How difficult is it for farmers to farm? Why abandon the wasteland?

The best of all kinds of agricultural materials, and the food is not valuable, because everyone is divided into one acre and three points of land, so even if it is a desperate effort, hollowing out the management of the land, then in addition to investment, there is not much left in the end. And now is a high-consumption fast-paced social life, it is really difficult to move an inch away from money

It is difficult for farmers to farm the land, which will have a certain impact on crops due to a lot of extreme weather, and a large number of pests and diseases will lead to reduced crop yields, difficult to sell, and there are no channels, so they can't sell out, or they are sold very low, and farmers lose money. Many young people go to the city, and young people don't know how to farm, so they have to abandon the wasteland, the price of goods is skyrocketing, seeds and fertilizers need money, and the farmers have no choice, so they have to abandon the wasteland.

It is mainly affected by the environment, and the current environment is really not suitable for planting, which will reduce the grain yield a lot, and there will be landslides.

Farmers can abandon their land because they are not obliged to grow valuable food. Don't worry, and let me explain. <>

Many people have doubts about whether farming is a profession, and some people think that farming is a profession. But some people think that farmers are a class, just like white-collar workers, gold-collar workers. Personally, I think that farming can only be described as a profession.

Because people don't necessarily have to be farmers, they can also change jobs, and they can change jobs to white-collar workers.

First of all, let's talk about whether farmers have the obligation to plant. In my opinion, no, people can change jobs at any time, let alone obligations. Since it is said that being a farmer is a profession, since it is a profession, then you have to make money, and it is nothing if you just lose money or not!

Anyone who runs a cavity shop can close the shop and not do it, and the farmers can also pick and choose not to do it, which is very reasonable. Imposing the necessary crops on the peasants is undoubtedly hooliganism. It's as unreasonable as forcing a rich man to give money every year for free.

You must know that the low income and high cost of farmers are the primary reasons why they are most reluctant to plant. Only by changing this problem can we solve the problem of abandonment. According to the existing problem of abandonment, some agricultural experts have put forward three measures to change the situation, namely:

1. Increase subsidies for growing grain and increase farmers' income from growing grain; 2. The state invests in strengthening the basic construction of farmland, improving farmland yield and the function of ensuring income in drought and flood; 3. Moderately promote large-scale planting, reduce the cost of growing grain from all aspects, and increase the income of growing grain.

These three measures are nothing more than an increase in peasants' incomes from farming. Therefore, increasing income is the key to solving the problem of abandonment. It is believed that if these three points can be implemented, the problem of abandonment should be solved, and some farmers may even go to open up wasteland.

After all, with profits in front of you, it's hard not to be impressed. <>

Don't stand on your so-called moral high ground to ask farmers to plant, everyone doesn't want to lose money, why should farmers be asked to bear this loss. Therefore, the peasants have the right to abandon their fields, and they also have the right not to plant, which is their freedom.

No, because land is very valuable, and you can grow plants on it to feed yourself. No, because the income of farmers is really not high.

I don't think we should abandon the land, this is a waste of resources, although there is no righteous hail of growing food, but farmers should also take growing food as a responsibility. Talk.

I don't think so, if the peasants abandon the land and waste it, not only is the land wasted, but the peasants have nothing else to do.

As for the peasants, I think they should not abandon the land, and the peasants are not obliged to grow food, so the state should give encouraging policies.

Under the circumstance that no matter whether it is a city dweller or a peasant worker, three to five days' wages are worth the amount of land that the peasants have allocated throughout the year, and we should never expect the peasants to return to their hometowns to guard the land without going out to work. As for land abandonment, it is impossible for the departments concerned to fundamentally solve the problem if they do not conduct in-depth research and make practical policy adjustments. To tell the truth, there is not a single peasant who does not feel sorry for his soil and fully explains why he abandoned his fields and went out to work, and what are the reasons.

This is indeed a major matter related to the national economy and people's livelihood, and if we do not solve this problem at the root.

