-
Because Ali is involved in some Internet monopoly matters, now we have been emphasizing anti-monopoly, when these giant companies implement monopoly, it is actually not conducive to the development of this industry.
When we talk about this issue, we should actually focus on monopoly and anti-monopoly, because at present, giant companies have appeared in many industries, and when such companies grow, it is not conducive to the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, let alone the development of the entire industry. If there is no restraint on these enterprises, then these enterprises will engage in so-called monopolistic behavior.
Ali was fined 18.2 billion yuan.
This fine can be called a sky-high fine, because no company has ever received such a serious fine, Alibaba was issued the largest fine in history because of monopoly problems, and the value has reached 18.2 billion yuan. It is precisely because of Alibaba's monopoly problem that many Internet companies have begun to correct their behavior and avoid being punished for monopoly like Alibaba. <>
Ali is suspected of Internet monopoly.
This reason is very simple, because Ali is currently a very large Internet company, in China's Internet market, there are basically only two giants, Ali and Tencent, and the two giants have a very large influence on the industry, soWhen Ali makes monopolistic behavior, it is not conducive to the development of the industry as a whole
In the future, the supervision of monopolistic behavior will be more stringent.
We must know that when an enterprise develops to a certain scale, the enterprise will use its own ability to absorb resources, but this behavior is not conducive to the development of the industry, and it is not conducive to the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises. For those relatively small enterprises, if the large companies engage in monopolistic behavior, the small companies will basically be in a state of serious lack of resources, and it is very likely that they will be forced to die due to development problems. We have always advocated fair competition and healthy competition, monopolistic behavior will be strictly regulated, and more and more anti-monopoly standards will be set in the future!
-
Because it has some illegal products, and these products are particularly expensive, they do not protect everyone's rights and interests at all, so they will be fined.
-
It may be that he has done something immoral and occupied the interests of customers, which will also cause such bad consequences, which is particularly serious.
-
The Anti-Monopoly Bureau of the State Administration for Market Regulation investigated and punished Alibaba's suspected either-or, simply put, merchants can only sell on the Alibaba platform, and if they go to other platforms, Ali will not let consumers search for the product, which is suspected of monopoly sales.
-
The main reason for being fined suddenly is that there are some violations, in which case there is a fine, and his violation is a very, serious performance, and there is no relevant safety certificate.
-
Because Ali had a lot of operations that were very inappropriate, he was suddenly fined.
-
Ali was fined because of the monopoly of the industry, this thing tells everyone that even if the company is economically strong, it must strictly abide by the laws and regulations of the country, and violations of laws and regulations will be punished, and no company will be given special treatment.
-
Because the company had unreasonable behavior and required the merchants to carry out ** activities to increase the income of profits, it was fined.
-
Mainly because there has been a series of monopoly phenomena, and this behavior can be said to have aroused many people's disgust and doubts, so it will lead to the other party being fined in this process, which is also partly the reason.
-
Because it is suspected of market monopoly. This is very wrong, so it is a matter of course to be fined.
-
It is because it has caused many formal businesses to suffer, and it has also disrupted some social order, affected fair competition, and caused market monopoly.
-
Mainly because they were suspected of some irregularities in the scale of their business, and through this consideration, they were punished accordingly.
-
Because this company was complained about using the limit word. Violated the new ad and was reported instead. That's why so much money will be fined.
-
Because it monopolizes the e-commerce industry, many merchants are forced to choose 1 of 2. So Ali was severely punished, and monopoly is not right.
-
Let's tell a real thing, in 2012, at the Hangzhou Conference on Lighting ** Road, I accompanied my friends to make soy sauce, walked a long way to buy bread, went to the bathroom and came back, and was taken by Xiao Er to others to eat, I remember very clearly, asked her why she took my bread, Xiao Er said, saw no one and took ......Corporate culture affects the quality of employees, the quality of employees reflects the company's culture, it is inevitable to be fined, 2015 began to be reported, after 6 years of fines, those who were chosen by one of the two businesses have experienced many hardships ...... so many years
-
Because Alibaba acquired three companies, but did not collectively declare, violating relevant regulations.
