The illustration of primary school textbooks has caused controversy, what level does the designer s

I think the level of this illustration is really very low-level, I didn't expect his art general consultant to be a book design attitude, I have to say that this title is really very watery. Because everyone knows that these books are for children, should we convey a positive idea to children, let them know right and wrong, and let them know the beauty of the world.

However, this primary school textbook taught by me not only did not make children feel the beauty of the world, but made them feel the ugliness of the world. The eyes of the illustrated characters in the textbook are very strange, the eyes are particularly dull, and many of them are squinting and crooked, and there is no beauty at all. The forehead is bare, the corners of the mouth are also very strange, and the eyes are dull, is this what children should look like?

Definitely not. If the designer's child were like this, I don't think he would have accepted it, and he might have felt very broken.

I feel that this is completely scandalizing us Chinese, although it is impossible for everyone in the world to be beautiful, some people are particularly good-looking, and some people are relatively ugly. But don't all of them look like this, do they? His face is clearly a Down's patient, and we really want to know how such a picture can pass the review and be circulated in the market for so many years.

There are so many children who have been poisoned by this book, it is really scary to think about.

Some people think that this is a deliberate parent, but we will find that it is really not because he is not only very ugly, his eyes are very dull, but also some of the behaviors in it are really very **view, even if it is an adult, I think it is inappropriate, let alone a child**. I hope that there will be a good improvement this time, and I also hope that the children's teaching materials and books can be seriously organized.

The level is very poor, very vulgar. The designer drew the children very ugly, and he also drew things that should not be drawn, and he was speechless.

In everyone's impression, each illustration in the textbook has been carefully selected by professionals, with the content of the article, as long as you see the illustrations, you can remember the articles in the textbook that year, so that many post-80s and post-90s are still fresh in their memory. With the change of the times, the textbooks will be updated and iterated, but I don't know since when, when parents look at the textbooks of contemporary students, they are a little speechless: the characters in the pictures do not seem to be healthy.

The illustrations of the "People's Education Edition of Mathematics Textbook" are on fire, and the facial expressions are stiff and weird, and the People's Education Edition textbook is a textbook published by the People's Education Publishing House, covering the content of primary school to high school, and it is a textbook used in the compulsory education stage, and its influence is very wide. The illustrations of the "People's Education Edition of Mathematics Textbooks" suddenly became popular, and many netizens commented that the facial expressions of the illustrations were stiff and weird, for fear of affecting children's learning.

And it is mainly a primary school textbook, which happens to be the period when children's imagination is the richest, and the concerns of netizens are not unreasonable. Even many netizens said that they didn't see any aesthetics, but gave people a weird feeling. Children's textbooks are mainly based on animation, and at the same time have bright colors, so that the children's attention can be concentrated, and the painting style should also be mainly sunny and positive, rather than blurred eyes and strange mouths.

Textbooks are the "partners" of students, accompanying children throughout childhood, and the quality of textbooks may even affect children's lives, and textbooks are an important way for children to acquire knowledge.

Especially children in the lower grades are very susceptible to the influence of **, parents and the Ministry of Education should pay attention to this issue, and it is even very likely to affect the children's aesthetics.

Education has begun to pay attention to the development of morality, intelligence, physical and aesthetics, children's aesthetics can not deviate, and teaching materials should be paid more attention to as children's enlightenment.

Although it is said that everyone's aesthetic vision is different, since it is to draw illustrations for teaching materials, it should focus on the aesthetics of the public and should not affect the aesthetics of children.

There is nothing wrong with art itself, but the status of the textbooks is different, the textbooks of the lower grades are the "enlightenment tutors" of the children, let me ask, are parents willing to let their children's aesthetics become what they look like?

All in all, the importance of teaching materials cannot be overlooked, and children's childhood should be full of vitality, not lifelessness, and even the expression is the same.

Problems have arisen, and they should be paid attention to, and relevant educators should pay more attention to them when adapting.

