How much responsibility should the hotel take for responding to the drowning of tourists on a privat

A tourist drowned on a private beach" also caused a series of doubts among netizens after such an incident, what is the reason for such an accident? After all, shouldn't hotels give them reasonable security measures for private beaches? For such words, it is also a protection for tourists, after all, in such a situation, will there be consumers to choose?

But after we learned about it, the hotel made such a response, which also made us extremely shockedFor these problems, I am not within the jurisdiction of the hotel, and it is also caused by the lack of safety awareness of touristsThere are also certain problems in the private beach of this matter, because according to the family of the person concerned, such a private beach is a public beach, and the hotel management also indicated to us that these may be caused by the propaganda department, but it also triggered a series of anger among netizens, after all, in this case, isn't this also an act that violates other people's right to know? <>

"Private beach" has become a "public place" for no reason, for such information concealment actually brings an angry emotion to everyone, many times when we choose a place, the hotel can completely inform all the circumstances and then go to the consumer to choose, otherwise in this false form to carry out, then it is also a primary irresponsibility to others, everyone is an individual, all enjoy their own personal rights, In such a situation, there has been a certain infringement of their right to know. <>

For such a thing in the situation, I also hope that the relevant departments will make a reasonable explanation, after all, for such an accident is actually a great trauma to the family, and the spread of false information should also be reasonably stopped, only in this way can the legitimate rights and interests of consumers be protected. <>

The hotel believes that the private beach is a public area, they should not be held responsible, the responsibility should belong to the family, this kind of hotel said before the accident is its own to attract tourists, and if something happens, quickly clear up the relationship.

I think the hotel needs to take half of the blame, because this private beach is advertised by the hotel to make tourists go there for swimming.

The hotel should bear 30% of the responsibility and the guest should bear 70% of the responsibility. Because of the negligence of the hotel's management, it can lead to tourists breaking into the beach and drowning. Therefore, the main responsibility lies with the tourists, and the secondary responsibility is the hotel.

The main responsibility should be borne because the local institutions should be more supervised.

The sea area where the incident occurred belongs to the Qionghai Boao Daoji Seaview HotelPrivate seas, hotelResponsibility should be taken for the accidentAnd this is not the first accident to have occurred in the hotel's private waters.

Without being informed of the sea conditions and without seeing any warning of danger, Mr. Yeung walked into the hotel's private beach, which he thought should be safe, to swim. The family members on the shore found the abnormality and immediately asked the hotel for help, but the hotel front desk said that there were no rescue measures, and they needed to report to the superior for instructions before arranging, and there was no feedback and reply to the family's call for help during the period, and there was no active rescue measure. It was much later that rescuers arrived late and missed the precious rescue opportunity, and Mr. Yang's body was finally washed back to shore by the waves.

Life is very precious, and a series of safety measures should be taken when the hotel can use its own private sea to play and go to the sea for various activities, and be equipped with professionals to rescue in the sea area.

Sadly, this is not the first major accident in the hotel due to the untimely rescue of the hotel, there were already people in the hotel sea area the day before the incident.

In fact, if the hotel's security measures and rescue measures were in place, it would not have caused any problems for the lives of tourists, and Mr. Yang's family immediately asked the hotel for help when they found out that the situation was critical, but in exchange for the hotel's prevarication.

What's even infuriating is that the hotel hastily put up a warning sign on the beach after the accident, and that's it.

The hotel has always created a high-standard living model, but it neglects the most basic safety, which is really unacceptable.

The loss of a young life is heart-wrenching, because it is not only a person, but also a family behind it.

The hotel is primarily responsible for the safety of its own private maritime area, and it is responsible for failing to take measures when the problem occurs.

Going out to play is a happy thing in itself, and I hope that the hotel will pay enough attention to the accident and improve its own safety measures.

Adults, they are responsible for doing their own things, others do not need to be responsible, blackmail.

Three people drowned in a sea area in Boao, Hainan Province in 2 days, and the beach where the incident occurred was a private area of the hotel. The hotel should take full responsibility for this accident.

The beach where the incident occurred belongs to the public area, not the hotel is private, it belongs to the public space, and the hotel still needs to take responsibility, after all, they are the residents here, and now that there is an accident, there are some of their responsibilities.

Going out on holiday is meant to be a pleasant and joyful thing. But in a resort hotel in Xunliao Bay, Huizhou, there was a drowning accident. Tourists were attracted by the hotel's promotional poster and were attracted by the hotel's private beach, but after checking into the hotel, they had an accident while swimming in the beach.

The hotel should bear the main responsibility for this kind of accident, the hotel under the banner of a private beach, but did not improve the management of the beach, which eventually led to the accident, and the tourists did not confirm whether the environment is safe when playing, which eventually led to the accident.

1. There are no warning signs on the beach, and the hotel is responsible for poor management. After the incident, the family approached the person in charge of the hotel for an explanation, but was told that the private beach was a public area. Since it is a public area, it should not be used to advertise the words such as private beach, and the beach is behind the hotel, the hotel does not give any warning signs, if it will remind tourists that there is no safety management in this sea area, tourists pay attention to the warning, do not swim, and the accident may not happen.

If it's a private beach, it should be managed accordingly.

2. The hotel shall be held liable for insufficient security measures. If the hotel is the manager of the beach, it should be responsible for the safety of visitors to the beach. First aid personnel and first aid facilities should be arranged on the beach.

The tourist who had an accident was drowned because of the untimely rescue, which shows that the hotel's safety measures are not in place. Therefore, the hotel needs to bear the main responsibility in this matter.

3. When you go out to play, confirm the safeguard measures. Visitors should do so on their own safety no matter where they go. When you go swimming in the beach, you have to make sure that the sea is open and managed, so that there will be safety measures in the sea area.

