If the multiverse really exists, who is controlling it?

The existence of a thing has nothing to do with who controls it. For example, a wild fruit tree bears its own fruit. It's wild, is someone manipulating him?

Even if the multiverse exists, no one controls the universe, the universe should run naturally, and who can have such a great ability to control the multiverse.

If the multiverse really exists, it should not be a matter of manipulation, but just a naturally formed phenomenon, and it is not surprising that there are many such phenomena in the universe, and we humans simply know too little about the universe.

With the continuous development of the Internet, people's reception of information has also improved to varying degrees. Just turn on the internet at home and receive new knowledge from all over the world. Everyone's circle of friends, and even the friends around them, are talking about a new topic, and it's called the metaverse.

But although we know very little about it, and we're not very familiar with it yet, every industry is talking about the metaverse, and there are some opportunists who profit from it as well.

In the midst of the recent chaos, the people have also made a number of comments, the most memorable of which is that although the metaverse has many possibilities and room for future development, it is only a new thing that has not yet taken shape. The ultimate meaning of this phrase is that although the metaverse is very popular and there is still a lot of room for development in the future, real commercial companies cannot have an absolute say in the metaverse. Some of the hype about the cosmic metaverse is just an explanation of some basic concepts of the metaverse.

The popularity of the concept of the "universe" shows that technology is constantly advancing. However, we still have a lot of work to do in the meantime, such as, what is the metaverse and what areas can it be applied to? A series of questions, such as what role people will play in the future, are unknown.

This is not just an exploration by some Internet companies, but also needs to be studied by scientists. For the average person, there is nothing wrong with paying attention to the metaverse, but don't indulge in it and be taken advantage of by some opportunists.

In the face of the metaverse, it is not so much about indulgence as it is about rationality. In today's online environment, people are becoming more and more able to accept information, but it is difficult to distinguish the authenticity of information. Therefore, the metaverse has become so popular recently, but I believe that with the emergence of some professional articles or **, users will definitely have a deeper understanding of the concept of "source universe".

It should be viewed correctly, and this is also a thing that many young people like very much recently, and I like this element very much, and there will be a very good social system and ecosystem.

The concept of the metaverse is not a fantasy. With the continuous progress of science and technology, our life will become more and more technological and convenient. Believe that the metaverse is achievable.

The metaverse is only a concept so far, but it is a concept worth investing in, otherwise the bigwigs from all walks of life would not have started throwing money into it.

Unknown and exploration, as well as awe, after all, the power of the metaverse is still something that scientists cannot specifically estimate for the time being.

I think it's good to look at it with a normal heart, after all, the metaverse is just a virtual thing, and no one knows what will happen to its development in the future.

War or invasion, even if there will be space and resource competition in the same universe, if there is a multiverse, then the competition for living space and resources, as well as the ambition of the ruler, will lead to the outbreak of war.

If the multiverse really exists, it will happen that we are here and suddenly travel to another plane.

Is multiverseism a scientific theory? In my personal opinion, if people want to understand this topic accurately, they must first understand the process and development of human understanding of the concept of the universe before they can make a correct judgment. Why do you say that?

Because the process of human understanding of the concept of the universe is divided into two stages. The primitive stage of visual observation, the modern stage of scientific and technological observation. Let's talk about the primitive stage of visual observation.

Ever since the advent of intelligent humans, they have been curious about the secrets of objectively existing stars in the universe. This is not a bad thing for the emergence of generations of observers and explorers who have been full of curiosity and interest.

They can only observe the existence of space through the visual range of their eyes, and find that there are regularities in the movement of stars in the solar system. Human astronomy can only sprout in this hazy observation, and with the discovery of the basic phenomena of the movement of stars in the solar system, the spatial extent of the solar system observed by the naked eye is called the universe, that is, the cognitive range of the original intention of the concept of the universe in early astronomy refers to the spatial extent of the solar system. In other words, the first human understanding of the concept of the universe was that the solar system (or star system) was a separate cosmic space.

