Where is the Xia Dynasty? Some say that in Egypt, some say that in the Indus River, are there expert

As we all know, China has a long history of more than 5,000 years, and there are many bizarre events in the long-term historical development, which are ubiquitous with the development of history. In order to uncover these bizarre events, many experts and historians have joined the ranks of archaeology.

For a long time, Western archaeologists have many doubts about the history of our country. Among them, they have always believed that the earliest dynasty in our country, the Xia Dynasty, no longer exists. In order to anger this paradox, Chinese archaeological experts have searched for relevant materials for many years to argue.

One of the most famous experts, Professor Sun Weidong of the University of Science and Technology of China, once proposed that the Xia Dynasty must exist, but the place of existence of the Xia Dynasty is not China, so there is no trace of the Xia Dynasty in China. The professor's astonishing remarks immediately sparked a huge controversy in the historiographical circles.

In order to prove the correctness of his remarks, expert Sun Lidong gave the following three reasons: first, the earliest record of the Xia Dynasty was in the Zhou Dynasty, and there was no record in the Shang Dynasty, and it was recorded in the historical records that the Xia Dynasty had a big river from south to north, and the only big river in the world from south to north was the Nile, so the Xia Dynasty was likely to be in ancient Egypt.

The second point: the ancient Egyptian script is hieroglyphics, and the oracle bone inscription is also hieroglyphs, and there is no phenolyphic writing elsewhere before the oracle bone inscription, so the oracle bone inscription is likely to be left behind by the Egyptians after they came to China, which immediately attracted the attention of experts around the world as soon as it was exposed.

The third point: Most of the characters on the ancient Egyptian murals are yellow** and black-haired, so it can be explained that the Egyptians at that time were yellow.

When Professor Sun Lidong pointed out these three suggestions, many authoritative experts across the country have repeatedly verified them, especially for the second reason, which makes them question even more, as the most authentic record of history, there is nothing more reliable than words. Professor Sun Lidong's argument that he used oracle bone inscriptions as hieroglyphs is not wrong, but the ancient Egyptians knew about the written records for a long time, so if it was really the ancient Egyptians who established the Shang Dynasty, they would definitely leave something that recorded the history of ancient Egypt, but this has not appeared in the oracle bone inscriptions. Therefore, the existence of the Xia Dynasty is still a major mystery in world historiography.

Ancient Egypt was definitely not the Xia Dynasty. Ancient Egypt was divided into Upper and Lower Egypt for a long time. Upper Egypt was a nomadic kingdom, and Lower Egypt was an agrarian kingdom. The Xia Dynasty was a dynasty established by the nomadic Qiang people in the Yellow River Valley through a tribal alliance. It is also an alliance between nomadic and agrarian peoples.

After the ancient Qiang people went from East Africa to the Lianghe River valley through the Red Sea, climbed the Caucasus Mountains, passed through the Amu Darya, and entered the Hexi Corridor from the Tianshan North Road, they established a tribal kingdom in the upper reaches of the Yellow River, and later established the Xia Dynasty through alliances with the tribes in the middle reaches of the Yellow River. The Classic of Mountains and Seas is an ancient geographical notebook. It records the geographical, historical and biological information of the ancient Qiang people from East Africa to Bathsheba, the Arabian Peninsula, North Africa, the Two River Basins, the Indus River Basin, the Iranian Plateau, the Kunlun Mountains, the Caucasus Mountains, the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea, the Caspian Sea, the Aral Sea, the Amu Darya, the Tianshan Mountains and the Yellow River Basin.

The characteristics of the ancient Qiang people are: black hair, high nose, and yellow**.

Faqiang, a branch of the ancient Qiang people, later established the Tubo state with the Yalong people. The characteristics of the Qiang people are: curly hair, high nose, and yellow**.

The characteristics of the ancient Qiang people were formed by East Africans after mixing with the Bathsheba Semitic peoples. Both the ancient Egyptians and the ancient Babylonians were of the yellow race. And the Bath-Sheba-Semites and the Aryans who went south made up the Caucasian Arabs.

The so-called Xia Dynasty is ancient Egypt, and there is a saying that there was a river from south to north in the territory of the Xia Dynasty, and the Nile River undoubtedly conforms to this characteristic.

But when it comes to the rivers that flow from south to north, is there a section of the Yellow River in the shape of "several" that goes from south to north? As the mother river of Chinese civilization, the Xia Dynasty was more convincing than the Nile River in the surrounding area where the Yellow River flowed from south to north?

Besides, whether ancient Egypt is China's Xia Dynasty first considered the regional issue, Egypt is located in the northeast of Africa, located in the three continents of Africa, Europe and Asia, and we have to consider whether there were large sea vessels, navigation maps, compasses, etc. more than 4,000 years ago. Is it possible to sail without a compass to the North Pole or the South Pole? Without a map, would people go on foot to Europe instead of Africa?

Ancient Egypt is the cradle of human civilization, and its time span is thousands of years, and it is much earlier than the Xia Dynasty in China, so it is not only nonsense that ancient Egypt was the Xia Dynasty. It is even more the stupid conjecture of the people of the country.

