If Sima Yi of the Three Kingdoms was to serve Liu Chan, would he replace Liu Chan?

Yes. Because a person like Cao Rui who is proficient in the art of the emperor can't restrain him, let alone a mediocre master like Liu Chan.

At that time, it was estimated that Sima was already in charge.

If you kill the surrenderer, you don't want to think about who would dare to surrender to you. And Liu Chan was "happy", and there was no threat.

Let me explain my understanding:

First of all, I have questions about your question, Cao Cao's surviving sons are: Cao Pi, Cao Zhi, Cao Zhang, Cao Xiong, I don't need to explain too much about these four people, Cao Pi succeeded to the throne, Cao Zhi was demoted to the end of his life, Cao Zhang gave up his military power and died of old age, and Cao Xiong was so frightened that he committed suicide after Cao Pi succeeded to the throne. How could Cao Cao have a son who defected to Shu?

I think the landlord should want to ask, Liu Chan's son. Because it is true that Adou has a son: Liu Kan, the king of the Northland, when Adou wanted to gg, he swore not to surrender, ran to Liu Bei's temple and cried, and committed suicide after going home and killing his wife and children.

Then take 10,000 steps back, even if the problem of LZ is true, Cao Cao's son should be Cao Huan's second or third uncle in terms of generation, and it is basically a relationship that can't be beaten by eight poles (it is estimated that they have never met), such a person is nothing to him. The brother upstairs also said that Cao Huan's own life was in the hands of Sima at that time, so what right did he have to decide the life and death of others. And Sima's life is because he is "happy" and has no ambitions.

And Adou is really stupid and cute, whether it's pretending to be or it's real, would you kill someone who knows how to eat, drink and have fun laughing all day long.

There is also a small reminder, Sima Yi basically did not think about the usurpation of the throne, his ambition is to do his best to do things for the world, although Cao Wei's world has no meaning, but Sima Yi has no idea about being the emperor, which is different from Cao Cao's back then. Therefore, the people who deliberately plotted against Wei were Sima Shi and Sima Zhao, their ideas were the same as Cao Cao's, and their practices were basically the same.

First of all, Cao Wei was already a puppet of the Sima family at that time, and this problem was transformed into the problem of Sima not killing Liu Chan. First, Liu Chan failed to return to Shu after surrendering, (see the allusion to "Happy and Unhappy Shu" for details,) which greatly reduced the possibility of Liu Chan's rebellion, and second, although Liu Chan did a good job of concentrating on the monarch eleven years after Zhuge died, his talents were limited after all, and it was not enough for Sima to worry.

Hello According to historical records, Sima Yi rebelled in the first ten years (that is, in 249 AD), at that time Cao Cao's sons had already passed away, where did the surrender of Shu Han said, if you want to say that there is one surrender, that is, Xiahou Ba, the son of Xiahou Yuan, Cao Cao's clan.

At this time, it was the Sima family who was in charge, and in the four hundred years of the Han Dynasty, the influence was still great.

At that time, it was not his Cao family who was in charge of the Wei State.

Because Emperor Wei Yuan likes Liu Chan, it's obvious that he is in love with beauty.

Which son of Cao Cao surrendered to Shu Han?

There is no right for the emperor to speak, just like Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty.

Same question: Why did Sima Yi take refuge in Liu Bei?

Someone else asked me, why didn't Zhou Yu take refuge in Liu Bei? I told him, do you know what it means that a small temple can't hold a big immortal?

Similarly. What is Liu Bei's background and strength, you can see what the background of Sima Yi and Zhou Yu is, and see what Cao Cao's strength is.

Don't be fooled by the romance.

1.The strength is different. Cao Cao's Liu Bei ran around, and Liu Bei didn't even have a foundation at all (in front of Chibi), I guess no one would choose a boss who has no future in front of him, although he may be developed in the future.

2.Cao Liu's background was different, and his background was very important in the gate valve system at that time. Although Liu Bei is a descendant of the royal family, there were more royal families at that time, and there was no difference between him and ordinary people; Cao Cao is different, he has a good background and is from a family of eunuchs.

2.The geography is also different. The Sima family is a wealthy family in the north, and Liu Bei occupies the land of Shu. Could it be that he became a vote for Liu Bei and moved his family south. Moreover, Cao Cao also threatened Sima Yi with the Sima family, so Sima Yi would not take refuge in Liu Bei.

Because of Zhuge Liang, the so-called one mountain cannot accommodate two tigers.

Why! Don't be fooled by the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Shu has no ability to confront Wei at all, Shu is the weakest among the Three Kingdoms, if you want to understand history, look at the Three Kingdoms!

The question should be:

Why did Sima Yi take refuge in Liu Bei.

Because Liu Bei's power is not as strong as Cao Cao.

In order for Sima Zhao to be able to obtain power justifiably, Liu Chan will not compete for power, so he will keep it with peace of mind.

Because Liu Chan is very peaceful, he will not take the initiative to stir up trouble, nor will he see any other thoughts, which makes Sima Zhao feel very relieved.

Because Liu Chan didn't have the ambition of wolf Zihuai at that time, and he couldn't pose any threat to Sima Zhao now, Sima Zhao did this in order to make his reputation better.