Should the law be on the side of justice or justice? What s your opinion?

Personally, I think that the law is on the side of justice, and at the same time, I also think that there is justice in this society, because the law is a moral bottom line of our country, only when we can't deal with things that we can't solve, we will use the help of the law to solve the incidents involved, so the law must be fair and just.

The role of legal respect is to provide stable behavior to the society, and the expectation is simply to allow everyone to be as clear as possible about what kind of behavior they and others will bring about for example, we drive to an intersection with a traffic light, and we are green in front of us, so we can safely and boldly go straight through, even if we can't see the red light signs at other intersections, but because according to the rules, we can reasonably expect that when we hold the pass, Other intersections will be red lights, and if someone violates this rule, he will definitely be punished, and that's what the law and rules provide to all of us to expect from each other. <>

In the face of the law, that is, we will not be punished for violating the rules, and abiding by the rules will also lead to damage to your interests, then the whole society will be chaotic into a lawless society, so why should we study the law and understand the logic of the law, because based on this theory, we can advance **. Because of the sanctions and constraints of the law, our lives can be controlled. <>

Legal knowledge, the minimum moral requirements for people, more important is the moral code in people's hearts, which is why we still need to listen to the voice of the society, in fact, morality is higher than the respect of the law, not exploitation and exploitation, the purpose of the law is to maintain order, and it needs to be backed by punishment. So if it were you, do you think the law should be on the side of justice or justice? In fact, everyone has different ideas and opinions in their hearts on this issue, but everyone must abide by the bottom line of the law.

Justice and righteousness are not opposites. The law should be on the side of justice, not on the side of injustice. It's antithetical.

The law should be on the side of justice, not on the side of injustice. It's antithetical. The law should be on the side of justice and justice, not on the side of injustice and injustice.

It's antithetical.

I think the law should be on the side of justice; Because everything the law does is to protect the lives of ordinary people, once something happens, the law should stand on the side of justice, so as not to live up to the expectations of good people, and the law is very strict for some illegal acts, and it also ensures the safety of everyone.

The general situation of the law should stand on the side of justice, although justice sometimes needs to be supported, but sometimes, some righteous things will also touch the bottom line of the law.

I think the law should be on the side of justice; Because at all times, the law should be just and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people.

The formal justice of law and the substantive justice of law are not antagonistic, but complementary. Substantive justice is the basic value of the legal system and the ultimate goal pursued by law. Formal justice is the basic guarantee of substantive justice, and is the premise and foundation for the realization of justice.

Judges should try their best to maintain a form consistent with the logic of the past, and realize the purpose of the law to serve the society, that is, to pursue substantive justice through formal justice, that is, through the curtain of cold logic.

Behind the judge's "intellectual desire" for the symmetry of the form and substance of the law lies the law itself, which strives to protect the truth of the law on human emotions and the virtue of the legal practitioner. Substantive justice is certainly the ultimate goal of the rule of law, and formal justice is also the basic requirement of the rule of law.

The value of the law lies in the achievement of justice. The justice of the law can be divided into formal justice and substantive justice. Formal justice, also known as procedural justice and procedural justice, is to act in strict accordance with legal procedures, and it focuses on the justice of forms and means; Substantive justice refers only to the fact that the law must conform to natural law and human reason, and it focuses on the justice of content and purpose.

The system implemented in our country is to govern the country according to the law, supplemented by the rule of law, legal form justice refers to the justice within the scope of the law, in accordance with the law, for example, you see that others are committing crimes, you can stop him or report him, this belongs to the legal form of justice, substantive justice refers to the scope of governing the country by virtue, for example, you see a person scolding another person, you can stop the person who scolds, this belongs to substantive justice.

Formal justice is the way to ensure the realization of substantive justice, and the realization of substantive justice is inseparable from the fairness of formal justice.

Justice, in itself, is divided into formal justice and substantive justice. First of all, formal justice, as the name suggests, is to ensure that the form is just, that is, it is just and fair in the litigation procedure, and there can be no favoritism in the litigation procedure. That is, formal equality is first guaranteed, and as legal subjects, both parties are equal before the law.

Substantive justice, on the other hand, is a kind of justice in consequence. That is, to strive for the outcome of the rebellion, and to have a compromise justice for both sides in essence. This kind of justice is achieved mainly by sentencing.

Therefore, the law is essentially a tool to maintain the rule of the state, and in this regard, the law protects the interests of the whole, that is, it is an absolute justice. For individuals, the law is a way to achieve ultimate justice for both parties. Therefore, the law is ultimately trying its best to uphold fairness and justice.

Hope it helps.

Summary. Hello dear, the so-called justice of the law means that the law itself must conform to social justice.

Hello dear, the so-called justice of the law means that the law itself must conform to social justice.