-
It should be the Ali economy that monopolizes the e-commerce industry. So Ali was punished. Monopoly is incorrect.
-
AlibabaThis company will be punished by the regulatory authorities because of monopoly, and 18.2 billion yuan will not have much impact on Alibaba, but the impact on the market is still relatively large.
Alibaba's annual profit can reach more than 200 billion yuan, so 18.2 billion yuan is not a relatively large amount for this company. In fact, we can also see from this incident that the punishment for large companies has been increasing, and our country is against market monopoly.
First, our country's monopoly punishment is getting stronger and stronger. The punishment for monopoly in our country is indeed getting bigger and bigger, and it has never reached such a scale before, and companies like Alibaba can play a certain role in benchmarking society, and leading enterprises have been punished, so companies in other industries must also regulate their own behavior. <>
Second, it has also played a certain deterrent role in other industries. I think the best thing about this punishment is that it can have a certain deterrent effect on other industries in this society, and the deterrent effect is very necessary, because there are also monopolistic behaviors in other industries, and we must let the leading companies in other industries know that our country is cracking down on monopoly more and more. <>
Third, it is the common people who are ultimately harmed by monopoly. The reason why the state is constantly cracking down on monopoly is because the people of our country have been affected by these companies, if these companies have been monopolizing the industry, the cost of people's daily life will definitely be higher and higher, and it is the people who will be hurt in the end, so these enterprises must be punished, in order to protect the interests of the people. <>
Our country's punishment of Alibaba can gain influence that is beneficial to societyPunishing Alibaba will allow other companies to operate more properly, as a socialist country.
Every decision made by the state is for the sake of the people.
-
It is because Alibaba Group is suspected of illegal monopoly, which affects the development of social diversity and fair competition in society, so it will be punished.
-
Because it has caused a monopoly in the market, many legitimate businesses have suffered losses, and this has also disrupted the market order and is not conducive to fair competition, so it should be fined.
-
Because Ali has a monopoly in their industry, after all, Ali is the biggest leader in their industry, this monopoly is not only bad for customers and merchants, but the state has issued such a heavy fine to Ali this time, so that Ali began to rectify, and I think it is very beneficial to users.
-
For abusing its monopoly position and forcing merchants to "choose one of the two", Alibaba violated the Anti-Monopoly Law, and was punished by 4% of its annual revenue, with a total fine of 18.2 billion yuan.
-
Because Ali violated the anti-monopoly law and wanted to monopolize the entire market, his practice was very bad, so he was punished by the law.
-
Because Ali is now developing better and better, monopolizing a lot of market economies, in order to protect people's rights and consumption, they are warned and fined.
-
China's Anti-Monopoly Law has been officially implemented, and Alibaba has abused the platform monopoly by prohibiting other operators from opening stores or participating in the best activities of other platforms on other platforms, violating the Anti-Monopoly Law.
-
Because he violated the anti-monopoly law and the company was too large, he began to squeeze the living space of other small and micro enterprises.
-
Mainly because in other things, I have done a lot of incomprehensible things, and caused a series of losses to others, so I will make a series of compensation to others and avoid problems in this regard.
-
The State Administration for Market Regulation imposed an administrative penalty on Alibaba for implementing the "either-or" monopolistic behavior on the online platform in accordance with the law, and imposed a fine of 100 million yuan.
-
1.The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) is investigating Alibaba Group
2.About the businesses involved in Alibaba Group
In fact, this is not a simple punishment, but mainly to remind some other companies that they should strengthen internal control and compliance management, maintain fair competition on the platform, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of platform merchants and consumers. Therefore, the state will come forward to supervise the law, and I believe that the market will get better and better in the future.
-
The fine is because he has violated market regulations by malicious competition, malicious marketing, and has broken market regulations. So it was fined.
-
The reason for the fine is Alibaba's alleged monopoly, and it has been since 2015.
-
Monopolize. Alibaba monopolizes the market and requires merchants to "choose one of the two", which is illegal.
-
The sky-high fine of 100 million yuan came in a timely manner and upheld the principle of fair competition in the market.
