What are the details of the incident of improper illustration in primary school textbooks?

At the beginning, it was the illustrations of the mathematics textbooks of the people's education version that caused controversy among netizens, and in the end, the matter became bigger and bigger, and the people's education society and the Ministry of Education responded one after another, and the major ** reported one after another, and the Ministry of Education set up an investigation team to investigate.

The illustrations in the textbooks have caused heated discussions, and the illustrations in these textbooks have strange eyes and no aesthetics. There are significant differences between other versions of the textbook. Netizens said that the audience of the textbook is primary school students, which will subtly affect the aesthetics of children, and it needs to be treated with caution.

The illustrated characters in the primary school math textbook are particularly ugly, and the children's facial features that seem to have Down syndrome are exposed, exposing the children's private parts, and so on.

Illustration of the ugly appearance of the characters.

Previously, the topic of ugly characters in the illustrated characters in the primary school mathematics textbooks published by the People's Education Publishing House and causing discomfort rushed to the hot search many times, causing widespread attention. It is worth mentioning that the textbook has been used for more than 10 years since it was approved. In the face of a large number of netizens' doubts, the People's Education Agency said that in response to suggestions from all walks of life, it has re-started to draw the cover and some illustrations of the mathematics textbook, and will also comprehensively evaluate all the textbooks to improve the quality of the design.

Personally, I was surprised to hear that these illustrations had been in use for more than a decade. We need to know that primary school is only a few years, and more than ten years is a very exaggerated number. It has to be ** out, otherwise such ** illustrations will continue to be used.

It will definitely affect the healthy development of the child.

When did ugly illustrations infiltrate elementary school textbooks?

So the question is, why can such ugly** illustrations infiltrate elementary school textbooks? I don't understand one point, is the Education Bureau's review so lax? I can probably guess what kind of reason this is happening.

Wu Yong's studio has been serving as the illustrator of the textbook for a long time, and many of the illustrations are from his studio, and the previous illustration style is very normal, without any **. As he and the publisher grew trust, the publisher relaxed its censorship of their studio. So in this way, the illustrations of ** flowed to the textbooks of elementary school students.

And it's been more than ten years, if no one comes out, I believe that these ** illustrations will continue to harm many children.

Summary.

Overall, this is a relatively scary thing to think about. The Education Bureau has already begun to investigate the matter, and we can only wait for official information on what the specific outcome will be. But in this matter, if you want to be held responsible, in addition to Wu Yong's studio to take responsibility, the relevant audit department of the Education Bureau should also bear some responsibility, after all, a slap in the face can't be heard.

According to the investigation results of the Education Bureau, these ugly illustrations have gradually fallen into primary school textbooks more than 10 years ago, and it is hoped that the relevant departments can conduct a strict investigation of the People's Education Society.

Those ugly illustrations have appeared in primary school textbooks for a long time, with the development of society, people pay more attention to the physical and mental development of children, so people have paid attention to this event, the illustrations must be in line with the child's physical and mental development age, and at the same time consider whether it is helpful for the child's development.

Those ugly illustrations were designed by Wu Yong and Lu Min, and have been around for more than ten years.

Because the illustrations in these primary school textbooks have not gone through a rigorous review process, we can see these inappropriate works appear on the textbooks of primary school textbooks.

When the issue of illustrations in elementary school textbooks caused controversy, many people paid great attention to these textbook illustrations on the Internet. If you look at these illustrations from an adult's perspective, these illustrations not only have serious aesthetic problems, but also have certain value-oriented problems, which is the main reason why everyone is very worried and angry about this, because these illustrations are not conducive to the healthy growth of children at all.

The Bureau of Textbooks has officially investigated the issue of illustrations in the relevant textbooks.

Due to serious misconduct in the illustrations of many textbooks and children's picture books, the Textbook Bureau has stated that it will formally investigate the illustrations of the relevant textbooks and further strengthen the review of the relevant textbooks. Some people say that these illustrations are not only ugly, but many people also say that these materials will seriously affect children's aesthetic orientation. <>

These illustrations do not go through a rigorous review process.

Because many of the illustrations themselves are used as children's textbooks, when the relevant textbooks are officially published and released, the textbooks will definitely go through the relevant review, which means that the relevant textbooks will go through a strict review process. In most cases, the publication of a textbook requires at least three revisions, and if these textbooks have gone through all the formal processes, I believe that no adult will be willing to let such an illustration pass the review. <>

There may be negligence on the part of the relevant auditors.

After there are problems with the illustrations of these textbooks, everyone not only pays attention to the design quality of these textbooks themselves, but also pays more attention to the work of the reviewers of these textbooks. Just imagine, if the relevant auditors do not play a certain audit and supervision significance, the auditors themselves have serious dereliction of duty. If this is indeed the case, I hope that the Textbook Bureau can give you a satisfactory answer.

Recently, the incident related to the illustration of primary school textbooks has attracted widespread attention in the society. Why is that?

On the one hand, the illustration of primary school textbooks reflects the inadequacy of education in China. Most of the illustrations in China's primary school textbooks are created by foreigners, and these illustrations often do not reflect the actual situation of primary school students in China. As a result, primary school students in our country often feel unfamiliar and unfamiliar with the use of these teaching materials.

In addition, the illustrations in primary school textbooks in China often lack richness and diversity, and the cognitive ability and imagination of primary school students are not well exercised.

