When two cars meet, there is an obstacle on one side, who lets whom?

Updated on society 2024-07-10
6 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    The party with the obstacle gives way to the opposite direction and will meet the car.

    It is a traffic term that refers to the staggered passage of trains, cars, etc. in the opposite direction at a certain place at the same time. Prepare in advance to avoid psychological panic and operational chaos when meeting the car.

    There is an obstacle on the side of the road to meet the car

    1. In the road section with obstacles, when the car encounters a car coming from the same direction, the barrier-free party should be allowed to go first;

    2. Wait for the barrier-free party to pass.

    After that, drive around the obstacle road section to prevent travel jams;

    3. If the party with the obstacle has entered the obstacle section, and the barrier-free party has not entered the obstacle section, the party with the obstacle should be allowed to go first;

    4. If there is a traffic police or commander on the obstacle section, and the commander is evacuated, the car driver should pass according to the command gesture or signal.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Hello, Article 48 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law On roads without central isolation facilities or without central lines, motor vehicles shall comply with the following provisions when encountering vehicles coming from opposite directions:

    1) Slow down and drive on the right, and keep the necessary safety distance from other vehicles and pedestrians;

    2) In the section of the road with obstacles, the barrier-free party goes first; However, when the obstacle has entered the obstacle section and the barrier-free party has not entered, the obstacle shall go first;

    c) On narrow slopes, the uphill side goes first; However, when the downhill side has reached the middle of the slope and the uphill side has not gone uphill, the downhill side goes first;

    4) On narrow mountain roads, the side that does not rely on the mountain goes first;

    5) At night, vehicles should be 150 meters away from the opposite direction of the vehicle to switch to low beams, narrow roads, narrow bridges and non-motor vehicles should use low beams.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    In terms of traffic regulations, who should take the direction of the road is usually the first, but in terms of convenience, the two cars meet each other and give each other a step and everyone is smooth.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Summary. <>

    Hello dear! I am glad to answer for you on a narrow road, two cars will meet the car, and one of the cars touches it, you can call the police to determine the responsibility. If the car has been parked and rubbed at the time of meeting, if one party is not at fault, it is the other party who bears full responsibility or main responsibility.

    If the other party feels that the space that can be passed is not enough when meeting the car, it should be communicated with the other party owner. If you park in the wrong direction and are rubbed when you meet the car, it is the responsibility of the owner of the car in the wrong direction.

    On a narrow road, two cars will meet one of the cars.

    Hello dear! I am glad to answer for you on a narrow road, two cars will meet the car, and one of the cars touches it, you can call the police to determine the responsibility. If the car has been parked and rubbed at the time of meeting, in the case that one party is not at fault, it is the other party who bears all the responsibility or the main responsibility.

    If the other party feels that the space that can be passed is not enough when the car is met, it should be communicated with the other car owner. If you park in the wrong direction and are rubbed when you meet the car, it is the responsibility of the owner of the car in the wrong direction.

    Here's the thing, the two of us will drive on a lane, I gave way to give way, she didn't know if she let it at the time, but she drove very fast, when I heard the rearview mirror ring, the sound was not loud, the rearview mirror bounced back to the clear, I thought it was okay to go forward, and then she came to me and said that I broke her car rearview mirror, let me prepare Tong compensation, she was very powerful, I didn't want to quarrel with her, so she called the police.

    We are all in normal driving.

    Now that the cars have been driven to the traffic police force, I applied for insurance, but if she didn't report, she asked me to pay for it.

    Dear, her request is how much to compensate.

    Did she stop at the time.

    The traffic police looked like a silver rental, her rearview mirror was broken, my rearview mirror had a slight scratch, I didn't know so, she said that my car was fine, and she had to accompany her car if it was broken.

    She didn't say how much she would lose, it should be the rearview mirror.

    Kiss you, you should have stopped when the mirror popped back.

    She parked the car far away from the rub and pulled over, but I didn't stop.

    If you don't stop, it's a hit-and-run.

    The car refers to the car owner driving when there is a car on the opposite side, hence the name of the car. When the road is relatively narrow, the vehicle that has conditional avoidance should let the vehicle that has unconditional avoidance pass first. Giving way to a vehicle is a type of traffic prohibition marking, which implies that when a vehicle meets a vehicle, the vehicle facing the mark must stop and give way to the vehicle on the opposite side.

    If the car will drive in a hungry environment with unclear vision, the speed of the vehicle should be reduced early; Extremity.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Two cars collide in opposite directions, one party occupies the road, but one party has no brake marks, how to divide the responsibility.

    Dear, because one party occupies the road, violating the "Chinese People's Road Traffic Safety Law", if the other party does not obviously violate the law, the party occupying the road should bear all the responsibility or main responsibility for the accident! The traffic management department of the public security organ shall, according to the role played by the parties to the traffic accident and the severity of the fault, determine the responsibility of the parties, determine the responsibility of the traffic accident, and must confirm the legal obligations of the parties involved in the accident in accordance with the law. I hope I can help you.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Summary. If two vehicles collide and the party who is not responsible scares the pedestrian, in this case, the responsible party also bears the relevant responsibility.

    Hello, happy to answer your questions.

    What to do if the two cars collide and the party is not responsible for scaring the pedestrians.

    If two vehicles collide and the party who is not responsible scares the pedestrian, in this case, the responsible party also bears the relevant responsibility.

    The party responsible for the accident bears the responsibility of the pedestrian.

    I'm responsible for the party and the pedestrian.

    It must have taken pedestrians to the doctor for examination.

    I have insurance. You also have insurance and spend money first and then reimburse.

    Isn't it supposed to be managed by the insurance company?

    The insurance company also has to treat the disease first and save people first. Advance payment.

    She is now in the hospital herself.

    In this case, you should accompany her to pay the medical bills in advance.

    I didn't go. Then he can take the invoice to you for reimbursement after spending the money.

    If I can help you, please give me a thumbs up Thank you!

Related questions
14 answers2024-07-10

Hello, it should be judged according to the nature of the debt, if it is a credit problem caused by the joint debts of the husband and wife, even the divorce will have an impact on the other party; If it is a personal debt of one of the spouses, it will not affect the credit of the other party. >>>More

27 answers2024-07-10

To fight for custody in the event of divorce, the following conditions are required:1The materials that prove the economic ability of both husband and wife, such as salary slips, tax payment certificates, bank deposit slips, property rights certificates, etc., can provide a good living and learning environment for the children, which is very beneficial to the fight for child custody. >>>More

20 answers2024-07-10

The Marriage Law clearly stipulates that the property jointly acquired by the husband and wife after marriage belongs to the joint property of the husband and wife, and should be divided equally in case of divorce, and if one party dies suddenly, if there is no will with legal effect, the property should also be inherited in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Inheritance Law and in strict accordance with the legal order of succession。In summary, the other party does not have the right to inherit all the property, and the child has the right to inherit the property, but the share needs to be determined according to the law >>>More

13 answers2024-07-10

If one of the spouses is mentally ill, I don't think it is possible to divorce. If the other party is not sick before marriage and is mentally ill after marriage, the other party cannot file for divorce, and the court does not support it. It is not his or her fault that he or she is sick, and it is the responsibility of the other party to take care of the other party.

12 answers2024-07-10

01 The specific gravity of concrete is related to its label, and different materials, strength and actual weight are different. If the plain concrete surface is about equal to the ton, the reinforced concrete surface is about equal to the ton. Lightweight concrete with ceramsite as coarse aggregate, about or tons. >>>More