Why does M rquez s Love in the Time of Cholera surpass One Hundred Years of Solitude ?

Love in the time of cholera.

and One Hundred Years of Solitude are two very classic and very good books, and I think the main reasons why love in the cholera period surpasses one hundred years of solitude are as follows.

Second, on the surface, it is love, but in fact it is a difference in social rank, it is because the social status of the male protagonist is relatively low, and the heroine's father is not willing to marry his daughter to him at all, so there is love during the cholera period.

Third, there are a lot of social states written in it, and you can find out what kind of society was it at that time? How bad the living environment of the people is, and how relentless the struggle for survival is.

I think the main reasons why love during the cholera period surpasses a hundred years of loneliness are the following points: first, the love during the cholera period is ostensibly written love, but in fact, there are more people behind it, the living state of this life, the living state of the two protagonists and the state of society second, on the surface, it is love, but in fact it is a difference in social hierarchy, it is because the social status of the hero is relatively low, and the heroine's father is not willing to marry his daughter to him at all, so the love during the cholera period is third, There are a lot of social states written in it, and you can find out, what was the state of society at that time? How bad the living environment of the people is, and the unremitting struggle for survival Well, so the love during the time of Marquez's cholera, in fact, this book is a little better.

Márquez's "Love in the Time of Cholera" surpasses "One Hundred Years of Solitude" because "Love in the Time of Cholera" is more resonant with people and makes people's hearts feel particularly warm.

If Marquez's love during the cholera period.

Beyond a hundred years of solitude.

I think these are all writers, and the literary world has its own opinions.

Each has its own ability to judge.

For this, two masterpieces.

In fact, the benevolent see the benevolent, and the wise see the wise.

There is no unanimous conclusion, nor is it possible.

Generalize, so it's all good**.

It seems that some authors prefer which work?

This is widely recognized.

Because the plot of Márquez's "Love in the Time of Cholera" is more fascinating and colorful, it can resonate, so it will surpass "One Hundred Years of Solitude".

In the world literary circle, Márquez's "One Hundred Years of Solitude" is very popular and influential, and many writers we know today, such as Mo Yan and Yu Hua, have also been deeply influenced by this book. Although everyone says it's good, the more you can't read it, the more people feel that it's profound, the more you feel good, continuous long sentences, strange narrative methods, are Marquez's writing characteristics, most of the people who first came into contact with "One Hundred Years of Solitude" will mistakenly think that Marquez is this style, but in fact, Marquez also has many understandable **, Marquez's other novel**"Love in the Time of Cholera", this** is still full of Marquez's personal writing characteristics, but the whole story is very easy to understand.

"Love in the Time of Cholera" tells a love story that spans more than half a century, and its content is not inferior to "One Hundred Years of Solitude", and in this **, the relationship between the characters is not so cumbersome and complicated. To put it simply, because it depicts love, the main characters are naturally two men and women, and all other characters revolve around the hero and heroine.

If "One Hundred Years of Solitude" describes the tragic epic of a family, then "Love in the Time of Cholera" is completely a love epic, and therefore, some people will say that the love of the hero and heroine is the love of the century, and "Love in the Time of Cholera" is an encyclopedia of love. But unfortunately, although "Love in the Time of Cholera" is a very wonderful ** and can be read at the same time, its influence is not as good as "One Hundred Years of Solitude", and many of its colors are drowned out by people's pursuit of "One Hundred Years of Solitude".

Although the storyline of Love in the Time of Cholera is easy to understand, the sentences in the book are very different from the language we live in, so when you read the book for the first time, it will definitely not be so fluent.

The biggest impression and shock is not the first sentence in "One Hundred Years of Solitude", but the last part of the book. The captain asked Florentino Arisa how long it would take for them to go back and forth on the canal like this, and for 53 years, 7 months and 11 days, Florentino Arisa had always had the answer, "All my life."

I think what he wants to express is that a very free view of love and spiritual dependence are vividly interpreted with the joys and sorrows of the past fifty years.

What this ** wants to express is that no matter what situation you encounter, love will always exist, and true love will never change.

Love in the Time of Cholera is a novel by Colombian writer García Márquez, first published in 1985.

The ** tells a love story that spans more than half a century: the hero and heroine fail to marry at the age of twenty because they are too young; After all the twists and turns of life, at the age of eighty, they still couldn't get married because they were too old. In a span of fifty years, the author shows all the possibilities of love, all the ways of love.

This ** not only expresses "it is a dignity to experience the torture of love", but more importantly, it shows the history of Colombia. War and cholera threaten the lives of Latin American people, while man-made destruction has exacerbated the antagonism between man and nature, and people's social loneliness has led to a lack of understanding and trust between people, and the psychological distance between people has increased.