The Lord of the Rings plagiarized China s Journey to the West , do you agree?

EG A:

The authors are different, the authors are of different nationalities, the authors are different, the authors are different, the authors are different, the above 5 articles.

Broadly speaking, it is a classic work from different cultures of the East and the West.

Personally, I divide them into magic and myth.

There's no need to compare them, they all have their own characteristics and different backgrounds, and I like them all.

The Lord of the Rings is also a myth in nature, at least that's what the old man himself thinks, but I personally think it's a fable

What are the differences??? I don't think they have anything in common.

Jay Chou also heavily plagiarized the Japanese anime initial text d>......

I'll spray this sentence, people obviously wrote a remake, and you insist that they are plagiarizing ......

otl……Would you say that "Hua Jun" is a plagiarism of "Secretly Loving You"?

There are eighty percent of the plot colossus that will not, the big ear Tutu and the crayon small new plot. I will always support Crayon Shin-chan!

It's not that there are no good works.,It's just that those leaders don't let it go.,Landlord, you should really take a good look at what the problem of Chinese animation is.,Instead of killing a boatload of people with this stick.。

The twin princesses are so beautiful! But my classmates think it's domestic.,Or I'm more senior.,Because I like anime very much.,It's not that I don't support domestic production.,But the Japanese animation industry is developed.,There's too much animation.,It's also possible that it was a coincidence.,You take a closer look at the comics.,The comics are very good!

Jay? Plagiarized initial D? What else is your own movie???

Sky. 1.Jay's own movies only have secrets that can't be told 2The initial D is not a screenwriter made by Jay.

3.The initial D was originally taken in the original form of Japanese comics, and it was written very clearly! How can it be plagiarized?

4.I'm speechless for you.

Chinese cartoons are either terrible or plagiarized!

Jay Chou also heavily plagiarized the Japanese anime initial text d>......LZ misunderstood, it's not plagiarism, it's a remake!

In the past, Chinese animation felt classic, full of Chinese style, and evocative, but now, Chinese animation is made for a group of children under the age of 6.

The product of boredom plagiarism, imitation is almost all in it!

I remember one day when I was studying by myself, someone said that the red cat and the blue rabbit were artificially a violent animation. I'm just a little speechless, I just don't know how to say I'm a complete anime fan, and people are looking at me almost through the eyes of aliens!

My sister in her 20s watched the introduction of an anime (it seems to be a hell girl) and was surprised to say how could that be an anime, violence! Bloody! Complete 18 limit!

Many Chinese animation and talents have been turned away, and those old-fashioned people in China are unwilling to really understand the importance of animation and don't pay attention to it! Think that he is just naïve, the ignorance of animation by the Chinese!

Such Chinese animation, I don't know when I will see real Chinese animation! Created in China!

Damn, please, the "Dragon Lance" series was only published in 1984, and "The Lord of the Rings" was already popular in 1954-1955, so it should be the Dragon Lance plagiarism of the Lord of the Rings!!

A pirated version called "Harry Potter and the Tyrannical Dragon", published the year before the Order of the Phoenix, is purely a copy, and there are even word for word in several episodes, presumably about several protagonists who are cursed by acid rain and become dwarves, which means Habit, and then Voldemort and his brother Tyrannosaurus are Saruman and Sauron......

I just want to say that "The Magic of Luo Ling" plagiarized "Harry Potter", and Harry Potter will never plagiarize other literary works, otherwise how could it be so popular?

It's The Chronicles of Narnia. "The Lord of the Rings" is a movie, "The Lord of the Rings" is **, "The Lord of the Rings" is based on "The Lord of the Rings", "The Lord of the Rings" and "The Chronicles of Narnia" were written in a teahouse, and their authors are good friends, so they can't be called "plagiarism".

And the author of "Harry Potter" has seven books based on "The Chronicles of Narnia", so he only wrote seven books, which cannot be considered "plagiarism".

There's nothing to say, in short, I don't think Harry Potter is plagiarized, and a plagiarized work can't be popular until now

No way!!!

How can Harry Potter be plagiarism?

Landlord, don't insult him, okay?

I don't care about Lord of the Rings Anyway, Harry Potter wasn't copied.

What evidence do you have that this was copied?

Don't talk nonsense without evidence.

Thousands of fans will be angry.

If you write an article, say you copied it.

Do you feel good?

If you copy the dictionary, every word on the two parts can be found in the dictionary!

When pigs fly!!! The Lord of the Rings is a pioneering work, and later works have borrowed from it!!

Of course, Harry Potter will also borrow, but it is by no means plagiarism.

What kind of joke is the landlord making, The Lord of the Rings is the originator of Western-style mainstream fantasy, do you know what the originator is? The Lord of the Rings plagiarized, and other fantasy ** have borrowed from it.

Harry Potter also does not have "plagiarism", I also think that Europe and the United States have such strict protection of copyright, if there is a literary work plagiarism, the plagiarist has already been sentenced to prison, and it will not be like the Guo Jingming incident in my country.

