This is antimatter!? 2006 .

Matter is mostly made up of molecules, which are made up of atoms, which in turn are made up of nuclei and electrons. Inside the atom, the electrons rotate incessantly and revolve around the nucleus. Both of these motions of electrons produce magnetism.

But in most matter, the direction of electron movement is varied and chaotic, and magnetic effects cancel each other out. Therefore, most substances are not magnetic under normal conditions. Antimatter is matter that is made up of antiparticles.

All particles have antiparticles, and these antiparticles are characterized by their mass, lifetime, spin, and isospin being the same as the corresponding particles, but the quantum numbers such as charge, baryon number, lepton, singular number, etc., are the opposite.

For example, a hydrogen atom is made up of a negatively charged electron and a positively charged proton, while an antihydrogen atom is the opposite, consisting of a positively charged positron and a negatively charged antiproton. When matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate, releasing a large amount of energy.

Scientists believe that the creation of a large number of antihydrogen atoms will help verify the correctness of the CPT conservation assumption and the universality of the Standard Model of the universe. If it is found that antihydrogen atoms and hydrogen atoms are not exactly equivalent in physical laws, it will bring very important new enlightenment to some fundamental problems in physics and cosmology. For example, the Great Theory of the Universe holds that when the universe was born, an equal amount of matter and antimatter was created from nothingness.

But in the observed universe, matter is clearly absolutely dominant. The study of antihydrogen atoms may help to solve this mystery. Matter and antimatter have opposite charges, and when they meet, they produce a huge amount of energy.

In 1930, the British physicist Dirac proposed that there are two kinds of electrons, in addition to negatively charged electrons, there are positively charged electrons, these two charges happen to be positive and negative, negatively charged electrons are called positrons, and positively charged electrons are called antielectrons.

For a long time, it was believed that there was only one electron, so Dirac's prophecy was skeptical. Unexpectedly, two years later, Dirac's prediction was confirmed, and the American physicist Anderson really discovered the antielectron in the laboratory.

In 1955, antiprotons were discovered in a laboratory in the United States, and later.

Antineutrons have been discovered. By the 60s of the last century, antiparticles among elementary particles.

Almost all of them were found.

Scientists believe that there is "antimatter" in the universe that we cannot see or touch.

world", its basic properties are the opposite of the world around us. Antimatter atoms.

The nucleus is a "negative nucleus" made up of antiprotons and antineutrons, surrounded by positrons. Antimatter.

Once in contact with the "positive matter" of our world, it will happen in an instant**, matter and.

Antimatter becomes a photon or meson, releasing a huge amount of energy and producing the phenomenon of "annihilation".

So far, the scientific community has not figured out the nature of electricity and magnetism, but do you think the force in the magnet is antimatter and matter, or the force that antimatter and antimatter want to attract? This is impossible, not to mention annihilation, for antimatter and antimatter, like matter and matter, do not attract each other for no reason (except for gravitation, which cannot produce a force as large as magnetism with such a small mass and volume). Antimatter and matter may indeed attract each other, but we are surrounded by matter, so why do magnets attract only iron, cobalt, and nickel and not other substances?

In conclusion, there can be no antimatter in a magnet.!

Quite right. Oxygen in magnets exists in antimatter form.

Nonsense !! Magnetic force is essentially an electric field force, and electromagnetic unity——— which is confirmed by modern physics, and the magnetic force in the magnet is of course caused by electrons, is there any doubt.

Besides, if it's caused by antimatter, isn't it annihilation?

Antimatter annihilates when it touches matter.

There can be no antimatter in a magnet.

Magnets are magnetic because the electrons are all rotating in one direction.

The movement of electrons produces a magnetic field, only to have magnetism, if there is really antimatter, when it touches the positive matter, it will annihilate and release energy, so many magnets on the earth, if there is antimatter in it, the energy released by annihilation has already leveled the earth.

The electrons of antimatter are positively charged, and the protons are negatively charged. Once it encounters matter, it will be annihilated.

It is not the electrons in a magnet that affect magnetism.

Who told you that?

The regular movement of electrons produces magnetism, which is molecular current.

Antimatter collides and annihilation!

