U.S. antitrust is still Apple and Google this time, why is global antitrust keeping an eye on tech g

In fact, the whole world is fighting monopoly, and it also wants to stop those monopolistic behaviors. And many times we all know that monopolistic behavior has a relatively large negative impact.

The United States is also constantly carrying out anti-monopoly, and there are also some targets, and many companies are targeted by some authorities in the United States, and they may also be punished. The U.S. antitrust is still Apple and Google this time, what is the global antitrust"Keep an eye on it"Tech giants? I think there are three main reasons:

First, the market position of the tech giants is higher.

In fact, in my opinion, I think the reason why global antitrust is focusing on tech giants is because the market position of tech giants is very high. A lot of times the tech giants are able to give themselves more market share, and they are also able to allow themselves to occupy more share. This means that many tech giants are able to make themselves have a higher market position, and they can also make themselves more competitive, so it is easier to produce monopolistic behavior, so they should keep an eye on those tech giants.

Second, tech giants are more capable of monopolizing the market.

Of course, in my opinion, I think the reason why we need to keep an eye on those tech giants is because those tech giants are more powerful, and they can also allow themselves to have more capital, they can give themselves more ability to monopolize, and they can also engage in more unfair competition, so we need to keep an eye on them. <>

Third, tech giants are more likely to abuse their dominant market position.

Of course, it has to be said that it is precisely because many technology giants can make themselves have a higher market position, and they can also allow themselves to have more market share, they are more likely to abuse their dominant market position, they have no consciousness, and they also want to get more benefits for themselves through more unfair competition behaviors, which will lead to more and more monopolistic behaviors, so keep an eye on them. <>

That's my opinion.

Because for technology, it is very difficult to produce a product, and once a company monopolizes, how can it face the phenomenon of long-term harvesting by this enterprise, so the world has to keep an eye on the monopoly of technology giants.

Because these technology giants have been monopolizing the relevant standards of the industry and holding the right to speak by virtue of their own status, affecting the normal development of other companies in the industry.

Because only these giants are qualified to monopolize, the monopoly of small factories cannot have a long-term impact. So the global antitrust will always be"Keep an eye on it"These tech giants.

Because the tech giants have more powerful technology, if they want to monopolize a certain market, it is a very easy thing for them, so the global antitrust has to focus on the tech giants.

In fact, because of the monopoly, they will actually suffer a certain economic impact, and many times their financial system will collapse, so they must keep an eye on it.

The U.S. Department of Justice intends to launch an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, and Apple may have monopolistic behavior, as can be seen from its current market position and restrictions on application providers.

1. The U.S. Department of Justice intends to initiate an antitrust lawsuit against Apple<> Inc

According to the latest international news, the U.S. Department of Justice is currently preparing to launch an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, according to the U.S. Department of Justice's determination, they believe that Apple abuses its market position, but also stifles the competition and production of small technology companies, and more importantly, restricts application providers and hardware manufacturers, which has seriously restricted the competition of local technology companies, and in fact infringes on the rights and interests of consumers.

Second, Apple may indeed have a <> of monopolistic behavior

Judging from Apple's market position and corresponding behavior, Apple may indeed have monopolistic behavior. At present, Apple is a leading enterprise in the technology industry in the world, and Apple's revenue and profits are quite exaggerated. In addition, Apple has been sued in South America for restricting the non-delivery of charging heads to consumers, which means that this kind of infringement of consumer rights and interests may also involve monopolistic behavior, and the anti-monopoly law is originally to place certain behaviors that infringe on the interests of consumers and restrict competition, and Apple does have corresponding flaws at present.

3. Whether there is monopolistic behavior in the end depends on the determination <> the U.S. ** Trading Commission

According to the current progress of criminal compliance in the United States, whether Apple has monopolistic behavior and whether it constitutes a crime depends on how the United States ** trade fair will determine. Even if the U.S. Department of Justice has wanted to file an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, but under the mediation of the U.S. ** Exchange Commission, Apple is very likely to reach a settlement agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, and eventually monopolistic behavior has become a questionable fact, and we should be cautious about this.

It should exist, after all, Apple's software is suspected of monopoly, and there will be a lot of profit on it.

At present, a lawsuit has been initiated, and the lawsuit is being processed, so this behavior will occur.

I have a feeling that there will still be monopolistic behavior, and according to sources, the various groups of prosecutors within the program are potentially preparing for the proceedings.

Apple has earned more than 110 billion in three months, and Apple's influence in all walks of life is already very largeApple is not just making mobile phones, and Apple's mobile phone product line is enough to be compared with the four major domestic manufacturers. <>

Apple has reached the level of monopoly in all walks of life, this can not be said, because there are some industries Apple's influence is really great, for example, the influence of mobile phones and iPhones in the world is very large, especially in the Americas, in Europe, in our place, the original influence is also very large, but then the four major domestic shopping malls gradually rose, although the performance is not so good, but it is cheap, so Apple's market share is not so high, but you can't deny it,In terms of internationalization, Apple has done much better than domestic manufacturers, and it has occupied the international market earlier and stepped out earlier.