<>I think this phenomenon will continue until the real farmers are left without land. Of course, it may not be blind to this, but there must be a certain amount of time and space. This phenomenon is not solved immediately, and it cannot be seen immediately.

This phenomenon is not because food is the first factor in people's livelihood, and its price must be acceptable to the poorest people, otherwise people will starve to death. I don't think anything society subjectively wants.

The main reason for this is that the peasants have no income from labor and even lose money, so the peasants abandon the fields and do not plant them. Only when the phenomenon of peasants having labor and income for farming will be solved, and when will the peasants not abandon the wasteland and not plant. Starve people to death, not to mention a socialist society.

This is a rise in grain prices that cannot be raised, and because the country has not been able to do so for a long time, there are always more ways than difficulties. This phenomenon is based on the conditions of time, place, and people to establish the point of continuity. However, a survey shows that most of the female migrant workers are engaged in jobs such as confinement care, nursing, and cooking services, which are jobs that few people have engaged in in the past, such as factory enterprises and domestic servants.

In other words, part-time jobs have been transferred from factories and mines to private households, and jobs have entered the era. Why don't migrant workers go out to work? At present, it is the trend of the times for young and middle-aged peasants to go out to work, and it is the desire of the people.

In particular, there are professional people who are able to do so.

Personally, I think that if you want to attract farmers to go home to farm, you should give them enough economic income at this time, and if the economic income is in place, they will generally go home to farm.

If the income from farming is more than that of going out to work, no one wants to go out, with less land and less income, and they must go out to work if they still have to live.

In response to this phenomenon, higher subsidies can be given to rural areas, and farmers are called on to return to their villages to farm, and only when the subsidies are better, they will choose to come back to farm.

<> "When it comes to the problem of abandonment in the countryside, we don't want to poke this "sore spot", but when you see that spring plowing is supposed to be underway, patches of paddy fields or land are barren, and the fields are not ploughed, but thick weeds have grown, and even a lot of miscellaneous trees have grown on some fields. And the original outline of paddy fields and dry land cannot be distinguished. This shows that such land has been abandoned.

The abandonment of rural fields did not start now, but it has now reached a point where the problem of abandonment is very serious. Of course, we don't have detailed data on the messy limbs now, but as long as you go back to the countryside and find out for yourself, you can know how many people are still farming in their rural hometowns. As long as anyone understands it, they can see the seriousness of the problem of rural abandonment.

In fact, the question here comes, the peasants' lives are getting better and better, why is there more and more abandoned land in the countryside now? Let's talk about it briefly today:

First of all, we also talked about the peasants' lives getting better and better. Here we must understand that the improvement of the peasants' lives is not obtained by farming, but by the peasants who go out to work or do business, and earn it back by becoming their own bosses. In this case, there will be no time for the rural fields to take care of, so the wasteland will be abandoned.

Second, farmers are becoming more aware that it is impossible to make a fortune by growing grain. Not to mention that there is little land in one's own home, and the food ** is not better than ordinary water**, the annual food income is simply not enough for family expenses. And nowadays, building a house, buying a car, sky-high bride price, etc., all require money.

Have you ever heard that farming on your own can solve these problems? Therefore, farmers also understand that only by going out to work and earn money can the quality of life of their families be improved.

On the other hand, the countryside is slowly becoming "hollow villages", and the country is carrying out urbanization, that is, letting the peasants move to the cities, so that there will be fewer peasants in the countryside. Of course, it is not obvious to the peasant generation, especially the second or third generation of peasants, who have basically chosen to leave the countryside and settle down in the city. In this case, only the elderly are left in the countryside, and the elderly are simply unable to carry out high-intensity agricultural production and harvesting.

In this case, the abandonment of the fields will become more and more serious.

Of course, the problems that we can see are also seen by the people of the relevant functional departments of the state, and they are also actively thinking of ways to solve the problem of abandonment in rural areas.

