally stopped the infringement, and compensated the plaintiff 20,000 yuan to apologize, from these things we also understand the importance of privacy, if your rights and interests are violated, then you also need to take up the law in time to protect your rights and interests!

The play tells us a truth, not necessarily all people who break the law and commit crimes are bad people, there are still feelings outside the law, but the play tells us that the law is the law, even if this movie is good, but it can't be illegal.

Both in and out of the play, we are told that we must abide by the law and be a good citizen who abides by the law, so that we can have a normal life.

No matter what you do, don't infringe, don't violate the law, and don't have a fluke mentality.

"I Am Not the God of Medicine" was fined 20,000 yuan for infringement, and the reason why such incidents often occur is that the public's awareness of copyright is not strong enough, and they always have a luck mentality. The infringement of this movie this time is a**, this ** was taken by a netizen when he went on a trip**, and did not give the program team any right to use it. However, the program team directly pasted this ** on the background wall without the consent of the other party, and ** also appeared in the picture of the movie, so it caused the problem of infringement.

It may seem like a very small thing, but the phenomenon reflected in it is really serious. Because film crews should pay attention to copyright issues, and this kind of staff should be more aware of copyright than the public. But what is unacceptable is that the staff in the film crew did not realize the seriousness of the infringement, and no one noticed whether the ** on the wall was infringing in the entire later stage.

In fact, the success of every work is inseparable from the details, and the specific details should include all aspects. <>

I Am Not the God of Medicine" did get very good results when it was released, but this does not mean that every scene in the movie is worth scrutinizing. So I think that the problem this time is really on the crew, and if the staff can have more confidence and responsibility, it will not cause such a situation. Not only did this crew infringe, but other film and television crews also had many similar problems.

For example, someone sued the crew for directly using the family's wedding photos in the picture, and some crews directly put the network pictures on the Internet in the work. These all infringed on the relevant rights and interests of others, so in the end, the crew also paid the corresponding price for this. Whether it is a film or television drama or ** or **, there is a copyright, so I hope that people from all walks of life will pay attention to copyright in the future.

The relevant authorities should also promote the awareness of copyright and not let copyright be lost.

Because the filmmakers are not rigorous in doing things, and they do not review the content of the film in a timely manner, coupled with the lack of legal awareness, it happens repeatedly.

The main reason why this happens to me is that many film and television dramas nowadays will use some ** or film and television works when filming, and these film and television works are not done with others, and it is very easy to cause the Qingquan phenomenon to occur when the communication is good, and the relevant departments should strengthen the prevention, control and management in this regard to ensure the safety of the original author's work.

The use of the work without the permission of the plaintiff infringes upon the plaintiff's right of reproduction, the right of information network dissemination, and the right of authorship of the work in question, and shall bear legal responsibility for stopping the infringement, making a formal apology, and compensating for economic losses.

Without permission, he used the New Delhi building ** in India, filmed by the plaintiff Zhang, in the movie "I Am Not the God of Medicine". The alleged infringing photographic work appeared, and the plaintiff was sued for infringement.

According to the judgment, the defendant stopped the infringement involved in the case, compensated the plaintiff Zhang for economic losses of 20,000 yuan and apologized.

Plagiarism and misappropriation are illegal, even if the work is likable and the starring and director are famous, the law will not allow the illegal acts to go unpunished. <>

Creation has always been a sacred word, it represents the infinite wisdom of human beings, but it is difficult to create, after all, everyone's inspiration is limited, can not have fresh ideas at every moment, so now many creators will plagiarize other people's existing works, this behavior has seriously infringed on other people's copyright and intellectual property rights, is not allowed by the law, so everyone should keep in mind this legal principle, whenever there is an idea of plagiarizing other people's works, kill it in time, otherwise you will be ruined. <>

But there are always some people who will not hesitate to violate the bottom line of the law for the sake of profit, the most blatant of which is entertainment workers, many directors and screenwriters in the entertainment industry, etc., they think that they are public figures, so they can be above the law, so they do not shy away from plagiarizing other people's works, "I Am Not the God of Medicine" is a wake-up call for these behaviors and ideas, no matter how famous you are in the entertainment industry, or the people of the whole country have seen your movies, these will not work, Breaking the law is never a slogan, and you will never be punished for it, even if your plagiarized work is popular, once it is found, it is an illegal work! <>

As a citizen of the People's Republic of China, we must actively respond to the country's policy of governing the country according to law, and resolutely not do things such as plagiarism and plagiarism, which is not only a kind of respect for the law, but also a maintenance of one's own moral code.