Why do donations from the rich and the poor end up being evaluated differently?

The final evaluation of donations between the poor and the rich is different, because in the minds of many people, they think that the rich and the poor are divided into two classes, the rich donate, maybe he has too much money, and the donation is only a little bit, but for the poor, they may spend a lot of time to earn money. Therefore, it is not easy for the poor to donate.

If the poor and the rich donate, in fact, they both have the same meaning, they are all the same, they are both for the country, for the society to contribute, to do good deeds, to do welfare.

This may also be some role in the psychology, the psychological thinking is that the poor themselves have no money, can donate money to help others, this spirit is very valuable, the rich themselves are very rich, take out money to help the poor, that is what he should do, most of them think so, so the mentality is different, the idea is not the same.

This is the common state of mind in each of us, always feeling poor: he donates just for the belief in his heart, because he gives this money, it may affect his next meal, it will affect his life.

But in fact, it is our prejudice against the rich and pity for the weak that leads us to such ideas.

The reason why the poor and the rich have different evaluations of donations is because the rich occupy too much social resources and should give more back to the society. The poor live under pressure, and still donating, showing more kindness.

This may also be some role in the psychology, the psychological thinking is that the poor themselves have no money, can donate money to help others, this spirit is very valuable, the rich themselves are very rich, take out money to help the poor, that is what he should do, most of them think so, so the mentality is different, the idea is not the same.

This cannot be measured by rich or poor, but by the percentage of your wealth in the donation, a person can take out all the money he has, although it is small, but it is all he has.

Wealthy: Whether it's money or conveying some kind of positive spirit, he doesn't donate on the premise that his life hasn't been affected in any way.

Compared to the two, a person who has donated at the risk of his life is more worthy of respect. Isn't it?

The final evaluation of donations between the rich and the poor is different, because many people feel that the donations of the rich are just a drop in the bucket, and the donations of the poor really have to exhaust all their efforts, so there will be a distinction.

This is prejudice, and whoever donates should be recognized as long as it is helpful to those in need.

People treat the poor and the rich differently, and their donations are naturally easy for people to compare with their income, the same amount of money for the rim. But for the rich, it may be a drop in the bucket, and for the poor, it may be all his belongings. So people naturally do.

The attitude is not the same. The standards are not the same.

In fact, I think that regardless of the money donated by the rich and the poor, the nature is the same, they are all caring, but the rich are better economically, they donate more, and the poor can only measure their strength, so the comments on the donations of the rich are good and bad, but there are also different comments on the donations of ordinary people, but I think those are secondary, the most important thing is to have love and great love, and it is best to help others do their best.

Maybe in people's subconscious, they feel that the rich should donate more. The poor give a little less, according to their ability. Therefore, the same donation must be evaluated differently.

Donations from the poor are heartfelt compassion. The rich are pushed by social morality and pretend with great reluctance.

The rich donate more. It is also to give the company a better reputation. Or the individual has a good reputation. Poor donations, those are well-intentioned. Although the donation is small, the accumulation of little by little will become the sea. When one side is in trouble, all sides support. All the same kindness.

Hello! I think that the rich and the poor should donate the same, both give their own love, but it is just a matter of donating more and donating less, the rich have more money to transfer, and the poor earn less if they don't have much money, so the final evaluation is different.

The amount of money donated by the rich is large and the amount of money donated by the poor is small, and the donation of money by the rich will be a sensational news, and the donation of money by the poor is just a loving participation, which is the largest area.

Donations from the rich and the poor end up being judged differently. It's because of the rich people's view of money. Money that we thought we would never make in a lifetime could be earned for them in a day. However, some of them were still very stingy when they were in military control, and this is the reason why we are indignant.

There are too many people who hate the rich, society is like this, I can't see others well, I remember reading a report, the content is like this, the reporter interviewed many people, there are two options, a your monthly salary is 10,000 and your friend's monthly salary is 15,000, b you and your friend's salary are 3,000, many people choose b, because everyone doesn't want to see others live much better than themselves, the rich and the poor donate the same reason, you poor donate 100,000, half of his property, He hoped and wanted to kidnap the rich man and make him donate half of the rich man's property. Why don't the poor think about it, the rich have suffered more than you poor people to accumulate so much wealth.

Because everyone's thinking is different, some people will be jealous of the rich, resulting in deviations in thinking. So give a different evaluation.