Everyone has seen this year's No. 1 document. There is a talk about the problem of abandonment. In this way, the village cadres will be busy again, because all the implementation of policies needs to be implemented by the village cadres, to supervise, and so on.

**Document No. 1 clearly points out that it is necessary to increase the use of abandoned cultivated land. Guide the orderly circulation of land management rights, and develop moderately large-scale agricultural operations. Safeguard the lawful land rights and interests of farmers who have settled in urban areas, and encourage voluntary and compensated transfers in accordance with law.

This means that since the peasants do not want to farm the land, they can make good use of the abandoned land through circulation or paid transfer.

It is a well-established fact that land is not given up in large quantities, which does not mean that farmers can make money by farming. So why hasn't this land been abandoned? If the peasants can report to work and have work to do, I am afraid that the phenomenon of land waste will be very serious.

Judging from the actual situation in rural areas, the rural field labor force is basically farmers in their 60s. One of the main problems is that this part of the peasants cannot go or even find suitable jobs. Peasants depend on their labor for a living, they work without work, but they have to go home and farm, no matter how much, it is better than nothing.

Why can't farmers make money farming? We are not discussing whether farmers can feed their families on the soil core land. In agriculture, agricultural products have grown exponentially in recent years, while food has remained stable for many years.

Seeds, pesticides, and fertilizers are a few cents or even a few dollars per kilogram, while grains are a few cents per kilogram. A few yuan a pound of seeds has now risen to dozens of yuan, and some seeds are still counterfeit and shoddy, or fake seeds. The agricultural labor force has increased several times.

Ten years ago, that figure was $40 to $50 a day. Now it's $200 a day. The land is still the same land, the yield is still the same, such wages and agricultural products**, farmers make money by farming.

There is no room for discussion. It is not the peasants who lie. At present, this is not a question of whether agriculture is profitable or not.

The most important thing is how to solve the problem of high costs and low incomes, so that farmers can earn income from farming and make full use of their land to ensure food security. This is an issue that the Chinese people should be concerned about. If it really comes to the time when a large amount of land in Chuxiu is wasted, how can we solve our food problem, we will be strangled to death if we rely entirely on imports.

China is a country with a large population and little land, and everyone's life involves food. Agriculture can only be strengthened, not weakened. Agriculture is the foundation of the national economy, and the whole society should pay attention to the development of agriculture; without stable agriculture, there will be no rapid economic development, and it is the happiness of the people of the whole country to fill the weak links in agriculture as soon as possible, so that agriculture will be more stable and the peasants will have income.

We should stop talking about farmers and do something that is easy for us to talk about. It's the right thing to do for farmers to work peacefully to ensure our food security.

1.In terms of farming alone, agricultural materials have doubled over the years, and grain has been stable for many years, seeds, pesticides, and fertilizers have risen by a few dimes per catty, or even a few yuan, and the grain bridge has risen by a few cents per catty. A few yuan a pound of seeds, now the price has risen to dozens of yuan, and some seeds are still shoddy, or fake seeds.

The number of agricultural workers has doubled several times, and 10 years ago it cost 40 or 50 yuan per working day, but now it costs 200 yuan per working day. The land is still that piece of industrial land, the output is still that output, such wages and agricultural materials, what do farmers rely on to make money from farming.

2.Whether or not the peasants increase their output is a real issue, and there is no room for argument, still less is it that the peasants are panicking. At present, it is not a question of arguing whether farming is profitable, the most important thing is how to solve the problem of high cost and low income, so that farmers can make money from farming, let the land be fully utilized, and ensure food security, which is the problem that the Chinese people should be concerned about.

3.Agriculture is the foundation of the national economy, and the whole society should be concerned about the development of agriculture; without a stable agriculture, there will be no rapid development of the economy, and it is the happiness of the people of the whole country to make up for the shortcomings of agriculture as soon as possible, so that agriculture can be more solid and the peasants can have income. Stop talking about farmers, don't do things that don't hurt your back when you stand and talk, let farmers farm with peace of mind, and ensure our food security, which is the right thing.