How did the dog owner respond to the scared crying child who was killed by his parents?

The pet dog frightened the child, and was thrown directly on the ground by the parents, and the puppy was killed. The dog owner responded to this incident, arguing that when the puppy hurt the child, the child's father could ask the dog owner to pay compensation, instead of throwing the puppy to the ground. When the dog owner went out with the puppy that day, because he did not take good care of his puppy, the puppy also went directly to a one-year-old child.

Because the child has not been in contact with the puppy in his life, he was directly pounced on the ground by the puppy, the child was particularly panicked at the time, and the parents saw the child so panicked, and threw the puppy to the ground in a hurry. <>

The father's approach to this child has been supported by many netizens, who believe that for such a bad dog walk, it can only make the dog owner have a long memory. Let the dog owner know that the next time you walk the dog, you will definitely consider keeping the dog on a leash so that it will not cause harm to people. This dog owner has a small border herd, because the dog is relatively small, it is more like to play with some children.

It may also be because the child is too young, so the child's center of gravity is unstable and may fall directly to the ground. <>

For some dog lovers when considering raising a puppy, if it is just because they like to raise a puppy, it must not cause a certain impact on others. If there is a problem of puppies biting people, then they will definitely be punished, so you must be civilized in raising puppies in your life. It is not only necessary to consider putting a dog leash on the puppy, but also to take the puppy to vaccinate regularly, so as to ensure the health and health safety of the dog.

The owner of the dog thinks that this puppy is equivalent to his own child, and now his own child is gone, which makes the owner feel very sad. But instead of helping the woman speak, some of the residents thought that since it was a woman's child, it would be good to have another one. Obviously, this is also deliberately provoking the dog owner, who not only did not apologize to the child's father, but still acted in his own way.

The dog owner responded that he did not leash the dog at the time and that there was corresponding responsibility, but the other party's excesses did make him very angry, and said that the dog was a puppy and did not bite.

The dog owner said that the child was just scared, and there was nothing too big, and the child's parents were too fussful, and the dog owner's statement caused the child's parents to be angry, and finally the two sides went to the police station.

The owner of the pet dog said that it was a dog and a puppy, and it did not bite, but he did not leash the dog at that time, and there was some responsibility.

The child's father is too anxious, the border collie is the most fond of children, he is too impulsive to protect the child, in front of the child fell to death the dog, which has an insignificant impact on his child's future growth, the child will only become more and more timid and afraid.

The perpetrator must be compensated, because this is damage to the property of others, and it is not an act of emergency avoidance. In Langfang, Hebei Province, a one-year-old child was playing in the community, and a pet dog suddenly pounced on the child, making the child cry. When the child's father saw that the child was hurt, he immediately rushed up and threw the dog to death.

This matter has attracted a lot of attention, and the local ** has also been involved in the investigation. Regarding this matter, the comments of netizens have also been polarized, and some people feel that this parent's approach is understandable. Because my child is so small, I must be very scared to be laid on by a pet dog, and I am also easily injured.

And this is the subconscious action of every father, who feels that his child is threatened, and will definitely take some more extreme measures. <>

And this dog owner does not leash when walking the dog, which is also very excessive. If she could have leashed her dog well while walking her dog in the community, there would have been no such tragedy. But some people feel that the father's actions are too extreme, even if they are excited, they should consider it, after all, this is a life, and this is also someone else's pet dog.

The dog owner also said that because there was no one else around at that time, he untied the dog leash, although he also served a certain responsibility in this matter, but the other party fell his dog to death without saying a word. <>

Because this matter has been handed over to ** to deal with, a reporter also interviewed a lawyer to professionally interpret this matter. According to the lawyer, it is the fault of the dog owner that he did not leash the dog. But in this world, the father's act of throwing the dog to death is not a legitimate defense, and there is no way to constitute an emergency avoidance, so there must be a certain amount of legal responsibility.

If the dog's ** is more expensive, then it is likely to pay compensation or detention for intentionally damaging other people's property.

I think it depends on the situation, if the puppy has bitten the child, and the parent accidentally falls the dog to death in a hurry, this is not required to compensate; If it is just a scared crying child and does not cause physical damage, it is a bit too much for the parent to fall the puppy to death, and compensation needs to be made.

Compensation is required because under the circumstances at the time, his act did not belong to emergency avoidance, nor did it belong to legitimate defense, and constituted the crime of intentionally damaging the property of others.

It should be compensated. Children are scared to cry, as a parent can ask the other party to take care of their pet dog. But throwing a pet dog to death is too impulsive.

