Would I rather believe in a good group than in a good person?

People's hearts are diverse, each has its own scheming, regardless of daily life, or workplace competition, although there is no harm to others, but the heart of defense is still reasonable, so mutual suspicion, the mentality of deception has arisen, and it is good to compete with each other, do not rule out the situation of you fighting for me, malicious harm, the key is to tolerate and communicate with each other, but reluctantly, not everyone is like-minded, regardless of the gains and losses of interests, the mentality is a little flat, and they are low-key in their own life and things, and flexibly adjust their mentality. The way of thinking and the skills of dealing with people, struggle is a must, otherwise bread and love are not guaranteed, gradually improve and enhance the competitive strength, always remind yourself to be calm and composed, do your best, opportunities will always appear, as for the trust of others, get along well or not, not subjective thoughts can change, so, everything is fate, not just divided, waiting for like-minded people to appear.

I'd rather believe in a good group than a good person, because you have suffered in this area, or because you feel that a good person can change into a bad person, because good people and bad people are just a thought. So you'd rather believe in a good group than a good person.

In my own team, people have rules to restrict, and there are no scruples if I am an individual.

I'd rather believe in a good group than in a person, and I'm right because this person is unpredictable right now.

I'd rather believe in a good group than a good person. There are many biases in my own understanding, and the best way is to correct them.

This statement is not true, only by believing in a good person can a good group be produced, because a group is made up of many people.

I'd rather believe in a good group than in one. A good person says that, and a good person doesn't necessarily speak so reliable.

Good groups and good people are worth trusting, and good groups are more trustworthy than good groups.

If you want to be extreme, after all, a good person is trustworthy, there are many kinds of people in a good team, but not everyone can be good to you, so instead of believing in a good team, it is better to believe in a good person, he can treat you better.

It's a matter of self-confidence. It is recommended to eat more spicy food, put some ginger and drink a little wine. Eat enough.

Hehe, it's easy to say, but it's hard to meet yourself.

Then believe her, people's hearts are flesh and blood.

Don't base your thoughts on other people's words.

Love someone! The disadvantages are also the pros!

Didn't trust you that much.

That's all the sadness I had.

Just be worthy of your heart.

If everyone does a good job, then this society is also good, and if everyone manages themselves well, this society is also good! Even everyone is so selfish! Take care of yourself, and their society is perfect!

Really? I think I can eat and sleep.

Because you don't have feelings for him. Actually, he treats you well, you can try to get along with him slowly, if you like it, you get along, and if you don't like it, you get it. He is a person worthy of your love, caring and responsible, he is caring for you and not laughing at you, don't think too much!

If you feel insecure about this person, it must be his aspect or some other reason that causes you to distance yourself from him, or even reluctance to socialize, weigh it yourself, if a person's aspect makes you feel unacceptable, distance yourself as soon as possible, if you still think that he is good in that aspect, it means that you still have a good impression of him, maybe people are the same, the easier it is to get, the less you care.

In fact, the boy next to you is your dependence, he has been silently accompanying you, hoping that one day you will turn around and see him behind you.

I prefer to believe that no matter what values you express, you are still sincere and kind. It's just that the horizon will be limited to one person, which barely means anything.

Probably a tactful refusal.

It was a green lantern that did not return, but because of the turbid wine and the dust.