Just as people have"Good and evil", the law also has"Good and evil", that's what it's called"Good eggplant hand lead method"with"Vicious trembling good potato trace method"。Conform to"Social justice"The law is"Good law", violated"Social justice"The law is"Evil law"。

The embodiment of the early chain of the law's guarantee of fairness and justice is that the law incorporates the main areas of social life and its important social relations into the law; legal rights and legal duty mechanisms to fairly distribute the benefits and burdens of society; Recognition and punishment mechanisms for legal effects.

Article 3 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China provides that the personal rights, property rights, and other lawful rights and interests of civil subjects are protected by law and must not be infringed upon by any organization or individual. Article 4 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China stipulates that the legal status of civil subjects in civil activities is equal. Article 4 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China provides equality in the application of the law to all persons who commit crimes.

No one is allowed to have privileges beyond the law.

What is the relationship between law and justice? The relationship between law and justiceLaw and justice are interrelated and mutually reinforcing, and justice has played a certain role in promoting the development of law. Justice, as the highest goal pursued by law, is the criterion for distinguishing good law from bad law, and has always been the spiritual driving force for the evolution of law.

At the same time, the law is also an important means of achieving justice, and the minimum requirement for justice is to limit arbitrary violence. The law uses the coercion of the state to protect the legitimate interests of social subjects, and to achieve social justice by adjudicating disputes and punishing unjust illegal acts. The influence of the concept of justice on the law is mainly reflected in the following aspects:

1. Justice is the spirit of the law. The law is a reflection of the will of the ruling class. But as the ruling class, they cannot depart from the popular and universal notion of justice to make laws.

Laws that deviate from justice have the name of law, but not the reality of law. The law without the spirit of justice is lost in which the members of society lose faith, and no one respects it and obeys it. Without the spirit of justice embedded in it, the law cannot play its due role.

2. Justice is an important yardstick and standard for measuring the merits of law. The criteria for measuring the merits of a law are varied. Among them, whether the law meets the requirements of justice is an important criterion for evaluating the merits of the law.

If a law appears to the majority of society to be unjust, it is bound to be opposed by the majority, no matter how useful the legislator may think it may be. (2) The role of law in justice is reflected in the following aspects: 1. The law guarantees distributive justice.

Every society has a large amount of natural and social resources. Therefore, it is necessary to have a set of principles that embody the justice demands of the majority of people to guide the members of society in the appropriate allocation of resources, interests, and burdens, so as to ensure the utilization of resources, the sharing of interests, and the orderly bearing of burdens. 2. When distributive justice is not realized, corrective justice plays its role.

Corrective justice refers to the re-establishment or restoration of distributive justice in accordance with the principle of equality when it is destroyed. If a person violates the rights or property of another person, remedial justice requires the aggressor to compensate the victim for the loss or to impose a penalty commensurate with the offender's actions. The relationship between law and justice is extremely complex, and what has been discussed above is only a simple understanding of the relationship between justice and law, and between law and justice.

The understanding of justice is different in each era, and therefore, the legislators in different eras have different understandings of the same phenomenon. Do you understand this explanation?

Summary. Fairness and justice are the common pursuit of human society, an important goal of the socialist rule of law, and the strong aspiration of the broad masses of the people in the new era. Achieving fairness and justice is an important task for building a harmonious socialist society. Safeguarding and realizing fairness and justice is the sacred duty of political and legal organs. Only by firmly establishing the concept of fairness and justice can political and legal cadres and police officers carry out the task of building a socialist country ruled by law as stipulated in the Constitution, truly safeguard the interests of the people, and promote the harmonious development of society.

In a nutshell, the realization of fairness and justice has been the consistent ideal of legal people throughout the ages, why.

Fairness and justice are the common pursuit of human society, an important goal of the socialist rule of law, and the strong aspiration of the broad masses of the people in the new era. Achieving fairness and justice is an important task for building a harmonious socialist society. Safeguarding and realizing fairness and justice is the sacred duty of political and legal organs. Only by firmly establishing the concept of fairness and justice can political and legal cadres and police officers carry out the task of building a socialist country ruled by law as stipulated in the Constitution, truly safeguard the interests of the people, and promote the harmonious development of society.

Career ideals are a historical category, why.

The professional ideal is a historical category, and its formation and development are premised on the development of the social productive forces and the division of labor, and develop along with the development of the social productive forces and the division of labor.

The pursuit of social fairness and justice and the care of the public welfare are not only requirements for judges, prosecutors, legal researchers, and educators, but also for lawyers, a profession that has become marketized.

Promoting social fairness and justice and enhancing people's well-being is the starting point and end point of comprehensively deepening reform, and it is also an important value orientation of the Communist Party of China in governing the country. Social equity is the eternal value goal pursued by human society, which is conducive to the development of society.

I wish you a happy life [love you] If you think it helps you, please click on the bottom left corner of the little hand that has worked hard to make a fortune! Thank you.