What do you think of the discrepancy in the quality of Canada goose pricing?

I thinkCanada Goose's pricing and quality are indeed a bit different, not that the quality of this brand is not good, but that it is overpriced for the anchor effect, None of their clothes can be called cheap, and the contrast between ** and quality is really great.

The quality of Canada Goose's official products is really good, this is a Canadian brand, Canada's climate is relatively cold, and there are many excellent cold-proof clothing brands there. And domestic products, some may be fakes, and some may come from foundries. This brand is also doing hunger marketing, the factory's production capacity is not enough to supply the Canada geese on the street, some of them must be fakes, and some may be other outsourcing foundries, so this brand may have such a problem.

Canada goose is positioned as a luxury product in China, a slightly better style of down jacket, the price is more than 8000, and low-end products are also 4000, and the early taste is not counted. And for the anchor effect, the masks and hats of the big goose are more than 1,000 yuan. On the other hand, domestic brands of the same price range are not only better than them in quality, but also have a better style than the design of Canada Goose.

The low-end products of Canada Goose are very expensive and have a very ugly design, and the cheap domestic brand design is a little better. These low-end brands are also launched by Canada Goose for anchors, and the pricing is very unreasonable.

The result of the big difference in pricing and quality is that this brand is not cost-effective. Their main advertisement is high-end cold-proof clothing, which can withstand the cold of minus 40 degrees. However, in many parts of China, the temperature can reach minus 40 degrees, in fact, most areas do not use this down jacket at all, and you will only feel hot when you wear it.

However, the sales of this brand are very good, so there may not be many consumers who are really in demand. There is no need for demand, there is no reason for domestic brands at the same price to choose Canada goose. Rich people buy this just to save trouble, because the most expensive one must be good, and ordinary people just need to choose their own suitable one.

I think people are very realistic now, the eyes of the masses are bright, they say that there is no problem, it is indeed too poor quality, there are big problems, everyone should be cautious when buying.

The quality of Canada goose is really good, and the cold protection effect is remarkable, but the price of Canada goose is too high, there is no good cost performance, and the domestic outdoor temperature is not very low, so there is no need.

It is true that Canada Goose is generally overpriced, but the quality is not necessarily good. There are many people who have reported that his quality is not good.

To be sure, Canada goose is generally priced on the high side, but the quality is inevitable. There are many people who have reported that they lack morality.

I think this evaluation is still very true, and I think the quality gap is really big, which makes me very disgusted.

I do agree with this assessment, because it not only highlights Canada Goose's double-standard behavior, but also shows that the brand is not accountable to consumers. No merchant has any privilege in front of consumers, because merchants should not only pay more attention to the needs of consumers, but also protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.

The Canada Goose incident has not only attracted widespread attention, but also sparked heated discussions. This incident will not only have a great impact on us, but also make us pay more attention to domestic brands. **Saying that the quality of Canada goose pricing is disgusting, I particularly agree with **'s evaluation, and there are three reasons for agreeing:

First, this assessment is very accurate and incisive.

The evaluation is a stark indication of the brand's discriminatory practices against Chinese consumers, and it also shows that the brand is not only unable to uphold the dignity of consumers, but also fails to treat domestic consumers equally. I do think that this assessment is particularly correct, because it is indeed particularly accurate and incisive, and it also fully explains the main reasons and background of the incident. <>

Second, this evaluation can show the low cost performance of the brand.

The reason why I agree with this review is that it does further show that the brand is less cost-effective, and it does not satisfy more consumers. Not only did we feel very angry that the brand treated consumers in different regions differently, but we also couldn't tolerate the brand's behavior, so this comment was especially in line with our hearts. <>

3. The evaluation can confirm the service level and quality of the brand.

This brand is not only improving the quality of goods, but also cannot provide consumers with better after-sales service. As consumers, we not only have the right of withdrawal as required by law, but we are also able to return goods in a timely manner if they are defective in quality. Therefore, the brand's behavior has violated the law, and it can also show that it does not have a high level of service, so I agree with this evaluation.

That's my opinion.

I agree, I think this evaluation is very reasonable and only travelive, Canada goose has problems in these aspects, and it is very unfair to consumers.

I agree with this evaluation, Canada Goose is completely double standard for China and foreign countries, which is particularly unfair to many Chinese consumers.

Of course I agreed. Because this evaluation is very fair, and it protects the rights and interests of consumers.

I very much agree with this evaluation of **, because this evaluation is very fair, and it also criticizes the problems of unscrupulous merchants.

Canada Goose was scolded for being on the hot search because he dug three big holes for Chinese consumers. Some of his pits are pits that discriminate against us Chinese, so they are specially customized. There are also some pitfalls that ignore some of our relevant laws in China and are illegal acts.

It is because of his reckless attitude that he was scolded by netizens on the hot search, resulting in the destruction of his reputation. I think there should be severe punishment for such companies, otherwise they will not have a long memory.

Originally, they didn't return goods to Chinese consumers, but when the relevant personnel went to interview, he had another set of arguments. The staff asked him if it was clearly written on the official website that he could return the goods within 30 days without a reason, so why couldn't he return them? So they said that 30 days no reason to return, mainly for other countries, for China to use 7 days for no reason to return.