As for the dragon gun upstairs, please, don't think that the Chinese translation of the dragon gun is earlier than the Lord of the Rings and thinks that the original book came out, I'll give you a chronology.

In 1949, the Lord of the Rings trilogy was completed.

From 1954 to 1955, the Lord of the Rings trilogy was released successively.

In 1984, the first dragon lance** - "Dragon Lance Chronicles: The Dragon of Autumn Twilight" was published.

It seems to be, the kingdom of Niana.

Since it is the originator, many works will be "borrowed"! Not a copy!

These two words cannot be equated.

Not counted. While the work adopts elements from "Journey to the West" in the initial stage, the idea of "collecting beads" is borrowed from the work "Nan Sui Li See the Eight Dogs", but the 8 beads in the Legend of the Eight Dogs are changed to 7. The title is borrowed from Bruce Lee's movie "Enter the Dragon".

In this way, the initial frame of the work was fixed.

Originally, it was planned to develop the storyline according to Toriyama's Ming version of "Journey to the West", but the person in charge, Kazuhiko Torishima, thought that "this is no different from Journey to the West itself", and the reaction was relatively cold.

Therefore, modern style costumes were added to the second draft, and the third draft was already very close to the real "Dragon Ball", and in the end, only the name and character design of the protagonist in Journey to the West were retained, as well as a few early episodes and items.

Oh, yes. It's 100% plagiarism in the early stage.

And the one upstairs said no.

What do you mean that there is only one named Monkey King?

Isn't there an oolong, bull demon, three-eyed flame mountain, etc. in Journey to the West?

Also Why is the protagonist of Dragon Ball called Son Goku? Why is his ** called the Golden Hoop Stick? Why is his mount also called a somersault cloud? And so on and so forth.

The difference between him and ordinary plagiarists is that he became popular, and then went to Journey to the West, Sun Wukong** is gone, somersault clouds are almost hidden, and there are some Journey to the West elements, Zhu Bajie, Erlang Shenniu Demon King's god-like characters, etc., have disappeared, typical behavior of covering ears and stealing bells.

If it's not that the heart is weak, why these important characters have disappeared, it's just that I'm afraid that someone will see these things and think of Journey to the West.

Not counted. Because the characters and plots in Dragon Ball are different from those in Journey to the West, plus the Monkey King in Dragon Ball is a person, which is completely different from Journey to the West, but there is a character named Monkey King.

Journey to the West is the Monkey King master and apprentice four people around the road to learn the scriptures, the Monkey King and his friends in Dragon Ball are around the search for the Dragon Ball, I have thought about it for a long time, regardless of the plot; methods of fighting, characters; story development; The endings are all different, only here is the same, if it's just a little bit, it doesn't count, there are many versions of Huo Yuanjia in China, characters; The end of the story is almost the same, if it's like what you said, don't the later versions of Huo Yuanjia plagiarize the previous ones.

Personally, I think: In short, whether it is the Monkey King in Journey to the West or the Monkey King in Dragon Ball, it is the same, as long as it looks good and makes people like it, they all have strengths.

Hope satisfied.

At first, it was plagiarism, Akira Toriyama read the book "Journey to the West", and was attracted by the image of Sun Wukong's characteristics, and drew Dragon Ball in the back, because of the distinct form of fighting, it became the originator of the hot-blooded man, and then in order to cover up the word plagiarism, he created his own Saiyan series, telling the life experience of Sun Wukong, his real name is Kakarot is an alien, so it is not plagiarism.

Count,You can look at the anime that appears now.,There's a 5-line that has a brain-dead saying that it plagiarized Japanese manga.,These Japanese dogs are afraid that they've forgotten their ancestors.,The five elements are defined by China.。

Of course not, Dragon Ball's Monkey King will transform when he reaches the full moon, will Journey to the West? Are many of the plots the same later? Is there a turtle school qigong in Journey to the West? At most, it can only be a creation that borrows from the name.

Can't count. Because Son Goku is also a type of superman in the eyes of foreigners, and Dragon Ball just uses a name. What's more, the pronunciation of the Monkey King in Japanese has a different meaning than in Chinese. That's why Dahl called Monkey King Kakarot.

It's just that in the beginning part, some character names of Journey to the West are applied. The rest of the content has nothing to do with the country's classical classics. So it shouldn't be plagiarism.

Not counting the copyright law, which stipulates that a work no longer has copyright after 60 years of production.

No matter how others use it, it is not plagiarism.

No, it's a reference, because there is no similarity in the plot.

No, it should belong to re-creation.

If you say it, it can be counted Journey to the West is a Chinese masterpiece.

In the eyes of foreign countries, the Monkey King in Journey to the West is the same type as the foreign superman Spider-Man, so the name of the protagonist of Dragon Ball is Monkey King.

。, Monkey King represents strong and invincible.

