Is it important for sick people to borrow lunch boxes?

Sick people don't pay attention to borrowing lunch boxes, this is just a way to help the sick, so this one doesn't have to be returned.

Hello dear, I'm a robot, you're like this, I'm happy to answer this question for you, do you say that sick people borrow lunch boxes? I don't think there's anything to pay attention to, first of all, you have to bring your own lunch box, if you are sick, I will borrow you don't want to borrow other people's money to put the box, you can go out to eat a good meal, such as ramen or something, well, because you are sick, you still borrowed and forgot about this, I tell you, you infect others with your own virus, thank you.

Talk to the patient's family so they don't have to worry too much. Before leaving, you should also say something like wishing the patient a speedy **, it is recommended that you try to say as little as possible, and the word "too much will be lost" is not unreasonable.

It's not unlucky, it's that it shouldn't be at all.

When you go to visit a sick person, buy a new one, what if there is an infectious disease. aqui te amo。

There is generally no problem with this, because it is now a scientific era, so I don't believe in these feudal superstitions at this time, but for many people, I may be more concerned about this, so there will be such a feeling.

Of course, sometimes the patient may use his own things, and he may feel this way in his heart, and the feeling is not too good, so he is generally disgusted in his heart.

So for this problem, it's just a lunch box, not a particularly valuable thing, so in this case, you just don't want that lunch box, that is, give it to the other party, so you can't see this thing, and you won't think about it, so it may be better to do this for this.

Everyone's point of view should be different, if you have a habit of cleanliness, you will definitely not borrow it! But it's actually nothing! Just wash it with dish soap!

If you borrow it, you will not only look generous, but also enhance your relationship with each other! Shorten the distance between each other! How to say, go out and rely on friends!

You don't have to worry about it!

I have such concerns, because the things I lend to others must always be clean, and of course the things I eat must be kept clean. I'll probably wash it before lending it to him.

Of course, you have to borrow it, and your classmates have to help each other.

Borrow it, and wash it yourself again after returning it.

Just borrow it. What a big deal. I thought I could have a contagion! Today's students are really conscious.

Excuse me, you can't go out to eat with your own special bowl.

I'll lend it to him without thinking!

Borrow it decisively, buddy, borrow.

It depends on how the relationship between your roommates and you is.

Look at what kind of person this classmate is.

Do you still wonder if he has any infectious diseases?

A's responsibility is to kill willfully. There is no concurrent penalty, are you taking the bar exam this year? If yes, then you can answer.

A has the intent to kill and has the result of causing death, so A has intentionally killed people.

If not, it is still intentional homicide, and the sentence is to be convicted of intentional homicide.

He shall be punished as one offence of intentional homicide.

The combination of punishment for several crimes is only theoretical. How to write the verdict depends on the judge.

Regardless of whether he killed the wrong person or not, A has committed intentional homicide, and he will definitely be punished by serious law!

Intentional homicide.

There is no question of concurrent punishment for several crimes, it is manslaughter!

According to the provisions of the Criminal Law, the act is an intentional homicide! There are no objections!!

It should be deliberate ** and manslaughter.

In this case, A's act of killing had the consequence of C's death.

Although the object is wrong, the legal interests infringed are the same. In other words, the death of either B or C violates the right to life.

Therefore, A still constitutes the crime of intentional homicide, which is the completed form of the crime.

In the absence of legal provisions, an act may only constitute an imaginary competition, but it is impossible to form a combination of punishments for several crimes. That's for sure.