What are the statutory circumstances under which criminal liability may not be pursued? Give an exam

Updated on society 2024-07-24
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    The circumstances under which criminal liability is not pursued by law are as follows:

    1. The circumstances are obviously minor and the harm is not great, and it is not considered a crime.

    2. The statute of limitations for prosecution has expired.

    3. Those who have been exempted from punishment by amnesty order.

    4. Crimes that are handled only after being complained in accordance with the Criminal Law have not been complained about or the complaint has been withdrawn.

    5. The criminal suspect or defendant is deceased.

    6. Other laws provide for exemption from criminal liability.

    Legal basisArticle 16 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.

    Here's an exampleA suspect committed intentional homicide. Combined with the various circumstances of his crimes, he could be sentenced to 18 years in prison. However, the statutory maximum penalty for intentional homicide is the death penalty, so it takes 20 years, that is, the criminal suspect will no longer be held criminally responsible after 20 years without being investigated by the public security organs.

    However, if someone reports to the police after the case is discovered, the public security organs have already opened a case for investigation. No matter how many years a criminal suspect has been on the run, he or she must be held criminally responsible. Therefore, the statutory maximum sentence mentioned here is the statutory maximum sentence for the criminal suspect's crime.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    The statutory circumstances under which criminal responsibility is not pursued are: 1. The circumstances are obviously minor and the harm is not great, and it is not considered a crime;

    2. The statute of limitations for prosecution has already expired;

    3. Those who have been exempted from punishment by a special amnesty order;

    In our country, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress has the right to decide on amnesty. Such amnesty orders have the legal effect of terminating criminal prosecutions;

    4. Crimes that are handled only after being told in accordance with the Criminal Law, and there is no complaint or withdrawal of the complaint;

    5. The criminal suspect or defendant is deceased;

    6. Other laws provide exemption from criminal responsibility. According to the relevant legal provisions, if the people's court discovers any of the above circumstances in a private prosecution case during the case filing stage, it shall not accept it;

    In any of the circumstances described above in a public prosecution case, the public security organs and people's procuratorates shall make a decision not to file the case. During the trial phase, in the first case above, the people's court shall rule that Jian Xiao is not guilty;

    For the remaining five situations, a ruling should generally be made to terminate the trial. However, where it can be confirmed that the deceased defendant is not guilty on the basis of the ascertained facts of the case and the ascertained evidentiary materials, the people's court shall make a judgment declaring the defendant not guilty.

    Legal basis] Article 16 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.

    In any of the following circumstances, criminal responsibility is not pursued, and where it has already been pursued, the case shall be withdrawn, or not prosecuted, or the trial shall be terminated, or acquitted: (1) The circumstances are obviously minor and the harm is not great, and it is not considered a crime;

    2. The statute of limitations for prosecution has expired.

    3. Those who have been exempted from punishment by amnesty order.

    4) Crimes that are handled only after a complaint is made in accordance with the Criminal Law, and the complaint is not told or withdrawn;

    5. The criminal suspect or defendant is deceased.

    6) Other laws provide for exemption from criminal responsibility.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Legal analysis: According to the relevant laws and regulations of the country, the statutory circumstances for not pursuing criminal responsibility are: (1) the circumstances are obviously minor and the harm is not great, and it is not considered a crime; 2. The statute of limitations for prosecution has expired. 3. Those who have been exempted from punishment by amnesty order. 4. Crimes that are handled only after being complained in accordance with the Criminal Law have not been complained about or the complaint has been withdrawn. 5. The criminal suspect or defendant is deceased. 6) Other laws provide for exemption from criminal responsibility.

    Legal basis: Article 16 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: In any of the following circumstances, criminal responsibility is not pursued, and where it has already been pursued, the case shall be withdrawn, or not prosecuted, or the trial shall be terminated, or acquitted: (1) The circumstances are obviously minor and the harm is not great, and it is not considered a crime; 2. The statute of limitations for prosecution has expired. 3. Those who have been exempted from punishment by amnesty order. 4. Crimes that are handled only after being complained in accordance with the Criminal Law have not been complained about or the complaint has been withdrawn. 5. The criminal suspect or defendant is deceased. 6) Other laws provide for exemption from criminal responsibility.

Related questions
3 answers2024-07-24

Investigate.

After criminal settlement, criminal responsibility is still to be pursued in accordance with law, but the public security organs and procuratorates will recommend a lenient punishment, and where the circumstances of the crime are minor and no criminal punishment is necessary, a decision may be made not to prosecute. The people's court may give a lenient punishment to the defendant in accordance with law. >>>More

7 answers2024-07-24

Refusal to enforce a court judgment constitutes the crime of refusing to enforce a court judgment. Article 313 of the Criminal Law stipulates that a person who refuses to enforce a judgment or ruling of a people's court who has the ability to do so, and the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or a fine. >>>More

11 answers2024-07-24

China still has the right to pursue Chen Shifeng's criminal responsibility, because Chen Shifeng and the victim are both Chinese citizens, and China has jurisdiction over the case according to the principle of personae. Article 10 of the Criminal Law: Where crimes committed outside the territory of the People's Republic of China shall bear criminal responsibility in accordance with this Law, although they have been tried in a foreign country, they may still be pursued in accordance with this Law, but where they have already received criminal punishment in a foreign country, punishment may be waived or commuted. After Chen Shifeng is released from prison and repatriated to China, China still has the right to pursue his criminal responsibility in accordance with its own laws.

3 answers2024-07-24

Principal offenders and their criminal responsibility: The ringleaders who organize and lead a criminal group to carry out criminal activities shall be punished in accordance with all the crimes committed by the group, that is, in addition to bearing criminal responsibility for the specific crimes they directly committed and their consequences, they must also bear criminal responsibility for all the crimes committed by the group members in accordance with the group's criminal plan. However, the ringleader is not criminally liable for crimes committed by the group members beyond the group criminal plan (group criminal intention). >>>More

3 answers2024-07-24

The burden of proof of the guilt of the defendant in a public prosecution case shall be borne by the people's procuratorate. In a prosecuted criminal case, the general rule for the allocation of the burden of proof is that the prosecution bears the burden of proof, and the defendant does not bear the burden of proof. At trial, the prosecution must provide the court with sufficient evidence to prove the facts of the crime as charged, and the evidence must meet the legal standards. >>>More