Let's go back to Mars.

The earth is dangerous.

Alas...

Fools, do you know what antimatter is?

People who know nothing are the most terrible.

What is the definition of antimatter.

I'm not going to score it, but I'll take a moment to explain it to you.

After the universe is large, a huge amount of energy is released, and this energy is matter, that is, particles, there are positive particles and antiparticles, they collide with each other, but the uncertainty principle of quantum theory shows that there is no such thing as perfection in the universe, so C (positive and negative particle reversal) P (take the mirror image) T (take the time inversion, that is, the point to the direction of motion) joint symmetry is established, and the microscopic scale cp joint symmetry does not hold, that is, T symmetry fails, so that the antiparticle can become a positive particle in a high-energy environment, The opposite process is also allowed, but the laws of physics are not exactly the same for positive particles and antiparticles, so a small number of particles remain after the positive and negative particles are extinguished, and we can never even figure out whether the residual particles are positive particles or antiparticles (if the residual particles are antiparticles, we can just reverse the name, this is just a man-made name), these residual positive particles are also positive matter with positive energy to form galaxies and ourselves, In the absence of human interference, only antimatter existed at the beginning of the universe (with the exception of black holes). With the development of science, human beings' curiosity about the elementary particles of all things is becoming more and more intense, so generations of high-energy particle colliders continue to accelerate the proton beam to collide in order to be able to see smaller (because the higher the energy, the smaller we can detect), and at the same time, the high enough energy can simulate the microscopic approximate environment of the universe, which is the positive particles under high energy to become antiparticles, that is, antimatter, but once the antimatter comes into contact with the positive energy of the positive matter, it will immediately cancel out with the positive energy. There is no way to capture at will, there is no way and clue to solve this problem at present, which will also be the biggest technical barrier to the realization of space-time in the future, if there can be a continuous negative energy area and enough space-time curl, you can shuttle in three-dimensional time (light will deflect when passing through a large energy (mass) object, which proves that space can be curled as long as the energy is large enough). Black holes are the most bizarre phenomenon in nature, and the huge energy generated by black holes makes all the laws of physics collapse the moment they reach the singularity, so everything is possible there, including, of course, antimatter.

The conclusion is that antimatter has existed in black holes (only theoretically), but that the current form of human thought has no hope of accessing and exploiting them, even though they are so attractive and have high application value.

Antimatter is real (e.g., particles have opposite charges to antiparticles, and everything else that can be reversed is opposite).

Antimatter can be stored in special electromagnetic containers. When positive matter comes into contact with antimatter, it annihilates and emits high-energy photons or gamma rays. Antimatter is the most powerful source of energy known to mankind.

It releases energy with 100% efficiency (the chance of nuclear fission is 1.5 percent). Antimatter does not pollute and does not produce radiation, and a small drop of antimatter can sustain the kinetic energy of the entire city of New York throughout the day. Don't be overly optimistic, there is a ...... of crisis hidden in itAntimatter is extremely unstable, and it can turn anything it comes into contact with into ashes ......Even the air is no exception.

Just one gram of antimatter is equivalent to the energy of a 200,000-ton nuclear bomb – more than 2,000 times more powerful than the atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima. When matter comes into contact with antimatter, the outermost electrons of the atom cancel each other out because of the opposite charge, and the protons in the nucleus cancel each other out for the same reason, while the antineutron collides strongly with the neutron due to its magnetic opposite, emitting amazing energy. Albert Einstein calculated this complete rate of energy release, and nuclear fission is as insignificant as striking a safety match compared to this complete energy release.

Antimatter is an imaginary form of matter, and in particle physics, antimatter is an extension of the concept of antiparticles, which are made up of antiparticles, just as ordinary matter is made of ordinary particles.

The combination of matter and antimatter is like the combination of particles and antiparticles, causing both to annihilate and thus emitting high-energy photons or gamma rays.

According to a report released on November 17, 2010 in the British journal Nature**, European researchers have successfully "caught" trace amounts of antimatter for the first time in the history of science.

On the first floor, except for the first sentence, there is nothing wrong with it.

Antimatter is not imaginary, but can exist.