It is normal that the final evaluation of donations between the poor and the rich is different, because the rich donate more, and we pay more attention to it, and the poor tend to donate less, and the attention is not as great as that of the rich.

The amount of money donated depends not on the amount of money, but on the person's economic situation, a poor person has difficulty in supporting himself, and he has to squeeze out a part of it to donate to others, how noble is this spirit. And for the rich, they have a large economy, and it is nothing to take out some money. On the other hand, if he donates less, he will be looked down upon.

Why do the rich give their money rather than lend money to the poor? Cao Dewang told the truth.

1.Because he himself has suffered a lot, he also wants to make an umbrella for others when he sees them in the rain. I hope there will be fewer people in the world who suffer like themselves.

2.The poor are more able to accept a lot of suffering, so he knows how much he wants strangers to lend a helping hand when a person really needs help, and he understands the feeling of needing salvation. When a person is most helpless, if you help them, they may have more or less influence on themselves, etc., then at this time it is very important for themselves and for others, with poetry and a bit of kindness, then the world will be more warm, more love.

3.He is kind with a lot of luck, whether he is poor or not, or he is not so rich materially, but his kind heart will not decrease with his lack of economy, it is because he is not very good financially, so he has experienced more suffering and knows what it is like to suffer, so he also wants to help others. I hope that there will be people who can help me in the future.

4.And everyone will have a sadness, even though they are poor and not rich materially, but the heart of wanting to help others is constant. Although the money may not be donated is very much, and there may be some ideas of a drop in the bucket, but if there is a share, maybe others lack this little money, and sometimes some children in the mountains are very poor, and there is nothing so much, which is very important for them.

Kindness does not distinguish between rich and poor!

If she has the ability, she wants to help people who are worse off than her.

Because he understands what it is like to be poor. He knows it well.

Don't you think it's a very awkward question? Isn't it mandatory for the rich to donate, but for the poor not to donate? What is a donation, voluntary is called donation, no one has to donate.

However, as a group of people who got rich first in the society, they should give back to the society to a certain extent; If people feel that a rich person does not give enough to society, some people will come out to condemn them, and some people will come out to scold them. Is this a moral kidnapping? There must be people who hate the rich in this part of the trolls who jump out to condemn and scold.

But I think as a rich person should do something for society. It doesn't have to be a donation or something, it's still very simple for some people to come out and do a charity event. I know you must have a problem with these trolls, and I think they are not happy with scolding, but if they scold people to make people in the disaster area have an extra bowl of rice and a tent, I think it is worth it.

I'm not rich, but I will participate in donation events, more or less because of my heart. When a wealthy man with a lot of money is indifferent in the face of natural and man-made disasters, I think it's normal to be scolded, isn't it?

In my opinion, when someone in a society needs help, everyone will take the initiative to support according to their own strength, so that it is a harmonious society, whether it is because he is afraid of condemnation or his conscience finds out, as long as he can really do practical things, this is good. In a simple sentence, one donation of one yuan from 1.4 billion people in China is 1.4 billion. With so much money, it can solve a lot of problems, but it's just a dream.

You are so rich, you donate so much, can you have a good conscience?" However, if we reply "no explanation" to this, it is unreasonable for public welfare practitioners.

Simply replying with an argument like moral kidnapping will make everyone emotionally uncomfortable. "Industry insiders believe that this emotional incident is mainly due to everyone's ignorance of the proportion of international pre-lease donations. It seems that foreign charity is mainly for the rich to "give", but in fact, in the proportion of donations in the United States, the proportion of donations from entrepreneurs is much lower than that of public donations.

A mature public welfare and charity environment means that everyone is invested, a bit like buying a public welfare lottery ticket, with multiple people participating, and individual investment is limited but trickle. Experts call for the advent of the era of public welfare for all – that is, to pay more attention to the breadth of participation.

Entrepreneurs develop enterprises with heart, pay taxes in accordance with the law, and strictly abide by laws and regulations, which is the role of entrepreneurs in social responsibility. Perhaps, although he doesn't donate much, he uses more money to operate, and then pays more taxes and solves more jobs, so is this a greater public welfare? "The industry believes that in order to promote participation in public welfare, it is okay to publicize through donations, but too much emphasis is suspected of narrowing public welfare and charity.