If the house is not bought, can the commission to the agent be refunded?

It depends on what the situation is. Let me give you an example: the buyer and the seller sign a tripartite intermediary contract with the intermediary company, and the buyer pays the deposit and intermediary fee, which is no problem, you can recognize it.

But later, one of the buyers and sellers repented, and it was said that the buyer repented, so it was unreasonable for him to ask the intermediary to refund the intermediary fee, and it was not supported. The intermediary has completed its own intermediary work, and after signing the tripartite contract, it has the right to collect intermediary fees according to the regulations, and the intermediary work has been completed. Furthermore, the intermediary has not breached the contract and should not bear any liability for the buyer, so the intermediary fee charged is non-refundable.

The above is just one of the situations that can not be refunded, and does not represent your situation, would you like to talk about it in detail?

The ** of commercial housing is soaring, and now commercial housing is generally high-rise, and everyone likes the middle floor. When buying a house, everyone doesn't like the low-rise and top-floor houses, and the ** of this kind of house is relatively low.

1. Dampness. Low-rise houses are very humid because they are closest to the ground, especially on rainy days, and over time, they can get rheumatism. The first floor has always been a floor that everyone rejects, if you have bought the owner of the first floor, you can design an overhead floor, which can avoid the above problems.

When the developer is building a building, in order to better improve the first floor, when designing, it is generally a basement of about 1.5 meters on the ground floor, so as to avoid dampness on the first floor. The developer's marketing strategy is to give the basement to the owner who buys the first floor.

2. Security. In addition to dampness, the reason why the first floor is not considered is mainly for safety reasons. The house on the first floor should be renovated with anti-theft windows, otherwise it will really be patronized by thieves.

The house on the ground floor has poor privacy. If you don't draw the curtains during the day, you feel very unsafe, and if you do pull them up, you feel very depressed. However, if there is no shelter in front of the first floor of some houses, the curtains will not affect the lighting if the lighting is possible.

The biggest advantage of the first floor is that you don't have to wait for the elevator, even if the power goes out, it will not have much impact on life, in addition, when the water in the community is out, there is a high possibility of water on the first floor. The house is to live comfortably, although there are many disadvantages on the first floor, the choice is still based on your actual needs.

If the intermediary fails to return the fee as agreed, if the negotiation fails, it can collect evidence and file a lawsuit with the court.

The agent deceived you into buying a house and said that you would be given a rebate, but in the end it did not give you cash, you should complain about it through the consumer association, but you need to have relevant documentary evidence. Or bring relevant documentary evidence to the court to sue for contract disputes, requiring it to fulfill its promises.

Hello dear, I'm glad to answer for you. The intermediary does not return the commission, and the fraud can be resolved through the litigation process. From a legal point of view:

According to the relevant laws and regulations, the handling of the non-return of the house purchase commission is as follows, if the negotiation fails, you can collect evidence, and then file a lawsuit with the court, if the two parties have reached a written agreement on the return of the commission, you can keep the relevant evidence, sue for the return of the price and the corresponding liquidated damages, the intermediary may be suspected of colluding to damage the interests of the buyer, seek legal aid, and can protect their legitimate rights and interests through legal channels. According to the relevant laws and regulations, if the intermediary facilitates the conclusion of the contract, the client shall pay the remuneration as agreed. Where the conclusion of a contract is facilitated by the intermediary providing intermediary services for the conclusion of the contract, the parties to the contract shall bear the intermediary's remuneration equally.

In order to avoid disputes, any promise must be put into writing, and the personal signature will take effect, and the company must stamp the special seal of the unit to take effect, and the recording and witness testimony can be used as evidence.

Summary. If the second-hand housing agent has promised a rebate point when the buyer buys the house, but the agent regrets not fulfilling the promise after the purchase, it should be complained to it through the consumer association, but the buyer needs to have written evidence in his own hands, and he can also bring relevant written evidence to the court to sue for the promise to fulfill the promise. Therefore, if the intermediary has a promised rebate point, you must pay attention to leaving evidence.

If the second-hand housing agent has promised the rebate point when the buyer buys the house, but the intermediary regrets not fulfilling the promise after the purchase, it should be complained to it through the consumer association, but the buyer needs to have written evidence in his own hands, and he can also take the relevant written evidence to the court to sue for the promise of the promise. Therefore, if the intermediary has a commitment to rebate points, you must pay attention to leaving evidence.

This evidence is not possible.

This is clear no.

Yes, very clearly.

If there is no problem, you can go to the consumer association to complain, or directly sue in court.

Thank you. It doesn't cost money to go to consumer associations and courts.

Haha, it doesn't cost anything to complain to the consumer association, and if you go to the court to file a lawsuit, it will cost a little money, and you will get the court's consultation on how much.

If there is no such clause in the contract or agreement signed at that time, then you can sue him to protect your rights and interests, if there is no such clause, it will be difficult to come back, because if there is no contract, even the law will not support you, and everything needs to be resolved through negotiation between you and the intermediary.

If the agent promises a commission refund, but does not give it, you can complain to them.

Before doing this, you should sign a written certificate, otherwise there is no basis for your words, and it is difficult to get back the commission promised by the intermediary.

Legal analysis: If the intermediary fails to facilitate the conclusion of the contract, he shall not be required to pay remuneration, but may require the principal to pay the necessary expenses incurred in engaging in intermediary activities.

The activities of the real estate agency shall be subject to the provisions of the law, no matter who causes the contract of sale and purchase of the house to be not signed, that is, the intermediary task is not completed, the intermediary is not entitled to receive the commission for the first period, and at most can only charge the necessary expenses (transportation expenses, communication expenses, etc.).

Legal basis: Destruction of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Article 964 If the intermediary fails to facilitate the conclusion of the contract, it shall not request payment of remuneration, and may request the client to pay the necessary expenses incurred in the intermediary activities in accordance with the agreement.