Why do you say that the era of US hegemony is coming to an end?

Updated on military 2024-07-20
21 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    The national sovereignty of the United States has been decomposed and disintegrated, and the influence of the United States has become lower and lower, and it has also been countered and sanctioned by other countries, so it is said that the era of American hegemony is about to come to an end.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    The article says that US hegemony is not only facing a crisis, but is also in decline. Abandoning the dollar in Eurasia and the wider global** is one of the signs that hegemony is coming to an end.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Diversification is very important, and now the development of many countries is very good, and it is impossible to continue to be hegemonic.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    First of all, we need to analyze why the United States was able to becomeWorld hegemon。First, it's AmericanThe country is strong;Both military and economic power stand at the top of the world. And Russia in recent years in its development,The economic situation is not very good, especially around 2015The economic strength has plummeted

    Although the economic situation has improved in recent years, it is still much worse than that of the United States.

    There is that that of RussiaHeavy industry is developing very strongly, but in light and traditional industry, Russia is in the worldLow level。A few years ago, very simple clothes, cloths, handicrafts in Russia had to be in other countriesImported in large quantities。There used to be a story that said:

    Russia can make missiles, it can go to the moon, but it can't make ballpoint pens. It can be seen how poor the level of light industry in Russia is. SoThe economic level will not go up

    If the economic level cannot be improved, it is very likely that we will lose the struggle for world hegemony.

    In addition, even without the United States, there are some economically powerful countries such as Germany, the United Kingdom, and France, including China. Britain, France and other countries are also the sameDeveloped countries, economic strength, military strength is not weak. Although the country is relatively small, it is enough to compete with Russia in terms of overall circumstancesCounteract

    Besides, China is owned by a few fewLaunch of Sputnikcountries. Aviation and navigation capabilities are in the forefront of the world, and they are no worse than Russia. China also hasNuclear**

    Although Russia and China have good relations on the surface, they are actually behind the scenesHarboring a ghost

    Judging from the above situation, even without the United States, Russia still wants to become a world hegemonThere are certain difficulties

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    No, because although Russia has a military strength second only to the United States, its economy is similar to that of Pakistan, far worse than China, and its population is only a little more than 100 million, which is not as high as China and European powers in terms of number and economy.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Even without the United States, it is difficult for Russia to become a hegemon, and the strength of our country does not allow it, and our strength in China is also very strong.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    If the United States completely declines and re-isolates, there is still only so much Russia can do. After the disintegration, Da Mao not only had an economic downturn that was far from what it was at the beginning, but also lost a complete military industrial system, especially the shipbuilding industry, which was devastated, which means that it has forever lost the strength and ability to build a global maritime hegemony. The most important thing is that now is no longer the era when the end of World War II is full of former colonies in the world, the world is irreversible, there are many regional powers, and even the United States is unable to maintain its hegemony, and it needs to rely more on regional allies and puppet servants supported in the past, not to mention Russia, which has long lost its original power

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Russia he will really become a world hegemon because of his tough military power.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It is unlikely to be right away, because the United States is developed in all respects, while Russia is mainly heavy industry, and the economy is not very developed. And without the United States, and many other countries, the world will change. China and Russia should continue to cooperate, but they will definitely check and balance each other, and countries such as France, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan are watching, so it is unlikely to become one immediately.

    Who can say for sure what will happen in many years' time.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Without the United States, Russia can certainly become the world hegemon, but China will counterbalance Russia.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Without the United States, neither China nor Russia is qualified to be world hegemons, and the per capita GDP of world hegemons must at least rank among the top 30 in the world. Even a developed country cannot reach it, and it is embarrassing to say that it is the second and third largest country in the world.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Without the United States, Russia is very likely to become a world hegemon, mainly because Russia's strength is also very strong.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Yes, and the world will be dark.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Without the United States, it is estimated that Russia may become a world hegemon, after all, their military strength is relatively strong.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Possibly, because the developed countries just want to be the hegemon.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Without the United States, it would be difficult for Russia to become a world hegemon.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Of course, it will not be Russia, it will inevitably be stronger in terms of comprehensive strength.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Without the United States, China might have become a vassal of the former Soviet Union.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    It should be Russia, because the Chinese are not nosy in their bones and do not want to be the boss.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Without the United States, China and Russia would fight each other, and the winner would be king.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    It is only known that if Russia is hegemonic, it is not known how much land will be voluntarily annexed to Russia.

Related questions
10 answers2024-07-20

The trend of the world is political multipolarity, economic globalization, and the hegemony of the United States is suppressed by many economies such as the European Union, the BRICS, and ASEAN, so the hegemony of the United States cannot last long.

29 answers2024-07-20

After all, he is the one who made the mistake in marriage, and the fact that he has been in so much love in such a short period of time after breaking up must give people a feeling that they are not in love.

4 answers2024-07-20

No, the first ** in the United States was George Washington, and Franklin was 32. >>>More

20 answers2024-07-20

The main reason for the low influence of football in the United States is that the three major professional leagues in North America: professional basketball, professional ice hockey and professional baseball have a long history, a high degree of professionalism, and mature business operations, which have long been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people in the United States. Therefore, football, as a latecomer, can only save the country by following the "national fitness route" curve of the United States. >>>More

10 answers2024-07-20

The U.S. dollar is the international currency and can be exchanged directly**. Formally speaking, only **, ** is the real currency, the US dollar and the RMB are just paper money, which has no value in itself, and performs monetary functions in the market instead of ****. Because the United States is economically strong and stable, politically superpowered, and is the leader of the Western world, it can control the financial economy of the West. >>>More