What are the consequences of the blacklist of untrustworthy persons, and what is the impact of the b

The blacklist of untrustworthy persons refers to situations in which individuals, enterprises, or organizations are entered into the list for violations of credit pledges, breach of contract, debt evasion, and other such conduct. After being included in the blacklist of dishonest people, there will be the following consequences:

1. Damaged credit: The untrustworthy person will be spurned and pressured by the society, and the trust with partners, such as banks, financial institutions, and enterprises will be reduced, and the credit evaluation will be reduced, which will lead to the reduction of the credit limit or the rejection of the loan application.

2. Difficulty in obtaining loans: Banks and other financial institutions often conduct credit reviews during the loan application process, and once the applicant is found to be in the blacklist of dishonest persons, they will be strictly reviewed, which increases the difficulty of the loan.

3. Restriction of consumption: In some cases, the dishonest person may be restricted from purchasing high-end consumer goods, traveling, riding a flying motor, etc., in order to increase the punishment for breach of contract.

4. Legal proceedings: The dishonest person may face legal proceedings and enforcement procedures, including debt recovery, property seizure and freezing, etc., and may even be subject to compulsory measures by the court.

5. Damage to social reputation: The personal and corporate image of the dishonest person will be damaged, which may have a profound impact on his life and career.

To sum up, being blacklisted as a dishonest person will have a serious impact on all aspects of an individual or business, so we should value our credit, abide by the contract, and fulfill our commitments. If your loan application is rejected, it is recommended to check your credit status through the "Shell Tip Quick Check" first. If you have poor credit, it is advisable to wait until your credit risk score has decreased and the stain has been removed before trying to apply for a loan, which will have a higher chance of getting through.

1. What is the impact of the blacklist of untrustworthy persons?

1. The impact of the blacklist of untrustworthy persons is as follows:

1) Banks and other financial institutions restrict the loans, financing, and other financial activities of judgment defaulters included in the list of judgment defaulters, reduce credit card limits, and promptly report their deposits to the court through the judicial inquiry platform;

2) The departments for industry and commerce are to lower the credit rating of judgment defaulters, restricting their qualifications for trustworthy and contract-honoring evaluations;

3) Restrict judgment defaulters from leaving the country, the railway department will not give them ** train tickets, and the civil aviation department will not give them ** air tickets;

4) The departments for the management of tendering and bidding restrict judgment defaulters from participating in procurement and bidding for engineering projects.

2. Legal basis: Article 9 of the "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters".

Where citizens, legal persons, or other organizations that should not be included in the Judgment Defaulters List are included in the Judgment Defaulters List, the people's courts shall revoke the information on untrustworthiness within 3 working days.

Where the information on untrustworthiness recorded or published is inaccurate, the people's courts shall correct the information on untrustworthiness within 3 working days.

II. What are the circumstances of the judgment defaulter's conduct?

1. Obstructing or resisting enforcement by means such as fabricating evidence, violence, or threats;

2. Evading enforcement by means of false litigation, false arbitration, or concealment or transfer of property;

3. Violating the property reporting system;

4. Violating the order restricting high consumption;

5. The person subject to enforcement refuses to perform the enforcement settlement agreement without justifiable reasons;

6. Other refusals to perform obligations set forth in effective legal documents despite having the ability to perform.

First, the court will take various property investigation measures to freeze the parties' bank accounts, including online virtual transaction accounts such as Alipay and WeChat Pay, according to the application. Second, limit the high consumption of rubber skin. Third, the children of untrustworthy persons cannot attend key private schools.

Legal Analysis: Actions that can be taken against judgment defaulters:

The first is to prohibit some high-consumption behaviors, including prohibiting taking planes and train sleepers;

The second is to implement other credit punishments, including restricting loans or credit cards from financial institutions;

Third, where judgment defaulters are natural persons, they must not serve as the enterprise's legal representatives, directors, supervisors, senior managers, and so forth.

Legal basis: Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Publication of Information on the List of Judgment Defaulters

Article 7: All levels of people's court shall enter information on the Judgment Defaulters List into the Supreme People's Court's Judgment Defaulters List, and uniformly release it to the public through that list.

All levels of people's court may, on the basis of the actual conditions of each region, publish the list of judgment defaulters through other means such as newspapers, radio, television, the internet, and court bulletin boards, and may employ press conferences or other methods to periodically announce to the public the implementation of the judgment defaulters list system by that court and the courts in their jurisdiction.

Article 8: The people's courts shall report the information on the Judgment Defaulters List to relevant departments, financial regulatory agencies, financial institutions, public institutions undertaking administrative functions, industry associations, and so forth, for relevant units to give credit punishments to judgment defaulters in areas such as procurement, bidding and bidding, administrative approvals, support, financing and credit, market access, and qualification determinations in accordance with laws, regulations, and relevant provisions.