The woman who stole melons was chased by melon farmers and accidentally drowned, and her family clai

The plaintiff failed to provide evidence to prove that the defendant was at fault for the death of the deceased, nor could it prove that the drowning of the deceased was caused by violent pursuit, so the defendant should not be liable for compensation, and the court finally made a judgment rejecting the plaintiff's claim.

The court ruled that the woman's family claim was null and void because she was responsible for the injuries she had caused while fleeing.

The final judgment of the law is the sole responsibility of this woman. Because he is a thief. And he also has to compensate the responsibility of other melon farmers.

In this incident, the melon farmer did not need to bear the corresponding responsibility, and the easy forgetfulness in the process of escaping was also caused by his own negligence. It has nothing to do with farmers.

The demands of the deceased's family are reasonable, and the theft of melons and drowning are two different legal relationships, one involving a criminal offense and the other involving civil compensation.

Irrationality. The deceased went to steal melons that others had worked hard to grow, ignoring the law, and was discovered by the owner of the melons, and when he was being hunted down, he unfortunately drowned, which was his own act.

Greedy for urine means to suffer a big loss, but it is not destined to die, this is the road to self-defeat. Even if the thief is caught, there will be no major accidents.

The unreasonable claims of the family members are still contributing to the breeding of negative energy in society. It is true that human life is at stake, but some people are willing to be lighter than a feather, and it is indeed impossible to weigh how much loss there is.

If it is unreasonable, if it is reasonable, if 10 thieves take turns to steal melons, the melon farmers will be in vain for a year. Ten thieves have an accident, so can you accompany so much, the theft is lazy, unearned, if the thief steals anything and is caught in an accident, he will accompany the money, and the owner who can't catch it and lose something is in vain. Isn't there more and more thieves in this society?

The request of the deceased's family was unreasonable, because the deceased's family could not provide evidence to prove that the defendant was at fault for the death of the deceased, and could not prove that the deceased's drowning was caused by violent pursuit.

Pay attention to the title "Caught stealing melons and drowning"? How did you drown? Melon farmer drowned in order to punish for stealing melons? If so, the melon farmer will definitely be responsible.

There must be a relationship, it's just a matter of severity, and it is also judged according to the actual situation, whether it is forcing the melon thief to enter the water.

If it is reasonable, there must be someone who is encouraging unhealthy tendencies.

Humanitarian reparations, no other responsibility.

The deceased stole melons and died, which is sad and lamentable!

If you don't come and steal melons, can you die? You can't blame others for your own death.

Stealing someone's stuff is dead! It's unreasonable to ask others to lose money!

If there is drowning after being caught, you will definitely bear part of the responsibility.

If you don't grow melons, can she come and steal them?

There is a saying that stealing chickens does not become a loss of rice, when a woman in Zhejiang stole melons, she was chased by the owner, unfortunately fell into the water and died, no one wants such a thing to happen, after all, it is a living human life, and finally the family claimed 130,000 yuan from the owner, but in the end the court pronounced a judgment that the owner's chasing behavior did not constitute infringement, so there is no need to be liable.

This woman is an ordinary worker, and her husband is very thrifty, I heard that there is a melon field in a certain place ripe and no one is there, so she has a greedy heart, she went to this place, if you haven't stolen a few pumpkins, you were found by the owner, when the father and son found that someone stole melons, they also quickly chased over.

Seeing that someone found herself, the woman was also very panicked, kept running forward, and the other father and son chased for a while, and when they arrived at a spraying factory, they could no longer see the woman's figure, and they originally wanted to enter the factory to look for it, but they were rejected by Finch, so the father and son called the police, but they didn't even find the woman to the end**.

I thought that this was the end of the matter, but in the end I found out that when the woman escaped, she accidentally fell into the factory pond, but the woman did not know how to swim, did not believe in drowning, and after the private family knew the truth of the matter, they sued the father and son, and the court demanded compensation from the other party, because they believed that it was because of the pursuit of the father and son that the woman would run away all the way and finally drown.

However, the father and son can only bear tort liability, but the two chased after them when they found that someone was stealing melons, which was a normal reaction, so there was no fault, and they did not commit any violent acts in the process, and in the end they did not find the woman, so the behavior of these two people did not constitute infringement, subjectively speaking, they were not at fault for the luck. Even if it was the second appeal by the family of the deceased, the court rejected and upheld the original verdict, after all, it must be a judgment in pursuit of justice in front of the law, and no one expected this kind of result, which is really not worth it.

The court rejected the family's request.

The Zhejiang woman was chased into the water and died when she was stealing melons, and the family claimed 130,000 yuan, but the court rejected it, and the family requested that the woman's death in the water had nothing to do with the melon farmer and the factory where the pond was located. There is no justification for the family's claim, because in the whole case, the woman's theft of melons is an act of stealing, although the pumpkin is not a huge amount of money, but it is also the personal property of the melon farmer, and his actions have violated the property rights of the melon farmer, which is a tort.