Based on this concept, scientists later proposed that the multiverse theory is a scientific theory.

At the heart of this theory is the idea that the small universes of star systems together make up an infinite universe. Let's talk about the current state of science and technology observation. In the past 100 years, with the rapid development of science and technology, mankind has continuously invented various space observation and telescope tools, which has greatly expanded the space vision of astronomers and gained a new understanding of the concept of the universe.

The latest concept of the universe suggests that the universe is a natural celestial body with infinite space and infinite matter, made up of countless stars and their star systems, the infinite cycle of stars and stars is established by the universe, and the infinite cycle of stars and stars can be formed together, just like the infinite cycle of stars in the universe.

From the point of view of this modern developed view of the universe, the universe contains everything in space. It is an infinite space concept, unique. Using this principle to judge whether the multiverse theory is scientific or not is, of course, untenable.

However, if the condition is still to see the constant Milky Way (solar system) as a small universe in its own right, and infinite natural space as a large universe, then the theory of multiple cosmology is valid. In other words, the big universe is made up of an infinite number of small universes (galaxies).

The multiverse itself is not a scientific theory. Rather, it is a theoretical corollary of the laws of physics that are accepted by humanity today. The multiverse may even be an inevitable consequence of these laws:

An inflationary universe governed by quantum physics will almost certainly get multiverses. But, like string theory, it has some unexplainable problems: it can't be anything we've observed, and it can't be anything definite that we can go looking for.

It's not a scientific theory. It's just a virtual world, and it's also a virtual world created with technological equipment.

Observing the universe is only a small part of the universe we live in. The observable diameter of the universe is about 92 billion light-years. Our single universe is different by the theory** as a diameter of 156 billion light years, 10 10 122 Pa seconds, infinite.

There are multiple universes beyond a single universe: the quantum many-world theory, eternal expansion, the ultimate mathematical universe, the virtual world, the modal logic possible world, and the collective universe. The possibilities are endless.

However, according to the current scientific and technological theories of mankind, the observable universe is unobservable, unrelated, unknowable, and cannot be verified and falsified.

<> scientists measured the radius of the observable universe by measuring the redshift of photons on the background photons of the cosmic microwaves, and obtained the distance of movement, which is about 46.5 billion light-years. What is the cosmic microwave background radiation? What does it stand for?

It's actually the afterglow of the big **, the first ray of light that travels through space, before the photons form, so we can't go any further. That is, the CMB is like a barrier – a space-time barrier – that imprisons us within the immense confines of the human-observable universe.

The basic principles of the universe tell us that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic on a large scale. To put it bluntly, it is the same in all directions when viewed from all over the universe. Imagine that there is a group of aliens from tens of billions of light-years away who are also observing the universe, and under the same technical conditions, the universe seen is the same as that of us humans, if I don't understand it at first glance, I might as well think again, if you sit in a small boat and drift in the depths of the ocean, and no matter which direction you look at the sea, it's the same, right?

Similarly, if I follow your example, we can see the sea in all directions as long as we are far enough apart. So it's all the same.

Except that the universe looks three-dimensional, the ocean looks two-dimensional. You may ask, where did this seemingly identical ocean come from? In other words, how did the observable universe as seen by different observers come about?

But it comes from the big **. And because of the accelerated expansion of the universe, it has evolved to such a huge, unfathomable scale! That's why we want to see it as part of the universe.

What's going on with the accelerating expansion of the universe? In other words, the structure of the universe itself is also evolving at an accelerated pace. Of course, large-scale space-time structures, or at least galaxies moving away from each other.

It can be observed, because the current scientific research and technology and aerospace development are very advanced. Scientists can detect the multiverse beyond the universe after continuous testing, and according to the current AI technology, the existence of multiple characters has been set up.

I don't think there is a multiverse. Because this multiverse only exists in comics and people's imaginations, such a universe cannot really exist.

Humanity has only explored a small part of the universe. Because the universe is very big, people know very little about the universe.