After remarrying, the man sued his 5 year old son in court to reduce child support, is his claim rea

After the man remarried, in order to reduce the maintenance fee, he sued his 5-year-old son in court, and his appeal was unreasonable, first of all, as the child grows up, this maintenance will only increase unabated, and it is impossible to reduce it. Secondly, the amount of this alimony was agreed upon by both parties at that time, and it cannot be easily changed without special circumstances. <

Recently, in Hubei, after a couple divorced in Wuhan, the man paid 2,200 yuan per month to the child support, and later the man said that his income decreased after remarriage, so he hoped to reduce the child support, and then the woman refused, but the man sued his biological son in court, and finally the court rejected the man's request to reduce the child support. I don't think his demands are reasonable.

First of all, as the child grows, this child support will only increase unabated, and it is impossible to decrease. Because as the child's age increases, the cost of education will definitely increase, and it is impossible to reduce it, including the mother's side will also increase the cost of raising him, so the mother can ask for an increase in the father's maintenance if necessary, and it is impossible to reduce the child support, and remarriage is not a reason to reduce the child support. In any case, we can't sacrifice children's education and growth in order to save some money, this is a matter related to children's lives, and this demand is definitely unreasonable.

Secondly, the amount of this alimony was agreed upon by both parties at that time, and it cannot be easily changed without special circumstances. As for the maintenance fee, it was an amount determined by the two parties after careful consideration and joint negotiation at the time of divorce, and this amount is an agreement, and it is impossible to change it casually without special circumstances. Unless one of the parties has good reasons to ask for a reduction in child support, such as a reduction in the ability to work, or a deterioration in the economy, and it is no longer able to make ends meet.

In exceptional cases, special judgments are imposed. Therefore, I think it is very reasonable for the law to reject his request.

The above is the reason why I personally feel that this man's appeal is unreasonable.

You are unreasonable, because I think that since you gave birth to him, you should raise him so that he can get a better material level.

This claim is extremely unreasonable, because the man waits for his son to be under the age of majority, and according to the law, he is required to pay maintenance until he reaches the age of majority.

Of course it wasn't reasonable, the man obviously just thought that this son was a drag oil bottle and wanted to get rid of him.

Every child longs for a complete family, a mother who loves him, and a father who cares about him, but it often backfires, and there will always be a time when people don't fulfill their wishes! In a divorced family, the child has become the most innocent one, and even the biological parents regard the most innocent child as a burden and sue their five-year-old son in court!

Here's the thing, the husband and wife divorced because of emotional disagreement, and when they divorced, the children followed their mothers, and their fathers gave the mother and son 2,200 yuan per month in child support! However, this child support, the child's mother has to urge many times every time, and the child's father will give it, and sometimes even have to be enforced by the court!

Not only that, but soon, Dad had a new family and a new child! Dad thinks that it is too much pressure to earn money by himself, to support the existing family, and to give his ex-wife's children 2,200 yuan a month. So, I found a preliminary negotiation and wanted to talk about reducing the child support fee to 1,000 yuan per month, but the child's mother naturally did not agree.

Probably due to the pressure of life, the child's father actually sued his own son born to his ex-wife in court, although the child was only five years old, in court, the child's father asked the judge to reduce the child support to 1,000 yuan per month! After the trial, the court finally rejected the man's lawsuit, and the alimony is still 2,200 yuan per month!

This father's approach is really infuriating, the child is still young, as a biological father, he does not consider how to minimize the harm caused by divorce to the child, but regards the child as his own burden? This reminds me of the 21-year-old single mother who took her child to deliver food on the Internet recently, and she is really a mother, this single mother said in an interview: Since you have a child, you have to be responsible for the child!

In contrast, I really hope that this father can also learn from this single mother and see his children as a responsibility rather than a burden!

Because the child needs child support every month, and it will cause a lot of financial pressure on the biological father, it becomes a burden on the biological father.

After a man remarries, he takes his 5-year-old son to court in order to reduce child support, is such a person worthy of being a father?

