Is it reasonable for my mother in law to charge me 3,000 yuan for my grandson my son ?

Is it reasonable for your mother-in-law to charge you 3,000 yuan to help you take care of the child? Of course it is reasonable! If you feel unreasonable and want to shout grievances, it is estimated that most people will not support you.

Let me tell you this, if you and your mother-in-law live in the city, it is really reasonable to charge you 3,000 yuan a month to help you take care of the children.

Of course, if you have to question whether it is reasonable, or even think that it is unreasonable, it can only be because it is unreasonable to give less money, not because it is unreasonable to give more money.

Why? Let's settle accounts with you: if you ask a nanny to help you take care of your children through a housekeeping company, it will cost about 5,000 to 6,000 yuan a month in first-tier cities, which still refers to the salary part, and you also have to pack food, accommodation, daily necessities, and one or two holidays to go home and return expenses, etc., all the costs are calculated, it must be much higher than the number of 6,000 yuan.

Of course, the cost in second-, third- and fourth-tier cities may be slightly lower, but in any case, no matter how low it is, it should not be less than 3,000 yuan a month.

In this way, your mother-in-law will charge you 3,000 yuan, should you think it is reasonable?

Besides, you have forgotten that it is your mother-in-law who helps you take care of the child, and it is your lover's biological mother. Therefore, even if she doesn't help you take care of the child, if you have the ability, give her 1,000 yuan or 2,000 yuan a month to honor her, and you should do it!

If you calculate it like this, your mother-in-law will only charge 3,000 yuan for you to take care of the child, do you think it is more reasonable?

So, you don't have to worry about this matter anymore, and you don't have to worry about what is reasonable or unreasonable. If the mother-in-law really doesn't give you the child, and you have to hire a nanny to solve the problem of taking the child, you will know whether it is reasonable or not.

If you still think it is unreasonable, then there is only one situation that everyone may support you, that is, your mother-in-law does not live in the city, but in the countryside, the cost of living is relatively low, and giving your mother-in-law 3,000 yuan a month is indeed enough.

But even if this is the case, it is only said that it is enough, and it does not necessarily mean that there is much surplus. Because, with the grandmother, the child needs to eat, drink, wear, and toys, and the cost is also a lot. So, in fact, it is still reasonable.

This depends on what I think, I feel both reasonable and unreasonable, reasonable because the mother-in-law helped take care of the child, unreasonable is to bring her own girl's child, should not have money, so, it depends on how to look at it.

I think this is very wrong for my mother-in-law, after all, my mother-in-law should be obliged to help take care of her grandson, so she should not receive monetary rewards and make family affection so weak.

Reasonable, why should the old man help his children take care of the children, bringing it is a kind of kindness and thoughtfulness, and the nanny outside is much higher than this cost, even if the old man doesn't want this money, you have to give living expenses every month, you can't help you take the child in vain.

Reasonable, because the elderly help to take care of the children, it is not easy, appropriate economic subsidies should also be given, if you look for a nanny outside, 3000 yuan is not enough, and not at ease.

My mother-in-law charged me 3,000 yuan to bring my grandson, which I think is reasonable, because my mother-in-law also has her own daily life, but she is willing to waste her time to help you take care of the child, which is also very consistent with the corresponding fee charged by you.

Plausible. A child usually eats and drinks Lazar, and the mother-in-law is all responsible, if you invite the confinement sister-in-law, it will definitely be more than this money. If you don't think it's appropriate, you can let your parents bring it.

I think this is very reasonable, if you hire a nanny to take care of the child, then it will cost about 3,000 yuan a month, and you don't have to worry about your mother-in-law.

My mother-in-law charged me 3,000 yuan to bring my grandson (my son), I think it is very reasonable, as a parent is not obliged to help me take care of the child.

It's better not to bring grandchildren. If you have money or not, you will also have a white belt. If the son-in-law does not give living expenses, the daughter will ask for it, and if the daughter can't ask for it, the daughter will go out. It's best not to get your parents involved.

