Why didn t the world s first human beings actually exist at all?

According to the point of view of biological evolution, human beings evolved from apes, and in this process of evolution, it is more about the evolution and superposition of cells, so the first human beings did not exist at all.

Because the definition of human beings is very vague in the first place, when late Homo sapiens appeared, he could be defined as a human being, but his evolution was gradual and there were no obvious boundaries, and it is unknown who was the first human being.

Because human beings are made of cells, and cells are formed by the combination of many groups, there can not be only one human being, nor can there be a first human being.

It was evolved by primates. When the first primate began to use tools, it marked the birth of the first human.

According to what we know, the formation of "man" is in accordance with Darwinian evolution, it is a slow gradual process, and it is impossible to say which ape completed the transformation from ape to man.

35 million years ago, a primate evolved into Australopithecus, and in the late evolutionary stage of this species, the famous Australopithecus, Rama australopithecus, forest Australopithecus and so on. Among them, the "Lucy Maiden" fossil found in East Africa is a 3.2 million-year-old ancient human fossil and is known as the "mother of mankind".

Australopithecus gradually learned to walk upright, so Homo erectus appeared, including the famous Peking Man (700,000 200,000 years ago) in China, and the Javanese ape Man in Indonesia. The reason why Peking Man is important is that the ape man in this period was a transitional stage of evolution from "ape" to "man".

When exploring the origin of human beings, it is necessary to first establish the premise that human beings are a biological species, and they can only have one ancestor, and cannot be multiple ancestors. It cannot be said that blacks have one ancestor and whites have another.

Because although different species can marry each other, they cannot give birth to offspring, and only the same species can have children. If we advocate the theory of human multi-ancestry, we will make a common-sense mistake in biology, which has confirmed that human multi-ancestry or pluralism is contrary to scientific common sense.

There were no humans on Earth, so how did the first "man" appear? After reading it, I have seen the insight.

Evolution is measured in populations. Population gene pools are considered rather than individual gene sequences.

There is no such thing as a mutated realm.

The limit is the result of the separation of apes, but rather the spread of multiple mutations to the gene pool.

So there is no such thing as the "first man", only the "first human population".

Suppose you set the median gene pool of Australopithecus a (to help the landlord understand that there is such a value) to 0 and the median gene of humans to 10.

However, the definition area of Australopithecus A should be (-2,2), that is, the range from -2 to 2 is Australopithecus A.

The definition of human beings is (8,12), that is, the range from 8 to 12 is human.

Then the steps are:

1.There is an individual mutation of a + (i.e., a mutation in the direction of humans). The effect on the mean is minimal, and then the mutation becomes dominant, and after many generations, it slowly spreads into a community.

2.There is an individual mutation of +, which has little effect on the average, and then the mutation has a predominance, and after many generations, it slowly spreads to a community.

3.The presence of a +5 mutation still has little effect on the average, this mutation has no advantage, does not give birth and dies, and has no effect on the community.

Possible situations in between:

The definition of Australopithecus b is (, which overlaps with the definition of Australopithecus a, and they have partial reproductive isolation.

Then the definition of Australopithecus c is (3 7) They do not overlap with the definition of Australopithecus a, and are completely isolated, but they are not completely isolated from Australopithecus b.

What I want to say is:

There was no "first man", just a group of creatures who were once "apes and men".

Because he satisfies the definition of a certain ape and man at the same time.

When you talk about this, it suddenly occurred to me.

In "Crazy Aliens" starring Huang Bo and Shen Teng, Darwin's theory of evolution mentions that there may be a higher civilization than us, to be precise, there may be aliens in the world that we have not found so far.

The birth of the first human being, perhaps as Einstein said, was really a divine creation, and many people have doubted the theory that humans evolved from apes. Dogs evolved from wolves, why are there wolves in the world, it is better to say that some wolves were influenced by humans and evolved into dogs, so many languages have not been unified, and the theory of the harmonious coexistence of canines and primates has been completely overturned.

As He said, there is no such thing as a real first human being, and that there is no fallacy that the first human beings are scattered all over the world, and since the same life and civilization are needed, there will be no first birth.

The creation of human beings by Nuwa pushed out by the ancients is unbelievable to a certain extent, but the creation theory does not come out of thin air, and in the distant future, human beings may have answers in order to survive.

The emergence of life on the earth was the earliest in the ocean, which was also formed after hundreds of millions of years of gestation, the earth was in just the right position, the sun provided energy for the earth, life appeared on the earth, and after tens of millions of years of development, various large animals, dinosaurs, etc., and finally until the emergence of human beings.

Darwin's theory of evolution is that man evolved from apes. But I once read an article about the discovery of a nuclear reactor while taking oil, so it's likely that Darwin's theory of evolution was not correct. Of course, we can't refute him now, but I believe that this theory may be disproved in the future.

Humans may have entered Earth from outer space.

It could be a biological experiment done by a more advanced species, or something like the movie Prometheus.

He wasn't the only one when he appeared.

Rather, it evolved slowly in batches.

Due to the specific ambient temperature, under the influence of time.

The abundance of food and the balance of nutrition.

God made it. The Bible says, God says:

We are to make man in our image, according to our likeness, so that they will have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, over the cattle of the earth, over all the earth, and over all the creeping things that crawl on the earth.

