If there are missing items in the bill of quantities provided by the owner, what losses will be caus

If it is a fixed unit price contract, then during the construction process, the construction party can apply for a change to increase the amount of new work, which is generally more beneficial to the construction party, and there is no big loss to Party A, but the actual cost will exceed the budget price. If it is a fixed-price contract, then the construction party cannot apply for a change, and this part is the loss of the construction party.

There will be an impact and even a loss to each party, which is why audits exist.

1. Influence on the owner.

The quality of the project is the focus of the owner's attention to the project, if the quantity of the project is missing, it may lead to hidden dangers and defects in the project, which directly affects the quality of the project, although the owner saves the cost to a certain extent, but this saving is not desirable.

2. Loss of interests of the construction party.

There may be two situations in which there are missing items in the bill of quantities: one is that the project list is not counted but the actual construction is implemented, at this time, the construction party has invested more man-days but has not recovered the costs and benefits; However, the bill of quantities is not counted and the implementation is not implemented, in this case, if there is a problem in the project, the construction party will be held jointly and severally liable.

3. Influence on the designer.

It is conceivable that if there is a problem in the project, the design institute will be mainly responsible for the direct responsibility of the bill of quantities.

4. The influence of the supervising party.

The supervisory role of the supervision unit on the construction party is reflected here. If the supervisor does not find this error, it is the responsibility of the supervising party.

The work of all parties is to get the project done. So this problem should be avoided as much as possible.

1. For new bill of quantities items caused by missing items in the bill of quantities or design changes, the corresponding comprehensive unit price shall be proposed by the contractor and shall be used as the basis for settlement after confirmation by the employer.

2. If the quantity of the bill of quantities is wrong or the design change causes the increase or decrease of the quantity of the project, which is within the agreed range of the contract, the original comprehensive unit price shall be implemented; If it is beyond the scope agreed in the contract, it shall be used as the basis for settlement after confirmation by the employer.

Summary. Hello dear is happy to serve you, thank you for your patience. For new bill of quantities items caused by missing items in the bill of quantities or design changes, the corresponding comprehensive unit price shall be proposed by the contractor and shall be used as the basis for settlement after confirmation by the employer.

If the quantity of the bill of quantities is wrong or the design change causes the increase or decrease of the quantity of the project, which is within the range agreed in the contract, the original comprehensive unit price shall be implemented; If it is beyond the scope agreed in the contract, it shall be used as the basis for settlement after confirmation by the employer.

How to deal with missing items in the bill of quantities?

Hello dear is happy to serve you, thank you for your patience. For new bill of quantities items caused by missing items in the bill of quantities or design changes, the corresponding comprehensive unit price shall be submitted by the contractor, and the employer shall confirm that the new bill of quantities items shall be cleared as the basis for settlement. If the quantity of the bill of quantities is wrong or the design change causes the increase or decrease of the quantity of the project, which is within the range agreed in the contract, the original comprehensive such as the unit price shall be implemented; If it is beyond the scope agreed in the contract, it shall be used as the basis for settlement after confirmation by the employer.

I hope mine is helpful to you, I wish you a happy life, everything goes well, a smile is always open, a happy career, Changhong.

1.The drawings are not familiar.

After all, the personnel who compile the list have limited energy and experience, and it is impossible to grasp a large number of drawings one by one, resulting in the omission of individual projects on the drawings in the list. For example, the omission of an entire decorative item or the number of plasterboard ceilings in several classrooms is counted as only one of them.

2.Unfamiliar with the bidding documents and laws and regulations.

The bidding document is not a piece of paper, including various materials such as bidding drawings, lists, addenda, etc. Many of the measures or independent fees required by Party A are hidden in them, such as Party A requires Party B to complete the monitoring cost of the pile foundation or Party B to complete the fire protection air acceptance work after the completion of the project or Party B to bear the local tax fees and so on. These significant costs are often not shown in the drawings and are easily missed by the list.

3.Unfamiliar with construction technology, construction process or construction specifications.

In a checklist group item, multiple construction steps are included to complete multiple quota content or a construction process. In the compilation of the list, attention is often paid to the work content of a large amount of work, and the work content of a relatively small amount is omitted. For example, the prefabricated engineering pile is missing, and the geological conditions of Qingtan are very bad; For example, the design drawings specify the PE water supply pipe, and the PE water supply pipe cannot be exposed to the sun according to the specification, but it does not explain the protective measures to be adopted for the roof part.

In addition, when the quota does not conform to the specification, the specification shall prevail, because the specification shall prevail during acceptance.

1. All unreasonable. Once the contract is signed, it must be performed.

Missing items in the original list and new projects can be resolved in the form of project changes, but the contractor is in breach of contract if it does not perform the contract or sets preconditions under this excuse.

For cabling163, add:

1. First of all, the new project and the project in the contract are two different things, and whether the owner does the list or not has nothing to do with the performance of the project quantity in the contract. In other words, the quantity of work in the contract must be fulfilled regardless of whether the change has occurred.

2. If the items are missing from the original list, the normal situation is within the scope of the contract project, and the contractor has no right to refuse the change, even if the unit price has not been determined.

3. For new projects, if they are within the scope of the contract project, the contractor has no right to refuse the change, even if the unit price has not been determined. If the work is outside the scope of the contract, then the contractor may refuse or wait until the contract has been confirmed**.

Take a look at the "Construction Contract (Model Text)" or the FEDIC clause.

First of all, I personally think that this is a completely reasonable request, in fact, it should not be limited to the word "list", when the missing items or new additions (not the quantity of work), the employer must confirm that the contractor can only carry out the construction of the "additional part". It doesn't have to be a list, it can be a technology change, a visa, etc. If this is a condition and the part of the contract is refused, it should be unreasonable, but if the part is increased, the execution of the contract will be affected.

For example, if the designed pipeline does not match the actual situation and cannot achieve the design requirements, then the contractor's requirements are reasonable. act-wxp forgot that if the contract is executed, it is likely that the system will not work or the house will collapse? Let's analyze the specific situation on a case-by-case basis.

Try not to bid below cost**.

The fact that construction enterprises bid below cost is not conducive to the principle of fair and just competition advocated by the Bidding and Bidding Law. What's more serious is that winning the bid at a price lower than the cost price will inevitably lead to the construction personnel cutting corners and shoddy in the process of contract implementation, resulting in problems and hidden dangers in construction quality and safety, and greatly increasing the possibility of rolling disputes with the employer.

Of course, in practice, some construction enterprises for performance or long-term interests and other considerations, to the cost price or close to the cost price of the first bid, this is completely understandable, but should be based on the premise of ensuring the quality of the project, ensuring the safety of construction, and ensuring that it does not endanger the public interest.

Many construction companies have this idea, that is, in any case, they will win the bid at a low price first, and then carry out a second operation after entering the construction site, and increase profits by changing and adding visas. This so-called "loss in the embankment and compensation outside the embankment" thinking and practice is extremely risky, after all, it is led by the other party, if not handled properly, it is likely that the bigger the project is done, the more losses will be lost, and some of the actual construction of the project will be "picked" halfway, which is the case.