Don't go to the unopened sea area, because without professional rescue personnel management, even if an accident occurs, the rescue will not be too late.

The hotel is definitely responsible. Because the hotel management is not strict, it will lead to tourists breaking in and causing accidents, so the hotel is responsible for this matter.

I think so, because the beach is a hotel facility, tourists will drown not only because of their own safety awareness, but also because the hotel's protective measures are not enough.

If the hotel does not set up safety signs or cordons on the beach, the hotel is responsible and cannot escape responsibility. The hotel has the obligation to ensure the safety of tourists, and the hotel should be responsible.

The hotel should be partially responsible, because since the hotel is equipped with a private beach for tourists to use, it should be prepared in advance, and there should be a professional security officer on the beach to protect the safety of tourists.

The hotel does have to bear some responsibility, as swimming on such a private beach is actually supervised.

The beach is a public domain, and the location of the guest's accident is not within the scope of the hotel's operation, so the hotel is not responsible.

As the owner of the so-called "private beach", the hotel has an unshirkable main responsibility, because the swimming service is provided without the corresponding safety measures, and the tourists are also very responsible.

Because the promotion has a private beach and third-party facilities, even if you don't know about it, you will have a small amount of joint and several liability, and this part of the responsibility depends on the mediation between the parties and the hotel.

I think that this should be the responsibility of the tourists themselves, and the reason why the death can happen is entirely because I was not prepared in advance.

Take your own responsibility. Diving drowning is your own cause, and generally speaking, no one else is to blame for this kind of self-play death.

A tourist drowned in Sanya, this incident should definitely be the diving company to be responsible, they did not take good care of the customer, resulting in the drowning of the customer!

If he violates the rules to swim in the water, he is naturally responsible, or if he drowns normally, this is the responsibility of the tourist area.

Personally, I think the hotel should be primarily responsible. This incident occurred in a hotel in Huizhou City, Guangdong, because the tourist saw on the promotional page that this hotel has a private beach to play, so stayed in this hotel, did not expect the tourist's relatives to go to the private beach to swim, but did not expect to have a drowning situation, and because the rescue was not timely, resulting in the tourist's relatives drowning to death. It was supposed to be a good holiday, but because something like this happened, the mood can be imagined to be heavy.

The hotel believes that the private beach does not belong to the hotel, so the hotel should not bear the loss in this regard, and the victim believes that he chose to stay in this hotel because he took a fancy to the private beach to which the hotel belongs, but he did not expect such an accident to occur, so the hotel should bear this responsibility.

According to the tourist, he came to stay in this hotel because he saw the hotel on the leaflet with a private beach to make a boo, then the hotel should obviously be responsible, and the hotel's management of the private beach is not standardized enough, even if it is not the scope of the hotel, you can also place a striking sign next to it to remind tourists that the water depth is dangerous, of course, you can also explain to tourists when the tourists check in, this private beach does not belong to the scope of the hotel, and the hotel is not responsible for anything. But apparently the hotel did not do this, and it is estimated that they are also afraid that the private beach does not belong to the hotel, which will lead to the loss of some customers.

Of course, it cannot be said that the entire responsibility lies with the hotel, and the tourists themselves also have a certain responsibility. However, at present, there is no clear indication between the hotel and the tourists which party is responsible, and both sides have their own opinions, and no one is convinced by the other anyway. Therefore, when you go out to play, you must pay attention to your personal safety, and when you check into the hotel, you must understand the situation around the hotel.

This should be the primary responsibility of the hotel, as there should be safety warnings and safety lifeguards since such facilities are set up.

The main responsibility should be borne by the hotel, which did not estimate the danger of the private beach, did not arrange personnel to eliminate the dangerous situation, and did not remind tourists to swim and set up a protection mechanism.

The parties bear the main responsibility, after all, the beach should be a public place and does not belong to the hotel, so the hotel should not be responsible.

I think the hotel should take the main responsibility, after all, this private beach is owned by the hotel, and the hotel management should inform tourists about the dangers of the beach.

Whether the hotel should be responsible for the drowning of tourists swimming on the hotel's so-called private beach depends on how the hotel advertises to the outside world. If the hotel's external publicity makes it clear that the beach outside the hotel is the hotel's private beach. Well, the hotel should be responsible for the death of the tourist.

Of course, if the hotel does not make it clear in the external publicity, the beach is the hotel's private beach. Then, it may be difficult to hold the hotel accountable. It is reported that at present, the hotel has made it clear that the tourist had an accident outside the hotel and is not within the jurisdiction of the hotel.

Therefore, there is nothing to be responsible or explain for the hotel itself.

It is reported that the tourist who had the accident was an old man who was already 70 years old, and the reason why this old man had an accident was whether he was physically unwell or an accident that occurred while playing, no one could say clearly. The hotel's claim to be a private beach is not true, and the beach outside the hotel is not owned by individuals.

The hotel said that this incident was not directly related to them, and they did not know about it, and the hotel felt that they did not need to be responsible or explained whether they should be held responsible for this matter. There is no definite word on whether the tourist's family will defend their rights through legal means.

Tourists mostly come out to relax, but also to relax. This kind of thing is difficult for anyone to accept. After all, there is only one life and such a thing happens, most people will first question whether the hotel's various measures are complete.

Obviously, there is nothing to be done about this place, which claims to be a private beach. It is believed that this is also the main reason for the drowning of tourists. Of course, the elderly who are already 70 years old should be taken care of and accompanied by someone when they are out playing, and the children of the elderly should also feel guilty and blame themselves, and should not put all the responsibility on the hotel.