The dog owner responded to the situation that day, saying that his dog was only three months old and did not bite the child, and the child's parents overreacted.

The incident was on the afternoon of April 19, 2022, in a community in Hebei, a father took his one-year-old child to play in the community, and suddenly a border herd broke into the child's field of vision, for some reason, scared the child to cry, and the child's father thought that the puppy bit his child after hearing the cry, and directly threw the puppy to death. When the dog owner saw this scene, he was furious and accused the other party of throwing his child (dog) to death. Then ** arrived at the scene to adjust for the twoIn the end, it didn't work.

As the mother of the child, the author can understand the excitement of a father when he finds out that his child may encounter risks, at this moment, what flashes in the father's mind must not be whether the dog is harmful, but how to quickly avoid the possible injury, because even if there is only a zero point of one possibility, as a child's parents will not allow, maybe for the dog owner, his dog is still young, it is impossible to bite, but the one-year-old child will not distinguish the danger possible, and the dog is not a person, No one can guarantee its every moveTherefore, it is indeed untenable for dog owners to accuse their children's parents of doing too much.

In recent years, it should have been the most loyal dog of human beings, repeatedly disgusted, afraid, dog lovers and others have contradictions, the root cause of the correction lies in the dog management problem, some dog owners are too doting on their dogs, go out as if in their own garden, let pets urinate at will, and even turn a blind eye to pets hurting people, the happiness of their own pets, above the safety of others, which leads to many people beginning to hate dogs, and even reject dog owners, If every dog owner can manage their pets well, on the basis of vaccinating their pets, they can carry a dog leash when they go out, and they can stop it when the dog is ferocious, the author thinks that there will not be so many people who reject pet dogs.

At that time, the dog owner went out with the dog, scared a 1-year-old child into crying, and the child's father fell the dog to death in a hurry, and the dog owner said that this is a puppy will not hurt people, and ** has been involved in the investigation.

It was because the pet dog was not on a leash, but swaggered in public, which scared the child, so the parents threw the dog to death in order to protect the child.

I think to a certain extent, it is the psychological impact on the child, the father's side-by-side behavior is more cruel, which has caused very serious damage to the child's young mind, and may also have a great impact on his future life, whether he will learn from his father's cruel way, and his health and psychology have been affected.

I think the child's approach will leave a psychological shadow on the child, the pet dog just expressed malice to the child, which will make the baby afraid of the dog in his heart, and the father's tyrannical methods will cause the child's heart to be full of shadows, and there is a very bad effect on his future development. Luck.

The father's actions can leave a psychological shadow on the child, which may cause the child to be afraid of the father, or to see the father and think of the dog being thrown to death.

Personally, I think the parents' behavior is really excessive. Because after the pet dog scares the child, parents can choose to deal with the matter by communicating with the pet dog owner. Instead of choosing to just throw the pet dog to death.

In fact, for every parent, they will take care of their children through their own ability. So when their children are scared and cry by pet dogs, they can't accept this fact in their hearts. And there will also be a more angry state. <>

What happened to me.

A one-year-old child in Hebei Province cried after being pounced on by a pet dog, and in this case, the child's father chose to vent his frustration by falling and killing the pet dog on the spot. And after the dog was killed, there was a fierce quarrel between the child's father and the owner of the dog. As a result, many netizens have commented on the content of **after finishing this paragraph**.

The parents' behavior is indeed excessive.

And I personally think that in this case, the parents' behavior is indeed more radical. Because the behavior of a pet dog knocking down a child is indeed a wrong behavior, but parents do not fall to death. Instead, you should choose to check your child for wounds as soon as possible.

Then deal with the matter by communicating with the dog owner. After all, for all adults, when encountering things, they should maintain a relatively rational state. <>

My personal opinion on this matter of his.

And I personally feel that in this case, the pet dog owner did not walk the dog by leashing, which is a mistake in itself. Therefore, you should make a relative review of your own behavior, and there are certain mistakes in the behavior of the child's father who fell to death and killed the pet dog. So in general, I think both the owner of the dog and the father of the child should apologize to each other.

And solve the contradictions between each other in a more reasonable way.

Really, the behavior of parents is indeed a little too excited, and it is also a little excessive, and this behavior may leave a bad shadow on the child, and may even accompany the child for the rest of his life.

The parent's behavior is indeed an overreaction, and the emotion should be reasonably controlled, and the behavior of falling to death should not occur.

I think the parent's behavior was really excessive, because the dog only scared the child at that time, but it did not hurt the child.