Calculate! The author himself admitted it! Is it interesting that the fine days are still holding on to whitewashing?

No.,Although the name of the protagonist is the same.,But the content is different.。

In fact, they despise Zhang Jizhong mainly because they are afraid of subverting the image of Journey to the West, and those netizens don't think about it very well (of course, I'm not scolding them). In fact, Liu Xiaolingtong's opposition to Journey to the West is also afraid that he will subvert Journey to the West, because Journey to the West is very classic, and once it is subverted, it will have a bad image in the minds of people who have just come into contact with Journey to the West. For example, Japan's Journey to the West, which completely subverts Journey to the West, and many, such as Journey to the West in the United States, are completely messing around.

Because someone has filmed such a ** one after another, it has left a bad mark in the hearts of the masses, so that they don't want to watch those ** anymore, and naturally think that the remake is not good. Zhang Jizhong is very talented, and I also watched Yongle Hui, in fact, he can completely resist public opinion and shoot his Journey to the West well, I hope he can shoot it very well, and he can have the same high ratings as the old version of Journey to the West, completely changing people's thinking of denying remakes.

Smiling proudly, his remake is a classic?。。 No, he is now famous for remaking classic old movies and TV series, pure hype, the Chinese people are about to make him sick to death!

The main reason is that he is a little ambitious and talented, in fact, many world masterpieces have been remade many times.

The main reason is that the six-year-old children's version of Journey to the West is too classic, this is well-deserved, and so far I haven't seen any monkey pleasing to the eye except him.

He can't talk about ruining his films, and most of his ** are more faithful to the original work. It's just that sometimes the vision is a little worse when choosing actors.

Smiling and proud of the rivers and lakes is not a waste.

I think Li Yapeng is a good actor. But it may not be suitable for everything.

Occasionally, he is suspected of following the trend, but I think he is ambitious and wants to make a classic of mainland martial arts films.

is used to watching martial arts movies from Hong Kong and Taiwan, and many people think that martial arts movies should be like that. In addition, several martial arts films in Hong Kong and Taiwan are really good.

Others always compare the advantages of Hong Kong and Taiwan films with Zhang Jizhong's shortcomings, so that his shortcomings are magnified.

It's actually very unfair.

Zhang Jizhong said when he was a guest at Yongle Hui: The six-year-old children's version of Journey to the West is like a mountain standing there, can we move the mountain away? No way!!! But we can build another mountain next to it to make the mountains more beautiful.

In my opinion, Zhang Jizhong's reproduction of "Journey to the West" is not a waste of the classics, can it be said that the mainland versions of "The Legend of the Condor Heroes" and "The Legend of the Deer and Ding" that he filmed have ruined the Hong Kong version of the classics? Isn't it just as successful? So I hope that all Zhang Jizhong's fans can support the new "Journey to the West".

I think the previous version has become a classic (six young children, Ma Dehua), I'm afraid to shoot again... But it's still okay to shoot, the previous pictures and actions look a little too fake, and if you want to shoot it, you have to make it a classic, or don't shoot it.

Chinese No way. Hypocrisy + selfishness.

Because the writings have been ruined!!

Now relying on the Internet is like people yearning for free speech in the United States.

First, Liu Xiaolingtong has not criticized other "Journey to the West" too much, he has his understanding of "Journey to the West", everyone has everyone's understanding, but there is a problem of acceptance here, the original work is broad and profound, I have read the original book carefully, and I would have disdained many of the made up plots.

Second, the film and television drama itself is a recreation, although the content of the six-year-old children's version is too shallow compared with the original work, but at least it is an attitude of respect and admiration for the original work, so it has become its classic status. Others, just watch it as a drama, besides, there are many who just use the name of Journey to the West to promote themselves.

Third, from the perspective of the actor's portrayal of the role, the reason why the six-year-old child can have such a high degree of recognition is that it is originally infiltrated by the art of opera, which has been passed down from generation to generation, and is a performing art. Of course, Liu Xiaolingtong has never said that the monkey opera is dominant, and he constantly emphasizes that all kinds of arts are colorful. I have watched the monkey opera of Peking Opera, and it is indeed wonderful, but it is obviously different from Shao Opera.

From this aspect, it is impossible for other actors to play Monkey King with such a deep accumulation. I have also completely watched the Zhewei version of Journey to the West and the Zhang version of Journey to the West, the role of Sun Wukong imitates the traces of the six-year-old child too much, but the Zhang version of the Journey to the West Zhu Bajie has a big breakthrough, and my personal feeling is more in line with the original work.

Fourth, there is no need to argue about which version is more in line with the image description in the original book, everyone has their own settings. But with the image of the six-year-old boy Sun Wukong, although he knows what is described in the original book, he is still reluctant to connect the three words Sun Wukong and the Monkey King in the Demon Suppression chapter.

In any case, respect for art is the premise, of course, if you deliberately elevate yourself by belittling others, it is unacceptable, and the image is carried by others, not by yourself.