Internet celebrity live broadcast pumping and catching fish caused netizens to question and was repo

Official response: The water extracted by the Internet celebrity is not a natural water but the behavior is inappropriate, and the education has been criticized.

Such live broadcasts of Internet celebrities pumping water and catching fish can often be seen, which has aroused the curiosity and onlookers of some people, but this time it was reported by volunteers really beyond everyone's cognition, and it also changed everyone's cognition, which is generally a good thing.

There are relevant provisions on the crime of illegal fishing of aquatic products in China's criminal law, of which Article 340 explains that in violation of the laws and regulations on the protection of aquatic resources, fishing aquatic products in prohibited areas, fishing ban periods or using prohibited tools and methods, if the circumstances are serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or fine. Fishing with ground cages is suspected of the crime of illegal fishing of aquatic products, and may be sentenced to corresponding penalties according to the severity of the circumstances.

After receiving the report from the volunteers, the relevant law enforcement officers of the Aquatic and Fishery Service Center of the Fushun County Agriculture and Rural Bureau immediately rushed to the scene to investigate and verify, and then found that the waters extracted by the Internet celebrity did not belong to natural waters, but a small ditch in the rural collective land.

This is the end of the matter, but the incident has once again aroused everyone's thinking.

Secondly: such incidents are also a warning to other similar influencers, hoping that they will relent.

There are not a few live broadcasts of pumping fishing, and some even pump water to fish in waterholes by the sea, but fishermen who live by the sea know that there are basically no fish in those waterholes, and the so-called pumping fishing is just a well-planned live broadcast with a performance nature. This incident just warns this type of Internet celebrity that sooner or later the routine will be recognized, so let's take the right path.

For such bad behavior, the first person to stand up and report it means that someone has begun to boycott such a live broadcast method, and it has also played a certain role in improving the follow-up Internet celebrity ecology.

Officials deemed the behavior inappropriate. Because if it is a natural water, it is suspected of violating the law, but even if it is not this kind of eye-catching practice, it is inappropriate and environmentally friendly.

Officials criticized the act, publicly explaining that the act was very inappropriate, and called on everyone not to follow suit.

Officials said that although the area where the Internet celebrity pumped water to catch fish was not natural waters, his behavior was still inappropriate, and he has been criticized for education.

No, but this kind of behavior of live streaming will cause people to follow suit, so it's better not to do it.

No, because the place where he fished was a small ditch, which belonged to the rural collective, it did not constitute an illegal act.

According to the official response, it does not constitute an illegal act.

On the afternoon of December 29, 2020, Douyin user "Rural Brother Kidnapping", who has more than 1.6 million followers, was reported as "suspected of fishing in natural waters" in a live online broadcast of pumping water to catch fish. After on-site investigation and verification by local fishery administration and law enforcement personnel, the scene of pumping and catching fish is only a small ditch within the scope of rural collective land, which does not belong to natural waters, so there is no illegal act. However, his behavior of pumping water to catch fish was improper, and he has been publicized and criticized and educated on laws and regulations.

I think such an act has constituted a violation of the law and must bear legal responsibility.

The anchor pumped water to catch fish and reported it to the volunteers, but he brazenly told the volunteers that this is an unregulated water area and is not subject to legal control, and now many Internet celebrities rely on these vulgar behaviors to win the attention of the audience. In order to be able to earn profits, attract the attention of the public, and aspire to become rich overnight. The anchor rushes the water to catch fish, this matter is already an unreasonable behavior, this is destroying the balance of the biological chain, children know what to do and don't do everything, don't you an adult understand the truth of fishing with all your might?

If you want to rely on these vulgar behaviors to do live broadcasts to win the attention of the audience, then how many people do you think will continue to ** your live broadcasts?

Vulgar behaviorThe vulgar behavior of the anchor should not be suitable for the interface of the live broadcast in the first place, and these vulgar behaviors will not only bring some bad effects to teenagers. It is in the stage of establishing three views, establishing a good view of right and wrong, and a cognition of various things, and I am ** live broadcast of some teenagers, so what kind of image does this behavior obtain the psychology of teenagers? They will be the pillars of the country in the future, and their behavior will be the image of the country in the future, and we can't set a good example for them at this moment, so what will they become in the future?

I don't dare to think about it, and I don't dare to think about it too much, is it that these Internet celebrities rely on vulgar behavior to attract attention, so that our juniors have to bear the consequences?