The illustrations of the human education version were discovered by parents by chance.,But it's been used for more than ten years.,I really don't know how it will be approved.,So many teachers use it.,There's no one**.,Wait until now**.,I especially can't accept the American elements and the bunny girl elements.,There's no spirit in the characters.。

The illustrations in primary school texts are more important than words, and the information expressed is richer and more concrete, so the teaching materials that get along with children day and night must not be played at will. At least there must be no aesthetic problems, "the eyes of the masses are bright", everyone thinks it is ugly, and if it is not good-looking, there must be a real problem. Children's education is no trivial matter, which is also a sense of responsibility, and I hope that these uncomfortable illustrations can be eliminated as soon as possible and updated in time.

I don't think that's the case, relatively speaking, some characters with more problems, too rigid not only have certain problems in aesthetics, but also have a certain impact on the growth and development of students, which is not conducive to their input of correct value construction.

It's not like this, it's not that it points out that there are aesthetic problems, but there are problems in other aspects, which is why it causes controversy among everyone.

I don't think it's that our aesthetics have declined, and if we had declined, we wouldn't have caused such a controversy, but maybe it was that we didn't go through a rigorous review at that time, which led to such a bad social impact.

The illustrations of primary school mathematics textbooks in the people's education version have aroused heated discussions, not that our aesthetics have declined, but that the publishing house has failed to review them, and they are becoming more and more perfunctory. <>

For the illustrations in the textbook, I personally feel that it is absolutely impossible to mention it in one stroke, and it is very necessary for the relevant personnel to be held accountable, the People's Publishing House needs to take responsibility, and Wu Yong's studio cannot escape. Because of their mistakes, many children have been conveyed a lot of negative influences, and this situation must not be tolerated. Children's aesthetics are not a trivial matter, which is an important part of the formation of values.

Some people think that this is a big fuss, and I think it's because you don't have a personal experience, let alone a distraction. Whether it's a character similar to Tang'er, or some of the best illustrations ......These are very serious mistakes. Textbooks are important reading materials for children's enlightenment, and no loss is allowed.

And it's the kids who are able to realize that something is wrong when they see the illustrations, which means that the negative impact has reached a very serious level. <>

The illustration of the textbook is definitely not a problem of our aesthetics, but a problem of publishers and designers. You know, before this edition of the textbook came out, all the textbooks used by our children were very healthy and lively. Each illustration is carefully thought out by the designer.

What impressed me most was the picture of the melon field in the leap soil. The composition and the use of color are very appropriate and perfect, and the artistic sensitivity of the children of that generation will definitely be much higher than that of the children who use the teaching materials of the human education version now. <>

After all this nonsense, what I want to say most is that the aesthetics of the Renjiao version of the textbook must be improved. Beauty is placed in different places, and the standards are also different. There is beautiful beauty and ugly beauty, but what children in the development stage need is the beauty of truth, goodness and beauty.

Personally, I feel that the later revision can be designed by Mr. Jing Shaozong, and the illustrations of his textbooks are super beautiful. The whole style of painting not only integrates ethnic elements, but also has a very good color aid, and the characters in it are also lively and healthy.

I don't think our aesthetics have declined, it's just because some textbooks want to be updated to add more fun to children in the process of reading, so the illustrations on the textbooks have been changed, but to change the illustrations, we should also think comprehensively, let these illustrations guide the children's aesthetics, and these illustrations are also very strong in guiding children's outlook on life and values, so we must be cautious when choosing illustrations.

It's not that our aesthetics have declined, it's because this interjection in the people's education version is really too ugly and affects children's aesthetics.

I don't think it's that people's aesthetics have become lower, it's just that the censorship was not strict at the time, so this is why this situation has occurred.

Even if it is difficult to set standards for beauty and ugliness, the inner spiritual outlook represented by demeanor and temperament should always be full of vitality, and such decadent and weird expressions and tones are indeed harmful and useless. I hope to give children more positive wisdom and sow positive energy from an early age, rather than with so-called "funny" content.

I don't think it's because people's aesthetics have become lower now, but because they deliberately misinterpret the meaning of illustrations when making illustrations, and in this way, the relevant departments should crack down on this kind of behavior, and this kind of illustration will have a very serious impact on children's growth and development.