Apple's system has reached the level of monopoly, that is, if you want to use Apple's huge user base for any software, then you must go through Apple's app store, otherwise you have no way to run it on Apple's mobile phone, because Apple's system is a closed system, and the producer of the game Fortnite also sued Apple for abuse of market dominance because of this matter a while ago, but obviously Apple's legal team does not admit this and claims that we are originally a closed-source systemWe can't become an Android system, and it is impossible to have a situation where we can bypass the app store on its own.

And Apple's profit margin is relatively high, the gross profit margin requirements of Apple's various product lines are above 40%, and the product line that does not reach the gross profit margin of 40% is either reformed or cut, and Apple's brand premium is 10 points high, a normal mobile phone, even if the domestic manufacturers have piled up all kinds of configurations to the peak, the peak of the existing technology, she sells to 5000 6000 It's almost the same, you think it's not worth it no matter how high it is, But Apple sells a flagship phone for 10,000 yuanYou think it's normal, the premium of that brand comes out all of a sudden, and the profit margin is naturally high.

Yes, because there are some software that can only be used on Apple phones. And there are also a lot of features that ordinary mobile phones can't use.

Yes, many electronic network products are now developed and manufactured by Apple, and there are many companies they are involved in.

Personally, I think Apple should be regarded as an industry monopoly, after all, I think Apple is relatively domineering in many fields, and it can be regarded as a monopoly.

It's a monopoly, and this kind of behavior is enough to see what Apple wants to do, but it's really unclear and unethical.

Among the mobile operating systems, Google's Android is probably the most popular with its market share.

Much higher than Apple's iOS, despite the success of the Android system, behind it, there are a lot of hidden problems and hidden dangers, which has also brought a lot of trouble to Google. With the world's largest operating system, Google faces antitrust scrutiny in many places. The EU is probably the worst violator.

Google has lost its appeal. However, despite the verdict upheld, Google was not entirely in vain. According to the previous ruling, Google must pay a fine of up to 100 million euros (about 30 billion yuan).

The amount of the fine was reduced to 100 million euros, or about 28.6 billion yuan. Google, one of the world's largest tech companies, is unlikely to be affected by fines of less than $30 billion. Google's Android is the world's largest mobile operating system, with market share, is ahead of iOS, however, this has also given Google a lot of trouble, in addition to the antitrust investigation in the United States, the European Union is targeting Google's Android monopoly investigation, and at the sharp end, a common European Court of Justice ruled that it upheld the EU's previous decision on Google's Android abuse of competitors, and Google lost the appeal again.

The dominant hail position. To better reflect the seriousness and duration of the infringement, the General Court of the European Union found it appropriate to impose a fine of 100 million euros on Google. Android brings more choice, not less, to everyone in Stove Rush and supports thousands of successful businesses in Europe and around the world.

More than a decade later, the court overturned the ruling, demanding not only a fine, but also 600 million euros in interest.

The Commission believes that Google's monopoly on the online search business, as well as the licensing restrictions on the Android mobile phone operating system and Google's exclusive app, have violated the EU's Antitrust Law. Due to Google's monopoly position in the market, other related companies have been suppressed for similar competitive product innovation and market sales based on their advantageous conditions, and the market environment for fair competition has been seriously weakened, and the interests of consumers have also been damaged.

But because the EU wants to make money from this, and Google itself is a relatively wealthy person, it will not care.

He probably didn't want to go through this again, anyway, it was a warning to them.

I think this is a very normal phenomenon, because in the U.S., Apple has a lot of throughput, and it's actually very difficult not to inhibit the growth of small tech companies, especially in terms of application developers and hardware manufacturers, and Apple in the U.S. has the potential to inhibit the competition of these small tech companies in the process of personal growth.

In fact, in any country, monopoly will adopt a suppressive attitude, especially in the United States, the United States believes in freedom of competition, and if a monopoly is found, then it will be obviously suppressed. In addition to the U.S. Department of Justice cashier's prosecution of Apple, there is also the possibility of suing Google, because the U.S. Department of Justice believes that the advertising business that is dominant by leasing Google has caused serious damage to other companies, and has gradually formed a monopoly in the process of competition, in the United States, Google occupies about 90% of the search volume in the United States, and has long used anti-competitive tactics to maintain and expand its monopoly in the field of search and search advertising.

The U.S. Department of Justice is preparing to launch an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, which is actually showing all technology giants that any company may face regulation, and the company occupies too much market atmosphere in the United States in the process of growth, and also occupies too much dominance in the world, so it is likely to be suppressed, so as to give other small technology companies room to grow. At the same time, it is necessary to strictly supervise its relevant products, and it is absolutely forbidden to sacrifice competition and ruin the interests of opponents in the form of self-preferential treatment, which deliberately puts other companies' products at a disadvantage.

The U.S. Department of Justice is preparing to file a lawsuit against Apple, which seems to me to be very normal, because Apple itself dominates the U.S. mobile phone market and technology field and chooses antitrust, which is actually giving other technology companies a little room to survive.

I think the U.S. Department of Justice is right to pay Apple to initiate an antitrust lawsuit, because Apple is too powerful to be good for the economy.