The woman bought amoxicillin and found live worms, and the pharmaceutical company said that it was a

Personally, I think it is indeed possible that it is artificially made, because the production requirements of amoxicillin are very strict, and this should not be the case.

I think pharmaceutical companies are irresponsible, the pills have not been opened yet, how can it be artificially manufactured, you should first find your own reasons to see if there is a problem with the production line.

I think it's possible, but it's more likely to be artificially made, because the general pharmaceutical products are very strictly controlled, and it is even more doubtful that they are still live insects.

I think it is unlikely that live insects appear in the medicine, because the drugs are generated in a high-temperature and oxygen-free environment, but the specific results and process will still have to wait for the results of the investigation to know.

A woman's pharmacy bought amoxicillin and found live insects, the pharmaceutical company initially said that it would compensate for similar products, and the lady did not need to promise to compensate three times the product**, but the woman said that she was not asking for money but hoped that the pharmaceutical company would pay attention to the health and safety of the drug, and then the production pharmaceutical factory said that this was a clumsy incident created by man-made and would be investigated by the police. At the moment, there are no final findings.

1. Incident combingOn November 5, a woman in Zibo, Shandong Province was unwell enough to buy amoxicillin, a penicillin antibiotic produced by Anhui Anke Hengyi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. When he was about to take the medicine, he opened the inner packaging of the medicine and found a live worm crawling, and then reacted to the pharmacy.

2. After the two parties responded to the drugstore's response to the manufacturer, the pharmaceutical factory asked the pharmacy to compensate the woman for two boxes of similar products. The factory said it could pay three times the amount of compensation. But Ms. Zhang said that she didn't ask for money, but just hoped that the pharmaceutical company would pay attention to hygiene and control drug safety when producing drugs.

Subsequently, according to the manufacturer, the production of drugs needs to be in a high-temperature and oxygen-free environment, and live insects cannot appear in the inner packaging, indicating that this is a clumsy incident made by man, and will be reported to the police. At present, there is no final result, and I hope that the investigation will be clear and give consumers an explanation as soon as possible.

3. Strictly control drug safety, whether it is food safety or drug safety, it should be strictly controlled, especially drugs, which are used for ** diseases, if the production quality is not up to standard, how to ensure that there will be a certain efficacy. In the production process, the quality should be controlled, the risk should be minimized, and the health and safety of drugs should be done. During transportation, it is also necessary to do a good job of sanitation to prevent the product from deteriorating due to distance and temperature, and the store should be disinfected to make the product safe and harmless in the hands of consumers.

In this incident, both sides did not stand in line for the time being, waiting for the results of the investigation by the relevant departments, and finally, they hoped to give consumers an explanation and let the people use drugs safely.

After the woman went to the pharmacy, the pharmaceutical company initially agreed that it could compensate for similar products but the woman was unwilling, and finally agreed that the pharmaceutical company would compensate three times the product**, but later the pharmaceutical company thought that this was a man-made incident and would take police treatment, and the final result was not yet known.

In fact, the final result did not come out, the pharmaceutical factory that produced the medicine at that time said to change the box for the woman, but the woman said that she didn't need it, and only hoped that the factory could pay attention to it in the future, and the pharmaceutical factory on the other hand thought that it was artificial, and it is still under investigation.

The pharmacy never replied to the woman, and the pharmaceutical company said that the drug was made in a high-temperature sterilization environment, and there could be no live insects, so it was thought that someone had deliberately put it, and the pharmaceutical company said that it would call the police to deal with it.

The factory promised to pay three times the compensation, but Ms. Zhang did not want the money, and now waits for the results of the investigation by the relevant departments, hoping to give consumers a satisfactory explanation, so that the people can use drugs safely.

There is no final result yet, and the pharmaceutical factory said that it must be a counterfeit drug, because the drug production process is high-temperature sterilization, and it is impossible for live insects to appear. Further investigation is ongoing.

The person in charge of the brand department of the pharmaceutical company involved said that the drug production is in a high-temperature oxygen-free environment, and there can be no live insects, and the insects in the capsules are obviously artificially made and the means are clumsy. This matter is suspected of extortion, and they will report it to **.