The father-in-law helped his daughter and son-in-law take care of the children, and said that the daughter and son-in-law would each take out 800 yuan for living expenses every month, and the daughter gave it, but the son-in-law did not give it, so he would return his children to him and enjoy the blessings of his own children. You know, as a grandfather, you are not obligated to bring children to them.

This question is more contradictory, the daughter and the son-in-law are husband and wife, the daughter's living expenses to the father-in-law are the joint property after marriage, and the son-in-law is the default state, and the father-in-law helps to bring the grandson, as a child, he should be filial to the elderly, if the son-in-law does not give the father-in-law money, the daughter needs to seriously consider whether the person who will be together for the rest of her life is responsible.

Isn't the daughter and son-in-law a family? Why divide each to another?

In this state, it is better to divorce as soon as possible.

What is the situation, if you are not divorced, it is an AA system in life, let your daughter find a daughter, if you are divorced, he also has the obligation to give child support to warn your daughter, don't.

How does it feel weird? Could it be that the daughter and son-in-law are already divorced? Otherwise, how can you give money and give each other? In this case, he sent the child back to him, and he obediently gave the money.

Give your son-in-law a hit.

Let him pick up the child.

Naturally, he knew he had forgotten something.

Can this still be AA system? Absolutely!

Ask your son-in-law directly, you can take a child for 1,600 yuan, where can I find such a good thing? Now the nanny will need 3,000 yuan for cleaning, the nanny for the confinement nanny will cost more than 5,000, and the father-in-law will only need 1,600, which is really a family price!

This is a matter of ethical and financial considerations. It is recommended that Danji's grandmother and the old man discuss together, and negotiate a fair and reasonable solution according to the actual economic situation. Possible scenarios are:

1.The grandmother gave her grandson-in-law 4,000 yuan, but she did not pay until the grandson-in-law made a satisfactory change of heart to ensure that the money was well spent. 2.

The grandmother gave the grandson-in-law 2,000 yuan, and the grandfather gave the grandson-in-law 2,000 yuan, which could not only share the risk, but also express the family's appreciation for the grandson-in-law. 3.The grandmother and the old man gave the grandson-in-law 2,000 or 4,000 yuan together, but used this money as the wedding money or the decoration of the wedding room after the grandson-in-law made a change of words, so as to enhance the practical significance of the money.

If you want your grandson-in-law to know that it is your grandfather's intentions, you can give 2,000 to your grandmother and 2,000 to your grandfather, so that it will be clearer and clearer, as long as you can show your hunger and happiness and only reach out of their hearts.

The effect is the same, 4,000 yuan for the grandson-in-law and 4,000 yuan for the grandfather. If you look at the wedding scene, Sun pretends to be a grandfather and grandma to give red envelopes to his grandson-in-law respectively, which makes it look lively and atmospheric, because outsiders don't know how many red envelopes to change their mouths. But you can see two big red envelopes.

And it's not impossible for grandpa and grandma to give a red envelope together, and it looks aura if they don't give it separately.

Fair sharing: If both the grandmother and the grandfather agree to pay for the grandson-in-law's mouth change, you can consider letting them pay 2,000 yuan each, which seems to be fairer and will not make one party feel suppressed or unjust.

Hands-on teaching: If the grandmother has a certain degree of eloquence and teaching experience, and is willing to spend more time and energy with her granddaughter Lu Ji Wang's son-in-law to learn and practice together, you can consider not paying the cost of oral reform, but carrying out some eloquence training and skill guidance, which can achieve similar results, and can also enhance mutual feelings and communication.

Avoid disputes: If there is a conflict or financial pressure between the grandmother and the old man, you can consider not paying the oral reform fee, and let the grandson-in-law decide whether he needs to make the oral reform, or find other ways to improve his eloquence and expression skills, so as to avoid disputes and contradictions caused by the cost of oral reform.

Since it is for four thousand, it is better for the two old men to give it separately.

Personally, I think it's reasonable, because when taking care of your son, it costs a lot of money and a lot of time to pay for it, which is quite reasonable.

I think it's reasonable, because after all, it's more than 3,000 yuan for you to hire a nanny outside, after all, your own family brings it, so it's better to rest assured.

Reasonable, because they can't bring you a child for no reason.