Puzzle question Why is it less than one dollar .

1.The owner's discounted price (25) + the money the waiter hid (2) = the total cost of the traveler (27).

2.Passenger's original cost (30) = discounted fare (25) + owner's return money (5) 3Passenger's original cost (30) = Passenger's current total cost (27) + Passenger's last refund (3).

4.The refund money received by the traveler (3) + the money hidden by the waiter (2) = the return money of the store owner (5) 5That is to say, in the end, the amount of money spent by the three passengers includes the part that was hidden by the waiter, so if you ask for the total amount, it is not the money hidden by the waiter, but the refund of the 3 yuan that the passenger received at the end.

So, it's just a trap of logical deviation, and the money didn't fly away from beginning to end!

The problem is like this: the 3 of them paid 9 yuan, 3x9 = 27, which is their expenditure, which includes two parts (room price 25) (two yuan for waiter), 25 + 2 = 27, and 27 contains these two yuan. Instead of 27, plus two yuan, the remaining 3 yuan, one yuan for each of the three of them!

Think of it that way.

The boss actually received 25 yuan + 2 yuan taken by the waiter = 27 yuan.

The 27 yuan is what they lost.

Now they have 1 dollar each.

It's 3 pieces in total, no more, no less.

The $27 in the question has been added to the $2 that the waiter received.

Therefore, the question of "that is, only 9 yuan per person" is wrong and confusing.

27 yuan includes 2 yuan hidden by the waiter, 25 2 27 yuan, a total of 27 yuan, 30 yuan is a disrupting data, useless.

The typical topic secretly changed the concept, and in the end: the three people jointly took out 27 yuan, the boss got 25 yuan, and the waiter took 2 yuan. 27=25+2

If you have to count 30 as a number.

Then 10x3 (all paid) = 30 = 25 (boss earns) + 1x3 (customer earns) + 2 (waiter earns).

My sunrise * boss waiter fast what a quick money ?

The previous is not wrong, it is equivalent to A, B and C out of 9 yuan, then 3 * 9 = 27

gave 27 yuan to Ding, and Ding spent 25 yuan and lost 2 yuan, so it was 27 = 25 + 2

So, it should be 27-2 = 25, not 27 + 2, and it doesn't make sense to use 27 + 2 at all.

First of all, let's be clear: the normal equation should be expenditure = income (e.g., 27 (guest expenses) = 2 (guy income) + 25 (boss income).

Expenditure and income can only be subtracted when they are on the side of the equal sign, e.g. expenditure-income = 0;

There is a problem with the equation of 27 + 2 = 29, 27 is the expenditure of three guests, and 2 is the income of the guy (note: the 27 yuan spent by the guest includes 2 yuan of the guy's income).

In the equation, 27 and 2 can only be subtracted, and there is no reason to add them, or they are placed on both sides of the equation.

Now please tell me 27 + 2 = 29, what is this 29.

So, if you want to list the equation with the number 30, it should be:

30 (the customer's initial money) - 3 (the customer's **'s money) - 2 (the guy's income) - 25 (the boss's income) = 0

Hello landlord. This issue has been raised in several issues.

Besides, it is an application question.

I am. This is the topic of filial piety.

If you're counting that one dollar to **.

It's actually reverse thinking.

Originally. The boss Tong took 25 yuan.

Give them $3 back.

The waiter was right to swallow 2 yuan privately.

Look at it this way.

One of them paid 9 yuan, a total of 27

The waiter still has 2 yuan there.

Note! Here's the problem.

You've miscalculated! The waiter is 2 yuan.

You shouldn't be there.

to calculate. Because the general ledger is originally only.

Where did it come from? What about $30?

If you don't understand.

I'll do the math again. They spent altogether.

$27. Because the 3 yuan has been returned?

So. You count the time.

It shouldn't. 30 yuan.

But. $27.

Such. It won't appear.

You're confused. Where the dollar went.

Hope it helps!

They each ended up spending 10-1=9 yuan, that is, a total of 9 3 = 27 yuan.

The 27 yuan includes the 25 yuan that the boss gets + the 2 yuan that the waiter hides = 27 yuan.

In addition, the three of them each got back 1 yuan 3 = 3 yuan, which is exactly 30 yuan.

The $2 the waiter took was included in the $27, the money they paid, not the money they got back! So that 1 dollar doesn't exist at all.

It's not such an algorithm, here, the concept is confused, so it costs a total of 25 yuan to live, and three people have a total of 9 yuan *3

27 yuan, and the other two yuan were greedy by the younger brother.

That's right.

(30-5）÷3=

There is a small misleading question in the title, "The waiter returned 5 yuan, the waiter was greedy for 2 yuan, and one person gave 1 yuan, which means that one person is 9 fast." "Actually, no, 30-5) 3=

It should be out of everyone's place.

In addition to the waiter greedy two pieces.

28+2=30 is exactly thirty!

That piece was missed!

The premise is that the three of them have already paid 10 yuan, and the next 9 yuan is misleading, the total number of 30 yuan in the hotel, the boss saves 5 yuan is equivalent to 25, and the 2 yuan stolen by the waiter is regarded as the boss did not save money, that is, the hotel spent a total of 27, saying that the last person has 1 yuan left.

This topic is just to mislead you when you explain it later, so that you can believe his analysis, only look at useful information, don't look at the rest, and analyze it yourself, just fine.

One person out of 9 yuan, a total of 3 people out of a total of 27 yuan, minus the waiter's 2 yuan, there are still 25 yuan (at the boss's).

Why do you need to add 2 pieces, don't be induced by the title!

It should be 27 yuan, including those two yuan.

Other words. Accommodation cost 25 yuan.

The remaining two dollars became the money taken by the service yuan.

Then add a piece that one person recovered.

25+2+3 30 yuan.

The 19 paid by each person already includes the boss's 2 yuan, so it should be (20-1) * 3 = 57, plus 3 yuan returned = 60

9 pieces per person for 3 people.

Equals 27 blocks.

One of the one who should be returned to them should be added.

Instead of the waiter greedy for 2 pieces...

There is a small misunderstanding in the title, "The waiter returned 5 yuan, the waiter was greedy for 2 yuan, and one person gave 1 yuan, which means that one person is 9 fast." "Actually, no, 30-5) 3=

It should be out of everyone's place.

In addition to the waiter greedy two pieces.

28+2=30 is just thirty and is smiling!

That piece of lifting was missed!