Genesis 1:26-27.

There was originally nothing on the earth, why are there humans and animals on the earth now, trees and flowers, this is all created by the spirit of God, saying that man is evolved, then how is it not perfect, and some say that man is an ape, so why is the ape not changing now, so whether it is a person or a variety of animals, the scientist can't tell how it came about, so I think that everything on the earth is created by the gods.

This is the question of whether there is a chicken or an egg first, no one can say, the theory of evolution is still controversial, and the first man would have changed if it had not been for the sudden wisdom of the ape.

Humans are just illegitimate children of aliens, and they dare not bring them home, so they will throw them to the earth to fend for themselves.

Man evolved from an ape, not by an individual ape, but by natural selection, the favorable variation that was retained in natural selection continued to become a common genetic trait of the population through intraspecific reproduction, so evolution is based on the population, and it is meaningless to discuss the individual individually.

Two clouds, the charge on this side is different from the charge on the other side, the voltage is very large, he will discharge when he walks around, these two clouds discharge on the same route, the discharge is an electric arc. The center point of the arc can heat the air at this center point to tens of millions of degrees in thousandths of a second. The temperature of tens of millions of degrees makes the air expand suddenly, and it makes a sound, and the sound of the air ** is thunder.

The air is outward, putting pressure on the surrounding air, and it is impossible for him to pour this air out of it at once, putting pressure on the surrounding air. So all these materials in the air are formed into amino acids under the pressure of this instantaneous atmospheric pressure. This amino acid itself is half a living body.

This has been experimented with in scientific experiments, and human amino acids are also formed in this way.

This is an evolutionary process, and there is no first one from a scientific point of view.

How the first human beings on earth appeared is like an ancient legend, believe in the words of the gods and let Nuwa create people.

If you look at the myths and stories, the first human beings in the world should be Nuwa or Adam, but the myths are not real history, they are all stories of virtual existence imagined by the ancients, so in reality, Nuwa and Adam are not the first humans on the earth, since they are not the first humans in the world, who is the first person on the earth?

According to the most scientific statement at present, life on the earth is evolved, that is, life is evolved from non-living matter, archaeologists have found that about 3 billion years ago, the earth not only cooled down but also appeared in an environment suitable for life to survive, at this time the most basic substances of life amino acids and proteins began to appear, these basic life substances after hundreds of millions of years of evolution and evolution, and finally formed the initial form of life - single-celled organisms, In this way, life changed from single cells to multicellular, multicellular into simple marine organisms, simple marine organisms and then into complex marine organisms, terrestrial organisms and flying organisms, after a long period of accumulation, life on earth finally ushered in a life explosion 100 million years ago, chordates, demodicos, brachiopods, arthropods, etc., which did not appear before all appeared collectively in this period, and there was a scene of life prosperity, known as the Cambrian explosion of life.

After the Cambrian explosion of life, the life on the earth began to be abundant, and the first generation of biological overlords on the earth was born about 100 million years ago - dinosaurs, why are dinosaurs called the first generation of biological overlords on the earth? Because if you want to become the biological overlord of the earth, you must be in an advantageous position in all aspects, from the three fields of sea, land and air to dominate the earth, and in the long-term evolution of life on the earth, the dinosaur race took the lead in having this ability, thus becoming the first generation of biological overlords on the earth, unfortunately, the dinosaur family that has lived on the earth for hundreds of millions of years was finally destroyed by the impact of an asteroid with a diameter of only 10 kilometers.

There were no human beings on Earth, so how did the first "man" come about? After reading the knowledge.

They say it evolved from Australopithecus.

The first humans were ape evolved.

3. The first human on Earth, probably programmed from another civilization. In fact, our earth may be an alien laboratory, it is precisely because we think so, so our first human being, or it may be shaped by aliens, or it may be specially set according to the original biological shape on the earth, so the first human on the earth may also be completely from the programming of a civilization.

In fact, for us, there were no human beings on the earth in the first place, so the first human on the earth may be the product of the long evolution of the earth, or it may be the descendant of aliens from its own distant earth, or it may also be programmed by another high-latitude civilization.

For a long time, we have been constantly tracing the origin of human beings, there were no human beings on the earth, do you know how the first "human" came about?

There is also a saying that a higher civilization banished human beings to this planet, because human beings have heavy desires and are aggressive, so banishing human beings here is a very simple thing for advanced civilizations. This claim has always existed, and it seems to be the case, but there is a lack of evidence. Many UFO enthusiasts are convinced of this and don't know if it's true.

I believe in this statement, and I think that a better civilization is a light that exists in light, that is, a beam of light. Do you think it's right?

How do you think humans came to be? Why is it on this planet?

According to the theory of biological evolution, man evolved slowly from apes, and man was made up of a combination of cells, and the first man may not be smart enough but certainly intelligent.

Humans evolved slowly from Australopithecus, and over many years, some of the crawling apes became upright walkers, and then evolved into our current humans.

The first human was fabricated out of clay by Nuwa, an alien creature with creative abilities.

There were no human beings on Earth, so how did the first "man" come about?

There were no humans on Earth, so how did the first "man" come about?