There is a man in Wuhan, Hubei Province, who mediated a divorce with his wife when the child was less than one year old, and the mediation letter issued by the court when dealing with the divorce case clearly stipulates that the child is raised by the woman, and the child's father must pay 2,000 yuan per month for the child support, and from the age of three years old, the child support will increase accordingly, and the child's future education and medical expenses are jointly borne by the child's parents. But after the child's father got married again, because his wife was pregnant, he thought about adjusting the amount of child support, because the man thought that his family expenses were also relatively large, and his income had also decreased due to the epidemic, so he sued his son to the court, hoping to reduce the child support to 1,000 yuan per month.

Because the child's mother is also very hard in the process of raising the child, if the amount of the child's father's child support is reduced, the child's quality of life will inevitably decline, which will be a very big difficulty for the child's mother and the child himself, so the child's mother applied for legal aid, and the court found after the investigation and trial that the child's father rarely visited the child after the child's parents divorced, and the payment of child support was also delayed, and the child's living expenses, It was also a lot every month, so the court finally rejected the child's father's request to reduce child support.

The man in this case has a new family, so he wants to reduce the maintenance of his own son, he did not consider that if he pays less child support, it will affect the normal life and education rights of the child, just for his own selfishness, want to live a good life in his own small family, this kind of thinking is very speechless, because since as the father of the child, he should pay child support, so that the child can grow up smoothly, and blindly evading responsibility will be morally condemned. And the law does not allow anyone to deliberately evade their responsibilities.

I don't think it's worthy, first of all, since you should raise your children as a father, even if you say that you remarry, you can't lower the standard of raising your own children.

Such a father is not worthy. His own son can go to court, what else can he not do, I really feel sad for this son to have such a father.

This man's operation is very confusing, in order to avoid child support for his son, he sued the five-year-old child in court, such a person is simply a father in vain.

First of all, it can be seen that this man is not worthy of being a father at all, if he can't bear the burden of the child's life, he shouldn't choose to remarry, tease and ignore his child no matter what.

According to the provisions of divorce, a man pays more than 2,000 yuan in child support to his children every month, but the man reduced the child support by nearly half on the grounds of his lower income, because he was unable to bear more than 2,000 yuan in child support, so he sued his son who was a few years old in court. However, the court dismissed the claim because the man should pay his biological son his due monthly alimony. <>

In fact, divorce is the most unfair for children, he has no right to choose his parents, adult emotional discord has caused him to live in a single-parent family since he was a child, and this biological father is very irresponsible, he promised good alimony when he divorced, but he didn't want to pay later, it is very difficult for a woman to live with a child who is a few years old, but this man reduced child support on the grounds of reduced income during the epidemic, but he did not expect to be rejected by his ex-wife, So he sued his son in court, but the court rejected the man's appeal, which should be very happy news for many people, because he himself has to bear the child support, and even if the family is reorganized, he should bear some responsibility for raising his ex-wife's son. <>

It is understood that the child's mother's monthly income is not stable, only a few thousand yuan, and the father of this little boy has a very stable income, and is fully capable of paying, more than 2,000 yuan per month in child support, so the court rejected such a claim, this matter should be the most hurt by this child, because his biological father sued him in court, maybe this is something he will never forget for a lifetime, even so, I hope he can also grow up healthy and healthy. <>

After the father got married, he sued his five-year-old son and asked for a reduction in child support, which was rejected by the court. Ask to pay all the time.

Jimu News reported that after the couple divorced, the child's father Zhang Bing (pseudonym) should pay 2,200 yuan per month to the child in child support in accordance with the provisions of the divorce agreement. However, five months ago, Zhang Bing demanded that the child's maintenance fee be reduced to 1,000 yuan, citing a decrease in income.

It should be that the father's appeal was rejected, because he was legally responsible for the maintenance of his own children.

As a father, it was difficult for me to understand the father's behavior in this case. In the face of his own son, he did not fulfill his responsibility as a father to raise and accompany him, and he was already full of guilt. In this case, I even want to reduce the cost of child support and reduce the environment and conditions for the child's growth.

Such an act also aroused the anger of many netizens, and some netizens said emotionally that if they have no money, they should not remarry, and even if they remarry, they should not raise any more children.