Isn't this clearly looking down on us Chinese and cutting our Chinese's leeks? <>

The trigger for this incident was that a customer wanted to return the product, but they didn't give it back. When the interviewer asked him why he didn't give him a refund, he said that the customer needed to sign an agreement before he could buy something, and that agreement stated that he would not be allowed to return the goods. His approach seems to be very reasonable, but in fact, such a treaty is illegal in China and is not allowed.

For such a company that violates the law and discriminates against Chinese, I think he should be severely punished. Can't let him comfortably eat Chinese food and smash Chinese pots. If he can continue like this comfortably, it will only make him look down on us Chinese even more.

Therefore, for such foreign companies, we must severely punish them.

After reading it, remember to like + follow + collect.

I think this incident is particularly shocking to me, because the Canada goose doesn't really have much of a role. However, it has aroused the interest of many Chinese consumers, but we should face this matter with a rational attitude. Shop responsibly, too.

I think this matter is very bad, because it can be seen that the clothes of this brand are very bad, and it is also very discredited, so I think this brand will definitely be punished as it deserves.

I think this matter is still very bad, because it can be seen that the three views of this brand are not very positive, the moral character is not very good, and the person is not very kind.

Introduction: It stands to reason that if a company makes a small problem, it can be solved in time, but I didn't expect Canada Goose to be commented by CCTV. CCTV commented that the quality of Canada geese is poor but does not return, so how will this matter develop? <>

The woman bought a down jacket worth tens of thousands of yuan in the Canada Goose store, and the quality was very poor, and it was not worthy of ** at all, so she chose to return it. The staff of Big Goose said that all the clothes purchased in the store will not be returned, and a "bully clause" like this also made netizens very shocked. The Shanghai Consumer Protection Association also immediately interviewed the staff of Canada Goose, and in the process of the interview, the staff of Canada Goose also changed their arrogant attitude in the past, saying that the clothes purchased in Chinese mainland can be returned and exchanged.

However, there are many conditions for this return, including the limitation of the purchase time, the restriction of the purchase channel, etc., netizens feel that although it can be returned, there are still many people who still have no way to successfully return after this clause is added. Therefore, Canada Goose did not win the support of netizens in this matter, and its brand reputation was also damaged, but it still did not provide a very good solution. <>

In fact, Canada Goose is a down jacket brand from Canada, and the development of the brand has been relatively stable, and the clothing style is relatively simple. In addition, there are some stores in Canada and the United States, but the number is not many, and later through marketing and various people to bring goods, Canada Goose successfully became popular in China. Quickly opened more than 10 stores in China, and every time it opened, it was huge, and some people were still queuing up to buy clothes.

Therefore, the marketing of Canada Goose in China is very successful, from an overseas second-tier brand to a domestic first-tier brand. But even so, Canada Goose has not improved the quality of its own services. <>

When overseas brands enter the domestic market, they should follow China's laws and regulations and respect the rights and interests of consumers, so as to achieve effective competition. Moreover, overseas brands themselves have hit the development of local brands, and they should be strictly regulated.

They may apologize, and if they don't, they will withdraw from our market, and some of us are very resistant to that.

They may apologize, because the relevant departments take this matter very seriously, and they will definitely give us a good explanation.

There has been an update on this matter, and the relevant departments have interviewed the merchants, hoping to protect the interests of the Chinese side to a certain extent.

The brand will definitely apologize, the relevant departments will intervene in the investigation, the impact of this matter is very bad, and it will definitely be fined.

I think Canada goose.

It is not worth our purchase, because the brand is not only not responsible to the consumer, but also cannot provide better service to the consumer, so the brand is not eligible to be purchased by us. If a brand can't adhere to a consumer-centric business philosophy.

And respect the consumer's choice, then the brand will not be able to gain the support of consumers.

As a large brand, Canada Goose is not only unable to adhere to the right position, but also cannot consciously maintain the personal dignity of consumers, which cannot be tolerated by us. Canada goose has been convicted of false publicity.

When questioned, I don't think we should buy this brand, and there are three reasons why I say that:

First, this brand is cost-effective.

The reason why this brand is not worth buying is because the brand not only cannot proceed from reality, but also cannot formulate a more real and reasonable **. Not only is the quality of the brand's goods low, but it also fails to gain consumer recognition. But the brand is not only unable to realize this problem, but also cannot reduce the ** of the product, so this brand is not cost-effective.

Second, the brand's after-sales service is poor.

Another serious reason is that the brand is not only unable to improve its service level and quality, but also fails to satisfy more consumers. As consumers, we should not only be treated equally, but also fairly. But this brand not only discriminates against consumers in China, but also harms our legitimate rights and interests, so we don't need to support this brand.

Third, the brand's business philosophy is wrong.

We do respect foreign brands, and we are able to break the mold and choose according to our preferences. But our respect can't be exchanged for the brand's respect, and in that case, we don't need to forgive the brand for what it did. Because of the brand's double standard.

Not only is behavior offensive to us, but it is also unacceptable to us. <>

That's my opinion.

I think Canada Goose is still worth buying, because the quality of the clothes of this brand is very good, but now that something like this has happened, I don't think there is any need for everyone to buy it.