Seeing that he was sad, the melon farmer chased after him after being stolen, and it was understandable to ask the woman to stop her infringement, and even to ask the woman for compensation was a legitimate and reasonable request. But after the woman found out that her very sad behavior was discovered by the light, she blindly ran away and in the process of being chased by the other party, she threw herself into a factory and hid in a small corner of an uninhabited island, and neither the melon farmer nor his son found out that he was hiding in **, and wanted to find this melon thief through the workers of the factory.

The melon farmer and his son returned home after not finding the woman who was stealing the melon, but the woman who was hiding accidentally fell into the pond in the factory and drowned. Two days later, the woman's body was recovered in the factory's pond, and her family believed that the woman fell into the water and drowned in the melon farmer's pursuit, so they sued the court for 130,000 yuan.

During the trial, the court held that the melon farmer found that his pumpkin was being chased by stealing, and stealing the sad person was a legitimate act of rights protection. And the woman, in order to avoid the pursuit, fled to the corner herself, and fell into the water in the corner, and the glory of chasing him was not discovered at all, and the workers in the factory knew nothing, so they could not provide the necessary help to the man who fell into the water. After much reasoning, the court held that neither the factory nor the melon farmer was responsible for the woman's death.

The death of the custodian woman was because he was found stealing, and in the process of escaping, he panicked and fell into the water, and the melon farmers who chased him and the factory workers did not know that he fell into the water, so he was responsible for his death in the water, and the family claimed compensation from the melon farmers, and there was no basis for rejecting the request.

The court's final judgment was that there was no subjective fault on the part of the Shen family and his son, there was no tortious act, and there was no causal relationship between the no-fault act and the damage result, so the chasing behavior of the Shen family and his son did not constitute infringement and did not need to bear the liability for compensation.

Because their behavior was unreasonable, many of the melons he stole did not cause harm to other people's property, and his falling into the water was also his own behavior and did not have any certain connection with others, so the court ruled that his losses would be borne by himself.

The court rejected the family's lawsuit and requested the family to appeal against dissatisfaction, and the second-instance judgment upheld the first-instance judgment, the man did not start in chasing the woman, and there was no subjective error in any law, there was no tort, there was no fault and damage, and there was no causal relationship between the result, so their actions did not constitute infringement, and they did not need to bear the corresponding liability for compensation.

The court rejected the claim of the woman's family, holding that the woman was self-inflicted on her own initiative.

With the continuous development of social economy, people's legal awareness is also constantly improving, but there will still be a variety of problems in life, so at this time the law will provide us with a variety of good shelter, it is precisely because of the existence of the law, our life can be more stable, and recently there is a law-related thing on the Internet, that is, a woman in Ningbo was chased by a melon farmer when she accidentally fell into the water and died. As a result, many people believe that the farmer is responsible for the woman's death, but in reality this is not the case.

According to the relevant news on the Internet, this has happened in Ningbo recently, which makes people feel very sad, that is, there is a woman in Ningbo, after stealing the melon farmer's melon fruit, accidentally fell into the water and died, many people are very sad when they hear the news, but at the same time there is a very big doubt, that is, the woman's death, whether the melon farmer should bear some responsibility, but according to the explanation of relevant experts, the melon farmer does not need to bear any responsibility.

Because according to the monitoring of the scene, we can clearly find that when the two had a dispute, they kept a certain distance, and there was no violence, and there was no threat to the woman's personal safety, but only to ask why the woman stole melons, so the woman had nothing to do with the farmer himself after the accident, and the woman's family finally sued the farmer to the court. However, the court rejected the application outright, because the court held that the matter had nothing to do with the farmers themselves.

This kind of thing happened, each of us is very sad in our hearts, so it also reminds each of us that when we want to eat melons in the future, we can buy them ourselves, and there is no need to make such dangerous behaviors, because this will not only harm ourselves, but also may affect others, so I hope everyone can take this as a wake-up call.

The melon farmer is responsible for the woman's death. Because when he was chasing the woman, when the woman died unexpectedly, he was responsible at this time.

Some of the blame will be taken, but most of the responsibility lies with the woman, because her stealing is inherently wrong.

should not be responsible, because this woman first constituted the act of stealing, and in the process of her accidental death at that time, she was hiding from this melon farmer.

No, because the melon farmer didn't know that the woman had fallen into the water, so her own behavior had nothing to do with the melon farmer.

Melon farmers are also responsible for most of the responsibility, just like the accident of a large truck on the road who was chased by the traffic police and road administration inspection vehicle