Cao Cao? Zhuge Liang? Sima Yi? Which one is better in the Three Kingdoms, Sima Yi or Zhuge Liang?

Cao Cao: Waiting for the will of heaven means that it doesn't matter if you are the emperor or not, you can be the emperor if you have the opportunity, and you are content if you don't have the opportunity to be a prime minister; But we must grasp the power of the court, and we must leave some fruits for future generations.

Zhuge Liang: He has no interest in being the emperor, his dream is just to revive the Han Dynasty, in fact, although he has made great achievements, but firstly, in order to preserve his loyalty, and secondly, he is entrusted by Liu Bei, thanks to the grace of Zhiba, and does not intend to usurp the throne. Otherwise, with Liu Chan's ability, how could he beat Zhuge Liang?

Monarchy and prime power have always been a key point in the struggle for political power, and Cao Cao's phase was snatched by himself, and he was the real boss. Poor Zhuge Liang is also working hard to help the world, but there is also a black-bellied Uncle Liu Huang above. The difference between Zhuge Liang and Sima Yi is that Zhuge Liang doesn't seem to have a particularly competitive son, and Sima Yi has two good sons.

Sima Yi is a father and son soldier, and he can still teach his children when he fights, and he is not afraid of psychological grievances. It's a pity that Zhuge Liang worked hard to bring a group of minions to the soldiers, and it is no wonder that this commander came and that commanded to death.

Sima Yi was a lieutenant at the beginning and had military power. Later, although the official position was high, the military power was gone. In the end, he pretended to be sick and killed Cao Xiu.

Win the world. Personally, I think he is a very deep yin owl villain. Just want to usurp power.

Cao Cao saw his plot and wanted to kill him. But he had an excellent relationship with Cao Pi. Cao Pi defended him many times.

Cao Cao first devoted himself to maintaining the Han Dynasty, but when he saw that the Han family could not be restored, he began to plan for himself.

Zhuge Liang really did his best and died. Knowing that the latter is a mediocre talent, he still does not forget the grace of the first emperor. Wholeheartedly repay the kindness of the first emperor and the grass house.

Moral realm: Zhuge Liang is greater than Cao Cao and greater than Sima Yi.

In fact, Sima Yi and Cao Cao's rights are similar in the end Well, the two of them have one thing in common is that they have not been emperors Zhuge Liang can't say usurping Shu If you want to usurp it, it's really a backhand It can only be said that Zhuge Liang's life will be ruined by Liu Bei's words Otherwise, with Zhuge Liang's temperament, it is probably unlikely that he will continue to assist Liu Chan, but hide, so why not go out of Qishan and break the soul of Wuzhang Yuan.

It can't be said that it is exactly the same. But there are similarities. Cao Cao didn't take the emperor seriously at all.

And I don't know Emperor Xian's father. And Zhuge Liang and Liu Bei are brothers. That's one of them.

The background is different. 2.Emperor Xian did not personally say that Cao Cao would act as his representative.

And Liu Bei said it himself before he died. This is the second one. 3.

Sima Yi and Cao Cao are very similar. All are the founders of a dynasty.

It seems that Cao Cao did not usurp the Han, it was Cao Cao's son Cao Pi who usurped the Han and became the emperor to establish the Wei State, and Zhuge Liang did not usurp Shu! So how can a faithful person be! Although Liu Bei Tuogu in the White Emperor City told him that he could replace him if necessary, Xiao Zhu is very righteous!

As for Sima Yi, he did not usurp Wei, but he made the Sima family grasp the power of Wei in his later years through power techniques! It was later Sima Yi's grandson Sima Yan who usurped Wei and became emperor to establish the Jin Dynasty. If there is anything wrong, please advise!

Zhuge is a rare politician who has his own political dream - the revival of the Han Dynasty. Cao Cao's ideal when he was young was to raise his power. After becoming the prime minister, he was very disgusted with the corrupt Han royal family and the power of the scholar clan attached to the royal family, suppressed the scholar clan in every possible way, supported the poor scholars, and ruled the northern officials for a clear time.

Zhuge Liang can't say usurpation. Cao Cao, who contributed to the Han family, and his son usurped the Han.

Zhuge Liang, who was credited to Shu Han, died in battle.

Sima Yi is credited to Wei, and his grandson Sima Yan usurped Wei.

Similarities between the three people:

1. Didn't become an emperor.

2. They are very smart, can fight, and know how to make good use of people.

3. They all assume the role of the phase.

The use of the word "usurpation" is inaccurate, and the so-called usurpation of power refers to the overthrow of the old forces.