Zhang immediately contacted the pharmacy to defend his rights, and Zhang said that the pharmacy staff had a good attitude at the beginning, and he also told his home address, but no one solved it.

The manufacturer said that he could let the pharmacy give Zhang two more boxes of medicine, but Zhang said that he didn't like it very much, saying that he could eat two more boxes of medicine.

The staff of the manufacturer said that if the bug entered the factory, it would be too lively, and there is no way to determine whether the responsibility is in the manufacturer or transportation, and the follow-up will be solved according to the actual situation.

The pharmaceutical company said that it may be a counterfeit drug and has reported the case. Amoxicillin is produced in a high-temperature, oxygen-free environment and does not produce eggs.

Medicines are closely related to the health of the people, and anything about medicines is not a trivial matter. The discovery of bugs in amoxicillin is a very serious problem, and the pharmacy did not respond, while the pharmaceutical company responded in a joking tone, which is simply hateful. The departments concerned should strictly investigate and deal with the situation so that the people can take safe medicine.

I think it's reasonable, because anyone who has seen the drug production workshop knows that the management is very strict, it is a sterile workshop, and the packaging of the medicine is vacuum, and it is impossible for insects to survive.

The pharmaceutical company responded that the presence of live worms in the amoxicillin bought in the pharmacy was caused by man-made, but in my personal opinion, the consumer just wanted to buy amoxicillin, and she had no way to put the live worms into the sealed medicine, and I felt that the pharmaceutical company was perfunctory.

The drug worms are very abnormal, and besides, they are anti-inflammatory. The development of live insects shows that the quality of the drug is problematic, and I hope that the pharmaceutical company can give you a reasonable explanation.

This reflects that there is a great suspicion of shirking responsibility in pharmaceutical companies, and until now, pharmaceutical companies have been emphasizing that there is no problem in every link, and also emphasizing that someone deliberately put the worm in.

It should be the reason for the pharmaceutical company.

After all, sometimes it is common to accidentally drop something on the production line, but the probability is small.

I think the argument of the pharmaceutical company is very reliable, after all, the bug is still alive, and the possibility of the responsibility is greatly reduced.

I think the response of the pharmaceutical companies is very general, and they do not clarify their responsibilities, because the response of the pharmaceutical companies seems to be shirking.

In this case, I believe that pharmacies have a responsibility for safety management. Because pharmacies do not pay attention to the quality of the goods when they buy them, they must be responsible for such a thing.

I think we should thoroughly investigate which link is wrong, whether it is unqualified hygiene, and we must severely punish bad businesses, regardless of the safety of consumers.

I think it may be that the customer is touching the porcelain, because the drugs are vacuum-packed, and the insects can't survive in it at all, and the production workshops of the drugs are very strict aseptic workshops, and there will be no insects.

First of all, whether the live worm is in the medicine or in the box or on the counter. At the counter, it should be that the clerk did not do a good job of hygiene, and there is a hidden danger on the box, if it is in the pill, it is really a big deal.

It should be the pharmaceutical company that is responsible. Because it is a live worm found in a capsule. You can take the medicine to check whether there is a quality problem.

I think this matter should be the responsibility of the processing plant that produces the drug, after all, it is their failure to do a good job of inspection during production, which leads to such a big problem with the drug.

Pharmacies, because pharmacies should first check when entering the manufacturer's medicines, if any problems are found in the verification process, they can ask the manufacturer to return the goods, the pharmacies do not find problems and sell the drugs to customers, and the pharmacies should be responsible for the customers who find problems and verify.

I think the pharmacy should be responsible for this matter, because if the essential work of the pharmacy is not done well, it will cause a bad impact.

According to the actual situation, if the drug packaging is intact, then the company is responsible, if the packaging is damaged, it may also enter later.

I think it is important to investigate who the problem is, because in the process of drug production, it is almost impossible to have bugs, and the medicines are sealed and packaged, and bugs cannot survive, so it may be that there is a problem with the storage of the pharmacy.

