The poor get poorer and the rich get richer, is it a pseudo law or a historical law?

It is the law of history, after all, people themselves are relatively rich, do things that poor people dare not think of, and now there is financial management, just put the money there, and you can have an income without doing anything for a day.

It should be a law of history that the poor get poorer and the rich get richer. But this law does not include everyone. Because the rich have the capital to do something bigger. The poor have no capital and can only work to earn money.

The so-called "rich people are richer" means that this rich person will be rich in the future on the basis of wealth. Because he has a rich foundation, this rich foundation can allow him to get more resources, platforms, visions, knowledge, contacts and so on that more poor people can't get, and these things can allow him to create more wealth. Therefore, "the poor are poorer" is also a principle, the resources that these rich people have are not easy for the poor to obtain through hard work, but because they are poor (they can't afford to study, have no education, no resources, and no opportunity for trial and error), it will be more difficult for the value they can create to reach the threshold of wealth.

The rich are getting richer and richer, and the poor will be getting poorer and poorer, there is a certain truth in this saying, the rich have a lot of money, and he can invest in any industry or business to develop and grow his wealth!Rich people will make themselves richer and richer in the process of investment development!And the poor have no funds to invest, the poor can only rely on part-time jobs or small businesses to survive, the poor have very few opportunities to make money, and the poor can only get poorer and poorer!

The law of history is that the rich can take out a sum of money to invest in a business at will, and it doesn't matter if they lose money, but the poor are different, investment is a kind of risk for them, if they lose money, they will have nothing and go bankrupt, so the poorer the poor, the richer the richer.

There is an element of luck between rich and poor, but it is fundamentally an ideology!In addition, now a family has a good job, and the whole family is mostly ordinary workers, and the gap between the rich and the poor will be widened in the future, and sometimes from time to time I can save much money without consumption, the most important thing is to earn more. However, if you have more money and less money, you will live 24 hours a day, which requires a good mood, good health, and people with little money can still live a happy and happy life.

The poor get poorer and the rich get richer, and this is a historical law that has a certain basis.

People who run enterprises often say that they have money, at this time they may not really have much wealth, but they can take advantage of this fame to go out and do things conveniently, Chinese like icing on the cake, slowly they have to seize the opportunity to do a good job will become really rich. The so-called poor people have outdated concepts, they don't have much money in their pockets, they don't dare to invest, they can't see it in one year or two years, and when they look back in ten years, they will find that there is a big gap with others. Confident people, their investment is to sell water, and the big river is full of money, and the so-called poor people's investment is that if I fail, this money will fall into the water and will not come back.

It's a fundamental law, because the difference between the ideas of the poor and the rich is too great, and the way of accumulating wealth is too different!

It is the result of the priority of the efficiency of the social system and the priority of capital. When equity is prioritized, the gap between rich and poor narrows. No matter how much the rich make and pay most of their taxes, it is impossible for them to get richer and richer. ‍‍

Doing business knows that we need capital, this sentence can be understood as, the rich have more capital, the poor have less capital, more capital will bring more benefits, less capital will produce less benefits, of course, there is no absolute steady profit and no loss.

I have the impression that many people have said this sentence, and this sentence has several meanings that need to be understood. Poor and rich are a pair of relative words, to put it bluntly, it is the difference between the rich and the rich, the rich and the poor are relative, and the person who has 100,000 is also poor compared to the person who has 1 million.

In fact, the poorer the poorer, the reason is because they don't have the guts and brains, and the rich have the opportunity to invest and dare to do, so they will get richer and richer.

The Matthew effect refers to the phenomenon of the strong getting stronger and the weak getting weaker.

It is widely used in social psychology, education, and finance.

It belongs to the field of finance and science. The Matthew effect, a term commonly used by sociologists and economists, reflects a social phenomenon of polarization, with the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. The name comes from a parable in the New Testament of Matthew, Bible:

and whosoever hath it, he shall be given twice as much, that he may be superfluous; and if he does not, he shall take all that he has." The "Matthew effect" is contrary to the "way of balance"; Similar to the "28th Rule", it is a very important law of nature. The ancient Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu once put forward a similar idea:

The way of heaven is to make up for the deficiency when there is more than is lost. The way of man is not, the loss is not enough to give more than enough. ”

The Matthew effect means that the strong get stronger and the weak get weaker.

The Matthew effect comes.

There is a story in the New Testament Gospel of Matthew that before he went on a long journey, a king gave three servants a mina of silver each, and said, "Go and do business, and when I return, come back to me."

When the king returned, the first servant said, "Master, I have earned ten minas for the mina you gave me." So the king rewarded him with 10 cities.

The second servant reported: "Master, for every mina you gave me, I have earned five minas." So the king rewarded him with five cities.

The third servant reported: "Master, I have been wrapping the one ingot of silver you have given me in a handkerchief, and I have not taken it out for fear of losing it." So the king commanded that the third servant's mina of silver should be given to the first, saying:

and whosoever hath little, even what he has, shall be taken from him. And to him that is in abundance, that he may be as much as he is good. This is the Matthew effect, and it reflects a common phenomenon in today's society, which is winner-takes-all.

