Talking about problems all day long, but never providing solutions. What is this called in the eyes

In the eyes of the boss, this is called "subordinate", many people in the workplace always like to complicate the problem, is it wrong for the employee to ask more questions? If the problem he raises is something that no one else has discovered, and solving it will help the operation of the business, then that's a great thing. As the old saying goes:

Brainstorming", maybe employees don't have the ability to solve problems, but if they have the ability to find problems, they can actually help managers find a lot of problems, and if I have a subordinate like this, I will be very happy.

First of all, it is normal to ask questions in workplace communication, and some people in the workplace may think that a subordinate who asks questions all day long is not a good subordinate. Although it seems to make some sense, it is not the case, there are many kinds of questions, and there are many kinds of people who ask questions, and it is impossible to generalize. If the subordinate only asks some innocuous questions every day, or the problem raised can be solved by himself, but he does not solve it himself, he always wants to ask the leader to help.

If it is such a subordinate, any manager is very annoying, but as far as I know, the employees who can ask questions all day long must be employees with certain abilities.

Many people in the workplace may say that this kind of subordinate only knows how to ask problems, but does not provide solutions, and the boss will definitely dislike this kind of person, but is this really the case? What is the reason for having a management layer in the corporate governance framework? Isn't it to supervise, manage, and assist employees to complete their work tasks and create value for the enterprise?

If employees can solve problems, what is the use of managers? As a manager, in addition to supervising and guiding the work of employees, he also has the obligation to answer and solve the problems raised by employees.

Managers are fortunate to have problem-solving skills, but it's normal for employees to have this ability. As a manager, if he can't even solve some of the problems raised by employees, or if the manager doesn't give any explanation, then he is not qualified. Managers may use their authority to make it difficult for their subordinates to ask questions, but this does not mean that the employees who ask questions are at fault, as for what kind of people are in the eyes of the boss, it depends on what kind of person the manager is.

In the eyes of the boss, this is called "subordinate". Because such employees are not particularly strong in problem-solving skills and only ask questions, it is difficult for such employees to be reused.

It's called waste, and now many companies have such people, and such people are very annoying.

Not able to work. They feel that such people don't have much ability and can't handle some things better.

Your boss thinks you're fishing in troubled waters, thinks you don't have any professional skills, and your boss may think you're not particularly good.

People who only mention problems all day long, but never provide solutions, the boss will definitely not be treated, after all, such people will only say that they will not do it, and those who have no practical actions will be despised by the boss and will not be valued by the other party.

From a leader's point of view, he prefers people who not only ask questions, but also solve them, and such people are the people he wants. In the face of this kind of person who just talks but does not do, it will make the leader think that this kind of person is tending to be inflammatory, which makes people very disgusted.

The boss must consider the interests of the company and hope that the company can develop better, and in the face of such employees who do not do practical things, they will not pay attention to each other. No matter how many questions are raised, but there is no solution, such a person will not get the attention of the leader, and he will not see the position of the other party, which will only make the boss think that such a person should not exist. Bosses are people who like to do things silently and can see the results, rather than people who just talk and don't know how to solve them.

Although there are all kinds of people in the workplace, the boss will be more disgusted when he sees such a person, and there are countless problems, but he does not go to solve them. Bosses like people who not only speak, but also take action, so that they will be helpful to their work and will make people better accept each other. Although the boss likes sycophants, he will not be treated well in the face of such people, and such people will not solve any problems at all.

Bosses like people who can do practical things, and such employees are more reliable and helpful to the development of the company. If you want to be taken seriously by your boss, you need to be able to take actions that are helpful to the company, rather than just paying lip service, and such a person is certainly not suitable for long-term survival.

Of course, the boss will not treat such a trembling person, because such a person will only talk about Bai Jingmin and will not take any actual actions, this kind of person is very disgusting to the boss.

Of course not. This kind of person doesn't have any strength, and he is usually very good at getting things done, this kind of person is particularly annoying, and he has no real skills.

Leaders don't like such people, because such people not only have no emotional intelligence, but also may bring more trouble to the company, so leaders don't like such unpragmatic people. In the workplace, we really need to maintain our independence, but also think hard and come up with ways to solve problems.

For many leaders, the company's employees not only need to reduce the waste of time, but also should further improve the efficiency of their work, and this kind of employees are people who are valued and recognized by the leadership. Because only in this way can we create higher benefits for the company and promote the development of the company. Will the leaders like the people in the company who only ask problems all day long and don't give solutions?

I don't think I like it, and there are three reasons why it won't:

First, such employees cannot be down-to-earth.

I think this way because most leaders don't approve of this type of employee and get bored with the questions they ask. When they only ask questions, but can't come up with specific ways to solve them, their image will plummet, and in the minds of the leaders, they will become people who can't really work for the company in a down-to-earth way, so the leaders will hate such people. <>

Second, such employees are more likely to be complacent.

Another reason I say this is that when employees only ask questions and don't solve actual problems, it means that they have confidence in themselves and want to satisfy their vanity and superiority. And such employees not only cannot be humble, but also do not get along with their colleagues, so the leader will never tolerate such a proud and complacent person. <>

Third, such employees are weak.

Not only are these employees unable to improve their own strengths, but they have also been adding unwarranted trouble to the company. As a result, many leaders not only find it difficult to accept such employees, but also directly see them as incompetent. Because they will only ask worthless and meaningless questions without thinking, and cannot gradually solve the relevant problems.

That's my opinion.

Of course, the leader of such a person will not like it, because you have no real skills, you can't solve problems for the leader, but blindly ask questions, and the leader hates such people very much.

No. Because leaders like people who ask problems and give solutions, and don't like people who only ask problems and don't give solutions.

He won't like it, because he'll take your behavior as a deliberate way to find fault.

The result is nothing more than two: continue to reflect and stop reflecting.

If your problem is necessary to be solved, you can choose to continue to report to your boss or skip the level of feedback, of course, this may cost you a certain price, depending on whether you are worth it.

If your problem doesn't need to be solved right away, you can bear with it for a while and see why your boss didn't respond. Is it that he forgets your problem, or that he deliberately doesn't solve it for you, or that he has difficulty solving it and then chooses how to deal with it.

Everyone's work style is different, and if you look at it differently, would it be better if you helped your boss prepare these things in advance (which is where he didn't think about it well) and have a standard process for product design?

This kind of work now seems to be done by private enterprises.

In private enterprises, as long as you do your job well and it is useful to the capitalists, you don't need to worry about other things! As long as the capitalist can make money quickly, if this is the case, you can tell the capitalist about the current state of the relationship between the product manager and you, and he will immediately settle it for you.

Depending on what you write, you need to learn, improve, not explain.

Good advice can be hard to swallow.