On the other hand, the illustration of elementary school textbooks reflects the problems of the education system in our country. At present, China has not yet established a perfect system of nationalized teaching materials, and most of the teaching materials are still created by foreigners. As a result, primary school students in our country often feel unfamiliar and unfamiliar with the use of these teaching materials.

In addition, China has not yet established a complete national education system, and most of the teachers are foreigners. As a result, primary school students in our country often feel unfamiliar and unfamiliar with the use of these teaching materials.

In short, there are three reasons why the illustration incident of primary school textbooks has attracted widespread attention from the society: first, it reflects the inadequacy of education in China; Second, it reflects the historical stage that China is currently in; Third, it reflects the many problems that China is currently facing.

If you have any questions about the self-test test, do not know the content of the self-test test center, and do not know the local self-test test policy, click on the bottom to consult the official website teacher and receive free review materials:

He said that this is a feeling, but many people can't accept this style of painting, and it feels very weird.

Wu Yong said in a previous interview that his concept of book design has changed from good looking to good reading, which is actually due to the difference in design vision and pattern.

The designers of these illustrated characters have previously said that book design is a feeling.

It definitely needs to be taken seriously. Because education is the foundation of the country, if the teaching materials of the children have become the appearance of the current Senqiao, then how should the flowers of the motherland be correctly guided in the future?

I think it should be taken seriously. Because children love to read these illustrations, what if they don't establish a correct outlook on life and values?

The textbooks that are running now are not only problematic with the illustrations, but also with the content, and students can't understand the textbooks just by looking at them, there is no logic, and they don't know what to do, at best it is a syllabus, forcing students to buy teaching aids, ask for tutors, and attend tutorial classes. It is recommended to use the textbooks of the 80s, the basic knowledge has not changed, the above description is detailed, and students can learn it by self-study, so as to save a lot of educational funds.

Personally, I think that it should be paid attention to, and the issue of children's education cannot be ignored.

The national textbook is the belief of the Chinese people, and the Chinese textbook represents the excellent traditional culture of the Chinese people, and is the virtue of the excellent cultural inheritance of Chinese history.

Cultural self-confidence should start from children, start from teaching orange Shicai to teach children's books, and try to use Chinese stories, characters, and literary works if you can use China! In order to establish cultural self-confidence! Strictly guard against cultural aggression by enemy agents!

What does it mean to have a picture of an old Chinese textbook for a question in a mathematics textbook? The quality of Chinese textbooks, whether they are old or new, is it very high?

The People's Education Society should be checked! However, mobile online games should also be banned, mobile online games are the opium of the new era, so that both adults and minors, are addicted to Tong Dou in it, here, I strongly appeal, Cong Lun socks ban mobile phone network infiltration games!

The state should thoroughly investigate these traitors who collude with the country and the people internally and externally.

What are the chain reactions caused by the problem of "illustration" in the primary school textbook of the People's Education Edition? Perhaps the problem isn't just caused by illustrations. I used to be a primary school math teacher for three years, and I happened to use the 1-3 grade textbook, and to be honest, I didn't find any problems.

My undergraduate major was chemistry, but after entering the school, I was assigned to elementary school mathematics, which is called mathematics, physics and chemistry.

Personally, I am a rather rough line person, and I don't have the sensitivity to this kind of ideological infiltration. In the past three years, I have not found any problems in this, and the things I consider about work every day are, how to talk about this knowledge point to students to understand, how the child's homework has not been completed, why he still can't talk several times, how to write my lesson plan to meet the requirements of the new curriculum reform, the water gun pen that has been popular in the class recently has potential safety hazards, and the student's information sheet is quickly calculated before Wang Model, and the student's parents have not returned from the medium and high-risk areas to ......I didn't care about the illustrations on the textbooks, and I used PPT and tutorials in class, and the textbooks were reduced to exercise books.

I don't know the training mechanism of primary education, but I know that I am definitely not up to standard, and I can't do everything for each child's family background, psychological condition, and personality traits. You can't prevent it from happening, you can only make up for it.

Therefore, I chose to leave this position, which is good for everyone. Otherwise, in this situation, if the student asks me, teacher, why is this illustration so ugly? How can I explain that.

The Chinese people didn't realize how outrageous Tang'er's painting style was. Moreover, this kind of art form that scandalizes Chinese people and imperceptibly worships foreigners is actually directly cultivated for children. When a group of children grew up and entered the Academy of Fine Arts, they found that the Tang works they had seen back then were actually master works, and various foreign awards were especially respected.

They will also begin to think that there is nothing strange about creating these. At that time, Tang's painting style has become one of the art schools in China, and it is impossible to correct it again.

Now there are a lot of parents who have put out the ** that they said that there was a problem with the insertion of Wang mold paintings, and they have all begun to denounce the people's education club, and now the primary school students will make trouble as soon as they go to class, affecting the exams of primary school students, and the Sujiao version will be involved in Chi's family.

First of all, parents began to crusade against this educational publishing house. Ask them for an explanation. Some parents even complained to the Education Bureau. Many people have made remarks about the beginning of the day. Society began to unrest.

For example, who published this textbook? Why doesn't the publishing house exist? Why didn't Wu Chan Duan Yong come forward to explain? How will this play out? Will Wu Yong be sentenced?