Unreasonable behavior is already wrong behavior in this regard. Children know not to harm small animals, to protect the environment, don't adults have such a cognition? I think this is an irrational act in itself, it has upset the balance of the ecological chain and the food chain, and it is wrong.

It is a bad behavior to rely on vulgar behavior to attract attention, and it sets a bad example for teenagers. It's their fault, but they know their mistakes and make mistakes, destroying the balance of the ecological chain and destroying nature and the environment. That's the worst.

The reason why many Internet celebrities rely on vulgar behaviors to attract attention is because often the public wants to do some vulgar behaviors in their hearts, but because of moral and other restrictions, when others do it, they can attract their attention.

Because of these vulgar behaviors, everyone wants to do but doesn't dare, and the anchor satisfies the public's curiosity. That's why Internet celebrities use vulgar behaviors to attract attention.

There are really a lot of anchors who pump water to catch fish, in fact, this kind of behavior is really not recommended, and it really makes no sense to do this kind of time-wasting thing for the sake of traffic.

Because vulgar behavior is more likely to attract people's attention, so that people can also get tips from it, so many people will choose to attract attention through vulgar behavior.

A: Actually, most of them are for the sake of popularity and making money. They are trying to do both. Therefore, they will do whatever it takes to achieve these two goals, and some may have no bottom line.

In fact, there are some behaviors that are more interesting in our daily life, such as our canteen life, we may also allow ourselves to have an excessive behavior to a certain extent, because we sometimes don't know the limit of our behavior, and sometimes some people don't know whether the first slide violates the law, and they don't know whether their behavior is harmful to the environment. And to a certain extent, it is impossible to know whether our behaviors can have a relatively greater harm to society. In fact, now that the live broadcast industry is developing more and more, many people want to let their behaviors be known by more people and be known by more people through live broadcasts. The live broadcast of pumping water to catch fish was reported by volunteers, even if it does not belong to natural waters, is such a move worth emulating?

I don't think it's worth emulating for three main reasons:

The first reason is that such behavior leads to a bad role model. In fact, this kind of behavior itself is a very bad behavior, and if we all follow it, it will bring more and more bad demonstration effects, because it will make more and more people want to imitate it, and think that it is correct.

The second reason is that such behavior is environmentally damaging. I think this kind of behavior will harm our ecological environment to a certain extent, and it may also bring about a reduction in biodiversity, because such behavior will cause some damage to organisms, and may also lead to the reduction of those fish species, so that we cannot have a better ecological environment.

The third reason is that such behaviour is harmful to society. I think this kind of behavior is actually very harmful to society, because if we all follow suit, more and more people will have a relatively large damage to the society, and will also have a relatively large damage to the ecological environment, which is very bad and very harmful.

All in all, I don't think such an act is worth emulating. Sell Jane.

The live broadcast of pumping water to catch fish was reported by volunteers, and the person who was reported said that it did not belong to natural waters and did not belong to the scope of control. I think that such a move is not only not worth emulating, but also is such an act a destruction of the ecological chain? You say you catch fish, you catch fish, why do you drain all the water?

These things are not worth emulating by any of us, whether the river or the pond is a natural water, and it is not the right thing for you to pump water to catch fish. In any case, such behavior is not recognized by people, that is, it is not worth emulating, and it is impossible to emulate it.

This unreasonable thing is unreasonable in the first place, why should he pump water to catch fish, this matter is undoubtedly destroying the balance of the ecological chain. And you're still streaming live online to pump water and catch fish, won't this affect others? Pumping water to catch fish is not a suitable thing, every adult will have such a understanding, you can fish can also catch a moderate amount of fish, but you can't pump water to catch fish, what is the difference between this and fishing with all your might?

If each of us adults doesn't think like this, what kind of thoughts will our younger generations have about such things?

Immature For an adult with independent thinking and independent thinking, we all have the three views formed in our brains, as well as the correct understanding of various things. Wouldn't an adult know to protect the environment? Didn't your education tell you to maintain the balance of the whole natural ecological environment?

If this is really the case, then I am afraid that your thinking and your understanding are also wrong. Your thoughts are immature, so your actions are also immature.

Even children know how to protect the environment, treat small animals well, and not have the mind to fish with all their might. As an adult, don't you even understand these truths?

It's not worth emulating, and such a move will have a lot of bad social impacts.

Such a move is not worth emulating, it is a bit of a destruction of the natural ecology, although it does not belong to natural waters, but such an impact is not good.