What do the three best soldiers of World War II have in common?

Updated on society 2024-07-22
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    The three best soldiers of World War II all have very strong willpower, they are very brave in the face of war, and they can give up their lives for the honor of the country.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    The common denominator between them is: the first point is that they have the spirit of not being afraid of death. The second point is that their record is exaggerated. The third point is that they all suffer from insomnia, depression, and nightmares.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    All three soldiers were very strong, and even after the battle to the end, they did not flinch, and still held their positions.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Matthias Duheitenauer, who was the first in the Wehrmacht's record of sniper kills in World War II, recorded 345 hunts. He once said that the success of a sniper is not measured by how many people he shoots, but by how much impact he can have on the enemy. Snipers who can kill enemy officers are often able to thwart enemy attacks.

    In World War II, the Soviet army fully recognized the tactical value of snipers and promoted them. In the Battle of Stalingrad, Soviet snipers instilled great fear in the German troops and played an important role in demoralizing the German army. According to statistics, it took an average of 10,000 rounds of ammunition to kill a soldier during World War II.

    During the Vietnam War, an average of 200,000 rounds of ammunition were needed to kill a soldier, while an average sniper at the same time needed only 200,000 rounds of ammunition per soldier.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Upstairs were all pediatrics, the 44-86292 crew of the B29A bomber of the 509th Mixed Group of the US Army Air Corps, a total of 12 people, dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and killed 88,000 people on the spot, and by the end of the year, about 140,000 people had died.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The Second World War was an unprecedented catastrophe in the history of mankind, and it is unique in history in terms of the number of countries involved in the war, the great lethality and destructive power of the war, the huge human and material losses, and the profound impact on the current world pattern. World War 2 was the closest global war to today. The wars involving the largest number of countries and the intensity of the wars are the greatest, and the more people who die, the more important the wars should be remembered.

    It has been several generations since the Second World War, and there are still people who have experienced that war. There is nothing to say because the time is too close, and it will not be forgotten because the time is too far away, this kind of story that seems to be within reach, but there are many fogs, is the story that people are most interested in.

    If we look back at the First World War, we will find that at that time, the countries participating in the war were still superstitious about the defense system composed of trenches, barbed wire, pillboxes, mines, machine guns, and artillery. However, after the outbreak of World War II, the pattern of warfare changed significantly. Tank swarm assaults, enemy divisions and encirclement infantry follow-ups, and bomber volleys to deliver devastating strikes on ground targets have become the protagonists of warfare.

    The linear defense system is no longer an impregnable line of defense, and the confrontation between the two sides in World War I rarely occurs.

    Due to the rapid progress of equipment, the lethality and destructive power of equipment are even more amazing. World War II was far more devastating than World War I, and it was not uncommon for a city to be razed to the ground. During the Battle of Stalingrad during the Great Patriotic War, the entire city was almost completely destroyed.

    At one time, the Soviet and German armies were fighting on the ruins of the city, street by street, alley, and house by house. Aerial bombardment was particularly lethal and limited to the fact that precision guidance had not yet appeared**, so in order to destroy a single target, it was often necessary to carry out indiscriminate bombing with large numbers of bombs.

    Moreover, since the Gulf War, modern warfare has been too high-tech to be as interesting as World War II. World War II was a grand scale, the two sides were evenly matched, and famous generals emerged, and there were many wonders. The distance is close and the information is sufficient, providing infinite reverie for military fans.

    It can be said that it is the last collision of steel and will. The prelude to modern warfare, after the Korean War, there were no more large-scale trenches, large-scale charges. World War II is a farewell to an era and ushered in a new generation.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    World War II was the largest war in human history, and it also invented many interesting weapons of war.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    World War II was the first truly modern three-dimensional war. Before World War II, the use of airplanes for reconnaissance and tanks was only in its infancy. The Second World War was also the largest, and many of the countries considered militarily powerful were vulnerable and worth studying.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Many of the advanced ** made their debut in World War II. Military fans like it because of its long duration and relatively complete records.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    In World War II, the strongest individual combat effectiveness of soldiers was the Japanese soldiers, because they were all proficient in bushido, and basically one person could fight several Chinese soldiers in white-knuckle combat, and their shooting ability was also good.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It should be Germany, in terms of personal quality, the training of ordinary soldiers in the German army is very strict, the discipline is very strict, and the personal quality is comparable to that of soldiers from other countries, and the innate physical fitness of the Germans is also very good, they pay great attention to the collective, they are strong-willed, and in general, their individual combat effectiveness is also very strong.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Which period of World War II is already a hot ** period, but I still love you can't reach the peak of science and technology, so the role of the soldier is actually very large, he can control the ** equipment to attack the enemy, if you have to say what is the strongest soldier personally, I think it should be the brain.

  13. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It is Germany, and from war movies we can see that German soldiers in Europe are usually mighty and strong, well-equipped, and brave on the battlefield.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    It was the German army, during World War II, the strength of the Nazis was obvious to all, when Germany dealt with a country alone, those armies were beaten badly, and in the end it was because many countries united to defeat the German army.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Nazi Germany should be the strongest in individual combat. The Nazis were strong and experienced in fighting, and they were very tough after the baptism of war, and if it were not for the siege of many countries, the Nazis would have singled out any country, and it would have been a Nazi victory.

Related questions
17 answers2024-07-22

Christmas Eve truce.

This is a small episode in the Second World War, which took place on Christmas Eve 1944. >>>More

13 answers2024-07-22

The most direct ones are the Japanese devils, as well as Nazi Germany, and then Italy.

23 answers2024-07-22

Because there are many exams to go through. And the baptism of war. So it's more difficult.

17 answers2024-07-22

Beat it. But at a great cost. The United States can be stronger than Germany and Japan because of the huge scale of its industry. >>>More

10 answers2024-07-22

is particularly edible, this title is really a particularly bad title about the actor.