There is a big difference between the poor and the rich!

The rich are rich because they have a lot of money, and the poor are called poor because they have no money or little money.

There are three levels of earning:

It is very tiring and limited to work for others to earn money by relying on one's own labor (mental power + physical strength), and it is difficult to get rid of poverty;

The level of earning money is slightly higher, but it requires a certain amount of primitive accumulation, and there is considerable risk;

Earning money with power and access is the most clever - it requires public relations skills (interest swaps) and connections.

The serious uneven distribution of social resources, the irrational distribution system, and the lack of adjustment means and ability (inaction or reluctance to act) eventually lead to the poor getting poorer and the rich getting richer.

In fact, there are many factors, on the surface, I think the idea is different, the ambition of the poor is not very big, and the rich dare to innovate, dare to challenge, make money with money, and there is fate, but even if we are poor, we must work hard, don't be afraid of failure, and the most important thing is to be content, contentment and happiness... Good luck.

The Matthew Effect, the Law of Twenty-Eight. In fact, it has to do with people's mentality and courage. Some people have ideas but don't have the courage, and some people have the courage but don't have the ideas.

In the end, nothing can be done. When you have ideas, at the same time, you have the courage to dare to break for your dreams, and you are not afraid of failure, have a resolute mentality, and have to fail again and again!

There are many reasons, but there are two points. First, the interests of the social system are biased in favor of certain groups, resulting in some people getting poorer and others getting richer. Second, the ideological concepts of the mass group, the humanistic ideas of the society, etc., such as the concept of financial management, knowledge level, pioneering spirit, etc.

The distribution system is not reasonable, and the poor have no way to rise.

The first reason: only focus on the gains and losses of the moment, because they can't afford to wait.

Children from poor families are sensible early, so after they earn money from social work, they will generally find ways to send money home to improve the life of their families, which is also their original intention to make money.

Generally speaking, in wealthier families, children can only feel the difficulty of life when they go out to work in society; But the children of poor families, from the very beginning, have borne all kinds of burdens from the family. In layman's terms, if they don't farm in the first half of the year, they may not have rice to eat in the second half of the winter.

The second reason: the lack of help and guidance from noble people.

Wealthy families will accumulate their network resources from generation to generation, so the descendants of the wealthy can often have higher starting conditions.

Moreover, children from wealthy families, at the critical juncture of their lives, if they have a few points of guidance from a master, they are likely to change their lives; But the children of poor families, they have no superior guidance, and their parents cannot give them reliable advice, so they can only continue to explore and move forward on their own.

The third reason: children from poor families can't afford to lose.

Many people say that as long as the poor have the courage to explore, even if they continue to experience failure, they will also have a great chance of success after accumulating rich industry experience.

But in real life, although the children of poor families work very hard, they regret that they can't afford to make mistakes, and they can't afford to make mistakes.

Poor: A person who enjoys plenty of time is unlikely to make a lot of money, and if he wants to be leisurely and relaxed, he will lose more opportunities to earn money. The time of the poor is worthless, sometimes even redundant, and they don't know how to pass the time and how to mix it up so that they don't get annoyed.

If you can be annoyed that you spent an extra dime on a pound of cabbage, but not be heartbroken for wasting the day, this is typical poor thinking.

Rich: No matter how a person earns money, no matter how much money is earned, it must be accumulated over time. The play of the rich is also a way of working, with a purpose.

The rich are idle, idle in the body, self-cultivation, in order to fight again, and the head is not idle for a moment; The poor man is idle, idle in thinking, he is busy with his hands and feet, busy going to the mahjong table to touch a few more.

Chinese society is very realistic. You don't have the capital. It's hard to do business.

What the rich have is capital. Doing business is sure to be successful. So the poor are getting poorer and poorer.

The rich are getting richer and richer. If this situation continues. Sooner or later, it will cause public outrage.

Both the poor and the rich have the opportunity to get rich, both have the way to start a business, and the poor can withstand suffering better than the rich, but why are the poor poor? Because he couldn't believe that such and such an opportunity had been lost in vain. Why don't you dare to believe it, because the current TV, Tianchai leaks 315, and quality reports are all telling the increasingly serious behavior of social dishonesty.

The capital of the poor is very low, and for the sake of the upbringing of future generations, they can only live cautiously, for fear that the business will enter the fake goods and find no place to seek justice.

So the poorer the poorer.

Everyone says that there is no traitor and no business. But is that really the case? Are those companies with a reputation for repentance all cheated? Otherwise, enterprises that can be passed down from generation to generation all adhere to the principle of one word, that is, "faith".

A man cannot stand without faith. It is difficult for a person to gain a foothold without credit, but we cannot say that the poor have no credit. Yes, but others don't know. How do you show your integrity in front of others?

The most important point is to dare to believe in others, a person who dares to believe in others, in order to make people feel trustworthy, this is a beginning of their own trust, with communication, you can have the opportunity to promise, only to have the opportunity to fulfill the promise, in order to make your credit like "Ji Bu" like "a promise of gold".