Historical figures should be evaluated mainly by their actions, not by their controversial thoughts.

Cao Cao, who contributed to the Han family, and his son usurped the Han.

Zhuge Liang, who was credited to Shu Han, died in battle.

Sima Yi is credited to Wei, and his grandson Sima Yan usurped Wei.

All three of them are strategists.

The similarity lies in their use of government and power.

The explanation of thick black is that Cao Cao is only black but not thick, Zhuge Liang is not black and not thick, and Sima Yi is black and thick.

Deduction and history are not the same.

Many people feel that Luo Guanzhong is more biased towards Liu Bei's group in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", so there is an over-exaggeration of people such as Liu Bei, Guan Yu, Zhao Yun, Zhuge Liang, etc., prompting them to become too good. In fact, in my opinion, Luo Guanzhong still has many places that combine history, so his description of Sima Yi is also more exciting.

In Luo Guanzhong's pen, Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang actually have a lot of wits and courage, such as the most classic empty city plan, which is the best embodiment of the two people's battle of wits and courage, many people feel that in the empty city plan, Sima Yi was fooled by Zhuge Liang, and Zhuge Liang defeated Sima Yi in strategy.

In fact, this is just a superficial view, if we study it deeply, in fact, it is not difficult to find that there is a deeper meaning in the empty city plan, did Sima Yi really not realize that Zhuge Liang was fooling himself at that time? In my opinion, Sima Yi is not so ignorant.

Sima Yi obviously saw Zhuge Liang's plan, but he wanted to plan and lead the troops away, why would Sima Yi do this? The main reason is that Sima Yi had just gained the trust of Cao Wei Group at that time, but the foundation was still unstable, only Zhuge Liang still existed, Sima Yi's value would be more obvious, if Zhuge Liang was destroyed, Sima Yi's existence would be unnecessary.

In other words, at this time, Sima Yi was ostensibly fooled by Zhuge Liang, but in fact, he was looking for a way out for his future and acting in partnership with Zhuge Liang, so purely from the perspective of the empty city plan, we can't compare who is more powerful between the two, but this does not mean that we can't compare who is more powerful between the two.

If Luo Guanzhong really distinguishes the victory or defeat of Sima Yi and Zhuge Liang, it should be after Zhuge Liang put the seven-star lantern and died under the influence of Wei Yan, when Zhuge Liang understood that his life had come to an end, he arranged for Jiang Wei and others to put themselves in their seats and carry Zhuge Liang away, so that Sima Yi could not see that Zhuge Liang had died.

Sima Yi wanted to lead the army to attack Zhuge Liang at that time, but he saw Zhuge Liang sitting in his seat from a distance, and he seemed to be very calm, so Sima Yi thought that Zhuge Liang was still alive, so he was fooled into letting go of the Shu Han army and allowing them to go home.

Judging from this simple matter, in fact, Sima Yi is still far behind Zhuge Liang in all aspects of ability, so he will continue to fall into Zhuge Liang's schemes, it can be said that if we combine the many details of the entire "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", Zhuge Liang is indeed slightly better than Sima Yi in terms of ability.

Both have their advantages.

Zhuge Liang is good at politics, and in terms of military talent, he is also the chief of the army and the use of soldiers for his short, and he is more wise. Sima Yi's military talent is better than Zhuge Liang, he can write and martial arts, and he praises Zhuge Liang as a genius in the world in terms of military governance, but he himself is not inferior to Zhuge Liang. For the prediction and grasp of the situation in the world, Zhuge Liang is obviously better; However, the use of soldiers as generals can pay attention to "Zhengqi", and this talent Zhuge Liang is not as good as Sima Yi.

There is no doubt that Wen Tao and Cao Cao are the most powerful, and they are not only military strategists, politicians, but also writers and calligraphers in historical evaluation.

Although Zhuge Liang and Sima Yi can also be called politicians and military strategists, compared with all aspects, the achievements in politics, literature, calligraphy and other aspects, Liang and Yi are far inferior to Cao Cao.

In terms of military affairs, Cao Cao's achievements in conquering the Quartet, eliminating the separatist forces such as Eryuan, Lü Bu, Liu Biao, Ma Chao, and Han Sui internally, and subjugating the Southern Xiongnu, Wuhuan, and Xianbei externally, and unifying northern China were beyond the reach of the two of them.

Sometimes, we are forced to take the path we can't choose, until one day we realize that we should find our voice.

Zhuge Liang, the other two people have many shortcomings in human nature, but Zhuge does not.

Each has its own merits and should not be conflated.

Cao Cao, in the end, he ruled the world.