Macro vs Micro, which is better? Is there a difference between micro and macro?

From the microcosm to the macrocosm, the intuitive comparison of the size of the universe, the earth is really too small in it, the sun is inconspicuous in it, and some celestial bodies are unimaginably huge, which is simply unimaginable.

As the name suggests, macro refers to looking at the big picture, and micro refers to looking at the small side. In the fields of religion, sociology, and economics, the concept of Madhyamaka is often used, that is, between the macro and the micro. In the field of natural sciences, mesoscopic is a concept that sits somewhere between the macro and the micro.

In the natural sciences, the microcosm usually refers to the material world at the level of molecules, atoms, and other particles, while the material world other than the microcosm is called the macrocosm. In the natural sciences, there is also the concept of meso, which is a system between the macro and the micro. The object in the mesoscope is already macroscopic in size, so it has the characteristics of a macroscopic system; However, due to the coherence of the electron motion, a series of new interference phenomena related to the quantum mechanical phase will appear, which is similar to the microscopic system, so it is called "mesoscopic".

In the social sciences, generally speaking, we usually call the science that studies and grasps the big picture and the overall aspect as macro science, and this kind of research method is called the macro method. The science that is studied and grasped from small and local aspects is usually called microscience, and this research method is called microscopic method. For example, the science that studies the laws of the overall development of a certain society is called macro-sociology; The science that studies a special phenomenon or a local phenomenon in a certain society is called microsociology.

Another example is the science that studies the laws of economic development as a whole, which we call macroeconomics; The science of studying a certain economic phenomenon at a local level is called microeconomics. In the fields of religion, sociology, economics, etc., there is also the concept of Madhyamaka. Although the nouns are the same, the definitions are different in different fields.

The macro and micro are interconnected and mutually influential, and without the macro, there is no micro; Vice versa. The philosophical category is full of such contradictions, such as the whole and the part, the quality and the quantity, the existence and the mind, and so on. If we want to grasp the overall situation at the macro level, we must discard the influence of the micro level, for example, macroeconomic regulation and control.

If it represents the interests of the micro, then it will naturally continue to enlarge the proportion of the micro, so as to achieve the purpose of influencing the macro and obeying the micro. The macro is built on the micro, is the product of the accumulation of the micro to a certain extent, and from the whole and part, the macro is the collection of the micro. The two are unified, micro and macro are just one angle, and micro influence will restrict macro development.

Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the problem holistically. [Collapse].

I didn't dare, so I refused, and then they all scolded me and said that I was shameless and let others say it.

The main differences between the two are as follows:

1) The subjects of the study are different. The microscopic object of study is the individual. The macro object of study is the whole.

2) The problems solved are different. At the micro level, we need to solve the problem of resource allocation, that is, what to produce, how to produce and for whom, so as to maximize individual benefits. Macro takes resource allocation as an established premise and studies the use of resources within the scope of society in order to maximize social welfare.

3) Different research methods. The micro method of research is quantitative analysis. The macro research method is aggregate analysis.

4) The underlying assumptions are different. The basic assumption of the micro level is that the market is clear, completely rational and fully informed, and that the "invisible hand" can freely adjust to achieve the optimal allocation of resources. Macro, on the other hand, assumes that the market mechanism is imperfect, and corrects the defects of the market mechanism through a "visible hand".

5) The central theory and basic content are of course also different. In the social sciences, generally speaking, we usually refer to the science that studies and grasps from the big picture and the overall aspect as macro science, and this research method is called the macro belt method. Usually the science that studies and grasps from small aspects and local aspects is called microscience, and this research method is called microscopic method.

The microscopic abyss is the macrocosm, and the macroscopic abyss is the microcosm. The microscopic limit large convergence constitutes the extended universe, the macroscopic limit small convergence constitutes the curled up universe, and the extended universe and the curled up universe constitute the entire universe. Expand, curl up as a definition, not a directional action word, can be defined as expand to curl up, curl up as an extension.

Macro is to look at the material itself from the perspective of the big picture, such as social contribution and social value, and micro is to look at the material itself from the perspective of material details, such as the butterfly effect of the material itself because the material itself will lead to something.

Hello, the differences between the two are as follows:1The object of study is different, and the object of study at the micro level is a single one.

The macro object of study is the whole. Micro is both about types and numbers, and it is the fundamental of macro. Molecules, atoms, ions, etc., are microscopic.

Macrocosm only talks about the types regardless of the number, its meaning is derived from the microcosm, and the matter and elements are macrocosm. 2.The research method is different, and the micro research method is a quantitative analysis.

The macro research method is aggregate analysis. 3.The problems to be solved are different, and the micro problem to be solved is the problem of resource allocation; Macro, on the other hand, takes the allocation of resources as an established premise and studies the use of resources within the scope of society.

4.Macroscopic does not involve internal junctions such as molecules, atoms, electrons, etc. A noun in physics of macroscopic structures or mechanisms (as opposed to microscopic).

Objects that can be seen with the naked eye are macroscopic objects; The microscopic is the opposite of the "macroscopic" and includes molecules, atoms, nuclei, elementary particles, and their corresponding fields. Elementary particles also have their internal structure. All levels of the microcosm have wave-particle duality and obey the laws of quantum mechanics.

Macro is a big picture and big problem, such as strategic issues and overall problems, while micro is a tactical problem or a local problem, with different emphasis.

1. Different organizational elements:

1. The macrocosm is the composition of the elements and matter (regardless of the number, nor can the name of the substance), for example, the molecule is composed of atoms.

2. Microscopy is specific to the composition of a certain substance, such as what molecule, atom or ion is used (it can be said that the number can be said, or the name of the substance, for example, 1 water molecule is composed of 2 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom.

Second, the scope is different:

1. Macro is a large-scale description of the relevant classes of the chemical shelter middle school.

2. Microscopic is a small-scale chemical description.

The word "chemistry" literally means "the science of change".

Chemistry is a natural science that studies the composition, structure, properties, and changes of matter at the atomic level, which is also the core basis of chemical change.

There are five sub-disciplines under modern chemistry: inorganic chemistry, organic chemistry, physical chemistry, analytical chemistry and polymer chemistry.