What was Huxley s reason for considering man noble compared to animals?

Updated on society 2024-08-01
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-15

    Huxley believed that humans are social animals, and the animals of the herd are animals that take the group as their way of life, and generally take the collective as a unit in their lives, and take care of each other and assist each other in their lives, whether eating, sleeping, migrating or other behaviors.

    Generally, herbivores live in groups to protect themselves, such as: wildebeest, antelope, Tibetan wild ass, wild horse, zebra, rhinoceros, elephant, African buffalo, takin, etc.; The largest fauna in the world is the East African antelope, which can often exceed 100 million in a herd (in mammals); Most primates are also social animals: golden monkeys, chimpanzees, baboons, gibbons, etc., including humans; Many rodents also live in groups, such as rats and rabbits; There are also many bird species, such as:

    Flamingos, gulls, penguins, pelicans, sparrows, and migratory birds like swans and geese.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-14

    Huxley's Theory of Heavenly Evolution and Darwin's Theory of Evolution have had a great impact on modern Chinese science and modern Chinese. There are two reasons why Huxley felt that human beings are more noble than animals, one is that he looks at animals from a human-centered point of view, and naturally feels that he is nobler than animals, which is called "the noble are noble"; The second is that the animals he compared, in our world, their intelligence is not as good as that of humans, otherwise, humans would not become the masters of this world (look at the situation of animals being brutally killed by humans, you will know what "domination" is).

    Religion and science both try to explain the world with their own theories, such as Han Ziguo said that they have differences on the origin of human beings, and the end of the school believes that one is to use empirical means to start from the phenomenal world**, such as Darwin's theory of evolution, all start from the body, and even find evidence from embryology; Religion, on the other hand, uses the means of internal evidence to start from the essence of the mind. The end of the school believes that human beings can recognize certain truths whether they start from the phenomenon or the essence. The theory of "dependent arising voidness" mentioned in Buddhism has fundamentally solved the problem of the origin of human beings and the universe, but there are too few people who understand it, and even fewer people who have realized it, just like the physicists in the world today, there are not many people who really understand the theory of relativity, and even fewer who really understand the essence of "superstrings".

    Therefore, the exploration of the origin of human beings will become an eternal topic for human beings, because as far as the individual is concerned, everyone's realm can never be the same, this is caused by karma, and there is no way for everyone to know an "objective truth".

    There is no Amitabha Buddha in the south!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-13

    Huxley believed that the human eye is the animal with the eye.

    a.Living alone. b.Live together.

    c.Society is late in selling.

    d.Naturalness.

    Correct answer: B

Related questions
15 answers2024-08-01

The human senses don't seem to be sensitive to magnetic fields, and we can't rely on the Earth's magnetic field alone to help determine where to walk, like dolphins and geese. Is it therefore possible to say that the movement of the human body has nothing to do with the magnetic field? This requires in-depth analysis; There are many times when you don't feel something, just because it doesn't really exist. >>>More

21 answers2024-08-01

Regarding human nature, a Shanghai girlfriend of mine said this: "Human nature is inherently selfish, and if people do not do it for themselves, they will be destroyed by heaven and earth." In addition to being the most beautiful of our Shanghai women, we are also the most shrewd, so we all have a wonderful life. >>>More

13 answers2024-08-01

I think it depends on the situation. Sometimes there is no way back, as long as it is right, the only way is to continue to persevere. If there's a better option, why not try it?

17 answers2024-08-01

You're right, no one can prove that they have a past life or a present life, and no one can prove that they have an afterlife, so cherish this opportunity for you to be a human being.

7 answers2024-08-01

Of course, it is completely dissipated, because to die is to die. When a substance disappears, it has nothing, just like a pig has been eaten by us, and it is nothing.