It happened to a father who divorced his wife by mutual agreement because of a feud with his wife when the child was less than a year old. According to the agreement, the man needs to pay 2,200 yuan per month for child support until the man reaches adulthood. During the period, the child's education and medical expenses shall be shared equally by both husband and wife.

If the man can follow the rules all the time, we don't have a good opinion of anything. But the man later remarried, and in order to reduce the cost of child support, he did not hesitate to sue his son in court, demanding a reduction in the cost of child support and paying 1,000 yuan per month. The man gave a reason that he was affected by the new crown epidemic, his monthly income dropped sharply, and he had to conceive children after remarriage, and his life was too stressful.

Faced with such a claim, the court rejected the man's request on the basis of law and facts, and safeguarded the legitimate rights and interests of orphans and widows. Judging from this incident alone, the man's approach is not authentic, and he has not fulfilled his responsibilities as a father.

In the face of his own son, even if he is divorced, he has the obligation and responsibility to raise him. As the saying goes: "The love of parents is far-reaching", this father is difficult to take responsibility, after forming a new family, the care for the children of his original family is greatly reduced.

A 5-year-old child was sued by a lawsuit, which still came from his father. I don't know how the child will think of his father when he grows up and learns about this situation. If a man treats his own son like this, it will also destroy the relationship between father and son.

This father's behavior is undesirable and should also be criticized and educated. Fortunately, the court did not agree and rejected the man's claim. It is hoped that after this experience, men can also reflect on their mistakes and treat their children well until they reach adulthood.

After the father remarried, he sued his 5-year-old son to reduce child support! What do you think of this father's behavior as irresponsible and morally deficient, and also selfish! It's really ignorant to take responsibility for lowering child support! There is a legal obligation to bear the full maintenance of the child.

I don't think this father is worthy of being a father at all, his behavior is simply inferior to a pig and a dog, and such a person is not worthy of educating children, because the educated children may be the same as him, and such a father is really embarrassing.

This father's behavior is really immoral, he can't even afford to raise a 5-year-old child, which is not worthy of being a biological father at all.

Because the man is married again, and the new wife is pregnantHe didn't want to give his son such high child support, so his request is unreasonable, and the court naturally wants to reject it.

01. After the man remarried, in order to reduce the alimony, he lied that his income was unstable, and the court: the reason is not established!

Let's start with the fact that in 2017, a man and his wife in Wuhan divorced, and according to the agreement between the two parties, he needed to give his son 2,000 yuan per month in child support, which became 2,200 yuan after the age of 3. When the man remarried in 2020, he began to not want to give 2,200 yuan in child support, so he asked his ex-wife to negotiate whether he could reduce the child support, but his ex-wife refused. The man also had a plan to take his 5-year-old son to court, on the grounds that he was married again, had a new child, and Zhaoshou's income from the epidemic had decreased, hoping to change the child support for his 5-year-old son from 2,200 yuan to 1,000 yuan.

In addition, the court learned through investigation that the man and his ex-wife both worked in state-owned enterprises, and their incomes were very stable, and there was no impact of the epidemic. In addition, the 5-year-old child's living expenses, medical expenses and other expenses were higher than the child's mother's income, and the man could not provide proof that his income was less, so the court rejected the man's request in a comprehensive judgment.

02. Remarriage and rechildbearing are not a reason to reduce child support.

In fact, I am quite convinced of this man, his own income is very stable, because he is married again, he doesn't want to give his son such a high child support, does he think the divorce agreement issued by the court is a joke? Can alimony be changed at will? And he doesn't know how high the cost of raising a child is, 2200 is really not much, and the face requirements are lowered, which is really excessive.

The point is that he failed to negotiate with his ex-wife, but instead took his 5-year-old son to court, I want to know how you will face him when the child grows up? Because you are for the sake of his younger siblings, thus reducing the quality of life of the child, this is the practice of breaking the relationship between father and son.

Therefore, I would like to warn you not to think that the cost of raising a child is very low. Child support can be given if you want to, and if you want to reduce it, it will definitely not be calculated in this way, and the law has clear provisions.