"Xia" is asia, which is the transliteration of Asia. The territory of the Xia Dynasty is the whole of Asia, and the current territory of China is part of the Xia Dynasty, but the main body is not in China, so there are no cultural relics. The Xia people are a nomadic people who migrated from the west to the east, and are of the same race as ancient Egypt.

In the process of moving eastward, there will be genetic fusion with the aborigines of various places. The Yellow Emperor is the transliteration of Hun, the Hun of the Huns. After the fall of the Xia, the descendants of the Xia people fled to the north and returned to a nomadic life.

It is said in the Historical Records that the Xiongnu are descendants of the Xia people.

No. Because China's Xia Dynasty has historical relics found in the country, ancient Egypt and the Xia Dynasty have nothing to do with each other.

Ancient Egypt was not the Xia Dynasty of China, it is just a historical legend based on the fact that the two dynasties were not in the same place.

Anything is possible, question boldly, and verify carefully.

I don't want to admit it, but it's true, and it doesn't matter.

Could it be that Shang Tang went to Egypt and destroyed the Xia Dynasty? Fart.

The Xia Dynasty is not recognized by the Western historical circles because there is no archaeological evidence, but the Chinese believe that the Xia Dynasty is subordinate, and we have no way of knowing the specific appearance of the Xia Dynasty, which can only be imagined through the records in the history books.

A professor at the University of Science and Technology of China did a special study and proposed that the Xia Dynasty did not exist in China itself, but in ancient Egypt, which I do not agree with. I didn't read this professor's ** originally, and I can't refute it one by one, as far as the professor's point of view expounded on the Internet, the professor's ** obviously has loopholes, and this kind of loophole can be detected even if a non-professional sees it, why does this professor want to rely on the Xia Dynasty to ancient Egypt? Do you want to extend Chinese civilization by 1,000 years?

How is this so similar to what South Korea thinks? Do we really want to rely on this way to brush up on our sense of existence? Joke!

Of course, if there is conclusive evidence that the Xia Dynasty was in Egypt, then the Xia Dynasty would not belong to China, just as the Tang Dynasty did not belong to Japan, although the Japanese inherited a lot of things from the Tang Dynasty!

Some people think that if Egyptians had come to China at that time, there would have been evidence at the genetic level, and I think this is more reliable, and genetic census is needed to verify it.

Why did the Xia Dynasty leave no traces, maybe the Xia Dynasty was equivalent to a large village at that time, and there was no mature writing, and the emperor's funeral goods were also very simple, and they could not leave traces in the long river of time, or maybe this trace was in a corner we don't know. All in all, no matter where our civilization originated, after all, we have created a unique civilization, and there is no need to be too concerned or excited about that professor's opinion, it is just an opinion.

Traditionally, the world is divided into the middle and west according to the power of the dragon and the unicorn phoenix, the middle emperor mountain Nuwa, the west queen mother, and the east emperor Taiyi (golden crow). Huaxia is the descendant of the dragon, the territory is in Middle-earth, and Egypt is the traditional west, and in terms of geography, they have nothing to do with each other. ...Before the Great Flood was a pure mythological era, and before the gods were a semi-mythological age.

Mythologically speaking, Huaxia and ancient Egypt still have some relationship, of course, it is only a mythological relationship, such as the platform of the emperors, for example, the Chinese ancestor level in the Chinese era (5,000 to 4100) is regarded as the leader of the entire human race, for example, the Xia Shang Emperor is the nominal human emperor level of the human race. In terms of the social relations of the human race, ancient Egypt had nothing to do with China, let alone the Xia Dynasty. ......In the great flood, only Xia Boyu's fiefdom Xia survived in Middle Earth, and this land was spared because of the geographical advantages of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

After the water receded, the vast area of the Central Plains of Asia was left to develop into the Xia Dynasty, and it was impossible to migrate across continents to Africa to develop Egypt.

No, there is no relationship between the two, but there is a claim on the Internet that ancient Egypt is the Xia Dynasty of China, but there is no evidence at all, and there is no such confirmation, so there is no relationship.

Now only speculation cannot be confirmed; There are now two theories on the Internet, one is that the Sumerian civilization is the Xia Dynasty of China, and the other is that ancient Egypt is the Xia Dynasty of China, which has no specific historical basis.

No. At that time, the Xia Dynasty was only a myth recorded in history, and there was no archaeological basis, and no ruins and cultural relics related to the Xia Dynasty had been found in China, so the existence of the Xia Dynasty could not be confirmed.

At that time there were no nations ... Although people of all ethnic groups have been passed down by word of mouth, they have been passed on by written records or legends, and have become the material for human investigation and discussion in today's society! Today's DNA technology has long been able to clear the relationship between ancient humans and modern humans, so I'm afraid that I need to use facts to understand the truth that needs to be expressed.

Ancient Egypt, ancient India, ancient Babylon, including the Sumerian civilization, the Harajan civilization, and the Indian civilization, are all branches of ancient China! East Asia is the birthplace of world civilization! Ancient China was the birthplace of East Asian civilization!