-
The main reason for the fine is that Alibaba has a monopoly incident in his industry, because monopoly is expressly prohibited by the state, but Alibaba knowingly committed it, so this time it was fined, I think it is also a warning to them.
-
It seems that they did not participate in anti-monopoly activities, and the development of the enterprise has monopolized the entire industry, and the relevant departments have imposed penalties.
-
The main reason for Alibaba's hefty fines is that it has been practicing monopolistic practices for a long time.
According to official disclosure information, since 2015, Alibaba has abused its dominant market position due to its huge market space and the massive data, rules and technology of the platform. The State Administration for Market Regulation imposed an administrative penalty on the relevant regulations of the Anti-Monopoly Law and imposed a fine of 4% of the sales revenue of the previous year, totaling 100 million yuan. The specific reasons for punishment are as follows:
1) Excluding or restricting competition in China's domestic online retail platform service market. Alibaba's restriction on the operators on the platform can only conduct transactions with them, and they cannot enter other competitive platforms or carry out first-class activities on other competitive platforms, which directly weakens the ability of other competitive platforms to compete fairly with Alibaba and the degree of competition in the relevant market, unduly raises the market entry barriers of potential competitors, and undermines the fair and orderly market competition order.
2) harming the interests of operators on the platform. Alibaba's relevant actions have directly restricted the operational autonomy of operators on the platform, weakened the intra-brand competition of goods, and harmed the interests of operators on the platform. The first is to damage the operational autonomy of operators on the platform.
The second is to improperly derogate from the legitimate interests of operators on the platform. The third is to weaken the degree of competition within the brand.
3) Hindering the optimal allocation of resources and restricting the innovative development of the platform economy. Alibaba's relevant behavior has hindered the optimal allocation of resources in the online retail platform service market, inhibited the vitality of market players, and restricted the innovation and development of the platform economy. One is that it hinders the free flow of factors and reduces the efficiency of resource allocation.
The second is to restrict the diversification, differentiation and innovative operation of operators within the platform. Third, it inhibits the vitality of market entities and affects the innovation and development of the platform economy.
4) Harming the interests of consumers. Alibaba's actions have restricted consumers' right to free choice and fair trade, and harmed consumers' interests. One is that it restricts consumers' freedom of choice.
The second is that it restricts consumers' right to fair trade. The third is the potential damage to the overall level of social welfare in the long run.
-
Ali was fined 25.3 billion yuan for violating the Anti-Monopoly Law.
The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) conducted an investigation into Alibaba Group and found that Alibaba and its affiliates had monopolistic practices in areas such as internet retail, wholesale markets, online advertising, and cloud computing. The results of the investigation show that Ali restricts the independence of competitors through various means, restricts competition in the market, and infringes on the rights and interests of consumers and merchants.
As a result, the State Administration for Market Regulation imposed a fine of 25.3 billion yuan on Ali and required it to rectify the situation in order to restore fair competition in the city.
On April 10, the State Administration for Market Regulation issued a complaint against AlibabaSuspected of monopolizing the Internet retail marketA penalty was imposed, ordering Alibaba Group to cease its illegal acts and imposing a fine of 4% of its 2019 domestic sales of 100 million yuan, totaling 100 million yuan. This penalty is also the largest anti-monopoly fine ever issued by China to a company, after the highest fine was 100 million yuan for Qualcomm's anti-monopoly fine. >>>More
Recently, Alibaba Group.
For violating the Anti-Monopoly Law >>>More
Because New Oriental has tax problems in its operation and tax evasion, they will be fined.
This practice is not right, there is no bottom line, for their own interests to do this kind of unethical thing, and then there will be an investigation and corresponding punishment, there must be a very clear goal, to apologize to people, to compensate them, but also to develop relevant strategies to supervise them.
This fine is a fine issued by the CBA, and the money will naturally be handed over to the CBA, but according to the situation of the news**, the money should eventually need to be handed over to the sponsor, after all, the contract is here, and the player who pays the money is not in accordance with the regulations is considered a breach of contract, so it is natural to provide liquidated money. >>>More