I think the drug manufacturer is responsible, because the drug is not opened, and the live insects inside must be caused by a problem on the production line.

I think both pharmacies and pharmaceutical factories are responsible, and they are not doing their duty.

The manufacturer should be responsible for this, because whether there are insects during transportation or production, this is a quality problem, if your product is sealed tightly enough, sterilization is thorough enough, this will not happen.

Supposedly, it must have been the person in charge of manufacturing the drug. However, the details of this matter are still under investigation. Let's wait and see.

Pharmacies and manufacturers are responsible. Because the origin of the live insects is not known, it is not the customer's own problem, and it can only be borne by both the pharmacy and the manufacturer.

On November 5, 2020, a Ms. Zhang in Shandong Province purchased an amoxicillin tablet at a pharmacy. Unexpectedly, after taking it home, she found that there were live insects in amoxicillin pills, which surprised Ms. Zhang. In the ** posted by Ms. Zhang, you can see this particularly small bug, crawling around in amoxicillin, and it is still alive.

Pharmaceuticals are produced at high temperatures and in an oxygen-free environment.

Under normal circumstances, it is impossible for live insects to exist in amoxicillin, but this woman saw live insects in amoxicillin. It can be said that this bug is too alive. At present, the woman has gone to the pharmacy to inquire, but has not received any answer.

However, the person in charge of the drug responded to this, claiming that amoxicillin was produced in an anaerobic environment, and there could be no live insects, and it may be insects that someone used means to make it.

They have reported to the police that this matter is suspected of extortion. In fact, when the woman was filming **, she could see that she basically had no opening on it, and this kind of live insect incident appeared just after cutting it open. This woman definitely didn't want to ask for money to do this, after all, she had spent so much money so hard, and it was too unnecessary to put worms in it, right?

And when the woman heard that the company would compensate her, she also said that there was no need, and she only hoped that the manufacturer could carefully produce the drug and not have such a similar incident again. The woman also said that she would not buy any medicines in this store in the future, and the staff is currently negotiating with Ms. Zhang. If the problem cannot be resolved, legal proceedings will be followed.

In fact, if this bug is able to survive in this way, it has gone through a series of situations.

It is processed from the factory and sold to various pharmacies to the woman。It had been alive inside for so many days, how could such a thing be? So there are certain doubts.

Basically, there are drug administrations in pharmacies that conduct testing, and it is impossible to determine who is responsible. If this situation occurs during transportation, it should be borne by the transportation team.

The reply of the owner of the pharmacy was very infuriating. He said that it is normal to find insects in traditional Chinese medicine, and he used this excuse to shirk responsibility.

The pharmacy said that it would make some compensation for this matter, and it would carry out some humanistic care in the future.

The pharmacy said that it would compensate the woman and would give her twice the price of the drug, but the pharmacy did not expect such a situation, and later reacted to the pharmaceutical company that produced it, hoping that they would pay attention.

Give two more boxes of medicine. After the woman found the live worms in the drug, she reported the situation to the pharmacy in time, and the pharmacy staff said that they would compensate the consumer for the loss by giving two more boxes of medicine.

The pharmaceutical company responded that this could not happen, it must be man-made, and it was obvious that they did not want to be responsible.

The pharmaceutical company said that it was not sure whether it was the manufacturer's reason, and it would be resolved according to the actual situation.

The pharmaceutical company responded that if the bug was put in the factory, then the bug was too live, and the subsequent manufacturer would deal with it according to the actual situation.

Pharmaceutical companies responded: The production of drugs is in a high-temperature oxygen-free environment, and there can be no live insects, and they also said that the insects in the capsules are obviously artificially made, and the means are very clumsy.

The pharmaceutical company said that it would thoroughly investigate the cause of this incident and draw inferences from one case to avoid the recurrence of the problem. I also expressed my deep apologies to our customers.

The pharmaceutical company responded that it was impossible, thinking that someone was making trouble in it, and said that the bugs were still alive, which was too alive.

Pharmaceutical companies say that drugs will be sterilized at high temperatures during the production process, so there will definitely be no living bodies, and pharmaceutical companies feel that someone is deliberately framing.