Behind the no forced removal of small and medium sized farmers , will the price of agricultural and

Behind the "no forced removal of small and medium-sized farmers", will the price of agricultural and sideline products be reduced?

On September 27, China's ** network issued the "Opinions of the General Office on Promoting the High-quality Development of Animal Husbandry", which proposed to help the development of small and medium-sized farmers, the main contents of which are the following articles.

A strengthen the guidance and assistance of small and medium-sized farmers, and shall not be forcibly removed by administrative means.

Encourage new agricultural operators to establish a mechanism for linking interests with small and medium-sized farmers, drive small and medium-sized farmers to specialize in production, and enhance market competitiveness.

Strengthen the construction of grassroots animal husbandry and veterinary technology promotion system, improve the socialized service system, cultivate and expand animal husbandry science and technology service enterprises, and provide small and medium-sized farmers with practical scientific and technological services such as improved breeding, feed nutrition, disease detection and diagnosis, mechanized production, product storage and transportation, and waste resource utilization. That's all for the comments.

In the past few years, many free-range farmers have not been allowed to raise cattle for a variety of reasons. Environmental protection is only a clear reason, in fact, because free-range farmers are not very important, always feel that small and chaotic is not easy to manage, and do not create profits and taxes, dozens of free-range farmers are not as good as a large-scale farm. It is for this reason that many small and medium-sized cattle farms have been cleared, which can lead to complaints.

In the past, small and medium-sized farmers had a hard time, but recently a regulation was introduced, that is, small and medium-sized farmers cannot be forcibly removed, but also supported. After the introduction of this regulation, everyone has confidence, but to be honest, it is still far from regaining confidence in one fell swoop.

b used to be cleared when it was not needed, but now that the beef is expensive, I want to support it to stabilize the production, and many friends are not comfortable. It's like abandoning you when you didn't need it before, and now you need everyone to raise cattle and introduce various favorable policies, but everyone has been injured, and this injury can be so easy to get better.

For the farmers who were cleared before, there is no compensation now, and what confidence do you have to let everyone come back to breeding. And many friends are also afraid that once the cattle farm is built, there will be changes and removal in two years, and it will be hurt even more.

As mentioned in the "Opinions" above, it is not encouraged to forcibly remove small and medium-sized farmers, and to encourage more help to these small and medium-sized farmers, and to solve the problems encountered by small and medium-sized farmers in the mode of large enterprises driving small and medium-sized farmers.

c The implication is that small and medium-sized farmers may not be able to do comprehensive detection and prevention work in actual work, but if our farms have large enterprises "backing", such as our farm products and large enterprises together testing, equivalent to large enterprises when testing, by the way of our products, to put it bluntly, is actually a rational use of resources, and at that time, our products may not be our direct sales, Maybe it's the company's sales incidentally or after testing and related certifications, so it's also a good way for us to choose to cooperate with some large enterprises.

Agricultural and sideline products will not further reduce prices, but will rise further. Now the world is full of food crises, so in order to ensure food security, this policy is in place.

Behind the stability of the number of small and medium-sized farmers, it is conducive to the overall stability of the agricultural and sideline market, and the vegetables and fruits will be relatively stable, and they may also be slightly reduced.

No, it won't. Small and medium-sized farmers will only sell more than large-scale production, because the cost of raw materials they need is higher, and the yield is not as high as that of large-scale production.

Agricultural and sideline products will not be reduced in price, if the small and medium-sized farmers are cleared, the production, operation, processing and sales of agricultural and sideline products are all operated by large enterprises, the cost increases, and the product will only be higher, not reduced.

I don't think so, because after the removal of small and medium-sized farmers, the output will decrease in a short period of time, and the demand will be greater than the supply, and it will even increase in a short period of time.

I still have to take another look, because most of the farmers are small farmers, but it will affect their own business, so now we have to observe for a while, but I believe that as long as your half-time qualification has the relevant procedures are complete, the state will not cheat you.

The official announcement shall not forcibly clear small and medium-sized farmers, it can be said that this is a kind of protection for small and medium-sized farmers, so the spring of farmers can be said to have arrived.

This is not necessarily, it still depends on the specific policies of the state, but the state must support the development of small and medium-sized enterprises.

The reason for such a favorable policy is mainly to promote the development of animal husbandry and ensure that all kinds of meat products can meet the living needs of the people.

Affected by the epidemic, China's pigs, cattle, and mutton are now very high, and small and medium-sized farmers are not forcibly cleared, so that there can be more meat, and farmers can also take advantage of today's ** to make money, but now the cost of breeding, such as feed, is also rising in price, but the overall is still profitable, so the "spring" is coming.

"Opinions" put forward to support the development of small and medium-sized farmers. Strengthen the guidance and assistance of small and medium-sized farmers, and shall not be forcibly removed by administrative means.

**Officials have made detailed explanations; Support the development of small and medium-scale farmers. This shows that for small and medium-sized farmers, there is no idea of giving up or retreating, on the contrary, for the sake of the people, to improve the people's living standards and quality, in all aspects is to try their best to help small and medium-sized farmers in the morning a reasonable development of the road. <>

For small and medium-sized farmers, it is indeed not as competitive as large farmers, and there are some irregularities in health and epidemic prevention. However, these farmers will release a vitality to the market, in general, it is to improve the overall competitiveness of the market, which is more conducive to our consumer groups to consume and choose. At the same time, it will also make the market more diversified.

So overall, it's a good thing. What we have to believe is that our ** is always for the sake of the people, and the policies it promulgated have a certain degree of truth. This official explanation is a blessing for small and medium-sized farmers, as well as a gospel for our consumers.

I believe that in the future market, we will definitely have more high-quality, cheaper meat for us to choose from, let us eat. <>

And not forcibly remove small and medium-sized farmers does not mean that the development of small and medium-sized farmers is indulged, in other aspects of the review is still strict, such as animal epidemic prevention, the official requirements to implement inspections, the formation of a good epidemic prevention system, and to implement the responsibility, for violations of the law and other aspects need to bear the corresponding punishment. <>

Have said this, I think we should have a certain understanding of the development of small and medium-sized farmers, the official explanation of this has also been very clear, for the development of the aquaculture industry, I think the official layout is more reasonable, taking into account the survival of small farmers is not easy, but also to ensure the food safety of our consumers.

It is necessary to strengthen the cultivation and promotion of improved breeds, implement subsidies for improved breeds of pigs and subsidies for improved breeds of animal husbandry in pastoral areas, improve the first-class forage system, implement grain to feed according to local conditions, improve the level of mechanization of animal husbandry, and develop moderately large-scale operations.

The government has made it clear that small and medium-sized farmers should not be dismissed, and even policy support and help should be given. The State encourages cooperation between small and medium-sized farmers and business entities.

The official explanation of this is to support small and medium-sized farmers, because the situation is very bad this year, so the official support for small and medium-sized farmers, vigorously develop the aquaculture industry, to maintain food security.