What is the connection between the universe and nature? Is the universe part of nature, or is nature

Nature has two meanings: nature in a broad sense refers to all beings with infinite diversity, which is synonymous with the categories of universe, matter, existence, and objective reality; Nature in the narrow sense refers to the material world, or the natural world, which is distinct from human society. It is the sum of various material systems and is usually divided into two categories: non-living systems and living systems.

Non-living systems include elementary particles.

Or. quantum fields), atoms, molecules, up to various celestial bodies, and so on. Modern natural science has shown that the various structures, properties, and laws of motion of non-living systems are caused by gravity.

Electromagnetic, weak, and strong four interactions are determined. Living systems include aggregates (microspheres), cells, plants, animals, and up to the human body. Not only is it highly organized, but it also has a metabolism and self-replication.

capacity. The various material systems of nature are universally connected and constantly evolving, exhibiting a rich and colorful nature.

Nature in a broad sense includes human society. The latter was developed from nature. Human beings interact with the natural world in the process of production and labor, and with the development of production practice and science and technology, the face of the natural world is changing to an increasing extent.

This part of nature, which has been altered by human activities, is the materialization of human social labor, often referred to as "second nature".

or "humanizing nature".

The universe is a noun that refers to the space in which we exist, which can basically be defined as infinite. And its continuous evolution can be said to be natural. The nature of the earth is only a natural part of the universe. Personal knowledge accumulated comments, not perfect enough, forgive me, thank you.

1. Expansion of the universe: The whole universe is constantly expanding, and the separation movement of galaxies from each other is also part of the expansion, not due to the effect of any repulsion of chain reliability;

2. The law of gravitation: a law of interaction between good bodies, discovered by Newton in 1687. There is a mutual attraction between any objects, and the magnitude of this force is directly proportional to the mass of the individual objects, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the springs and leads;

3. Celestial evolution: Celestial bodies in the universe have a process of generation, development and decay. Astroevolution is one of the fundamental natural sciences.

1. Expansion of the universe: the whole universe is constantly expanding, and the separation movement of galaxies from each other is also part of the expansion, not due to any repulsive force;

2. The law of gravitation: a law of interaction between objects, discovered by Newton in 1687. There is a mutual attraction between all objects, and the magnitude of this force is directly proportional to the mass of each object, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the objects;

3. Celestial evolution: Celestial bodies in the universe have a process of generation, development and decay. Astroevolution is one of the fundamental natural sciences.

1. Expansion of the universe: The whole universe is constantly expanding, and the separation movement of galaxies from each other is also part of the expansion, not due to any repulsive force;

2. The law of gravitation: a law of interaction between objects, discovered by Newton in 1687. There is a mutual attraction between any objects, and the magnitude of this force is directly proportional to the mass of each object, and inversely proportional to the horizontal side of the distance between the objects;

3. Celestial evolution: Celestial bodies in the universe have a process of generation, development and decay. Astroevolution is one of the fundamental natural sciences.

Nature and the natural world are synonymous, the natural world refers to the inorganic world and the organic world, and is a classification of the material, energy, and information of the "free nature" that has not been given by human beings.

Some modern people also count "human society" in it, but it is not a problem to classify the "brain" as nature, the problem is that the "spirit" contained in the brain is not material; Nor is it energy; There is no place for a special "being" that is not information before externalization. If this "existence" is also counted as nature, there is no end to such nature.

Is the universe in your "being"? That is, do you say that the universe is nature?

The universe originated from the "singularity" of the big **. Where does the "singularity" come from? Scientifically and empirically unknown, and at this stage it can only be imagined. I imagine the "singularity" to be the energy accumulation state in which all matter becomes energy – "nothing".

The universe has boundaries, and the complexity of the universe is man.

Chaos is the monistic essence of the universe, and matter, energy, and information are the three "sub-elements" that human beings can discern. Through physical evolution, chemical evolution, and biological evolution, a natural primary structure has been formed, and human evolution, humanized natural (social) evolution, and spiritual culture have formed a natural secondary structure. Consciousness and thinking are the joints of the two structures, and man is the unity of the two structures.

The relationship between man and nature, the relationship between man and humanized nature, and the relationship between man and spiritual culture show the three-dimensional structure of a clear human system centered on human beings.

It's you? Did you ask our team for help?

We are telescope experts, not cosmic experts... You kid, in the middle of the night, are you asking for help!

But your question reminds me of some of my previous thoughts. That is: Is it because we think objectively out of the universe?

Or – the universe in which we exist makes us think like this?

Even: even if we can prove that we are thinking objectively, are we still unable to explain that we are out of the universe or that we are above the universe?

To put it another way, perhaps, our thinking, our feelings, are nothing more than the feelings of the universe.

Our relationship with the universe is like the body and the brain, we are at the top, the brain, but this brain sometimes hallucinates and detaches itself from the universe and thinks that it is

I remembered a passage from a TV series, which was boring and talked about zombies, but I felt that this passage was very philosophical: zombies to living people: I have no heartbeat, no brain waves, what do you think I live on?

I rely on magic!

Not convinced? In fact, you humans live by magic! It's just a different kind of magic than us! You shouldn't have forgotten the miracle nature of life by knowing simple terms like "carbohydrates", "energy" and "biochemistry"!

Newton and Einstein eventually believed in God. So, perhaps the end of science is philosophy, theology.

Faith is only the consciousness of man, but man himself is also a part of nature.

Nature is "natural" and "natural", who else do you want him to belong to? You are so attached to your imagination that the "who" you are talking about is nothing but a product of your consciousness, how dare you let it be above nature!

In the eyes of scientists, there are no endless beliefs, there are just constant observations and hypotheses, which are then confirmed. Otherwise, it's cranky.

Everything has to be provable.